Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Sherbrooke University Hospital, Sherbrooke, Québec, Canada.
Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Sherbrooke University Hospital, Sherbrooke, Québec, Canada.
Nutrition. 2019 May;61:173-178. doi: 10.1016/j.nut.2018.11.001. Epub 2018 Nov 16.
Critical illness in patients is characterized by systemic inflammation and oxidative stress. Vitamin D has a myriad of biological functions relevant to this population, including immunomodulation by the alteration of cytokine production and nuclear factor loop amplification. Low serum levels have consistently been found in observational studies conducted on critically ill patients, but the causality with mortality and worse outcomes has not been confirmed. The current focus is on interventional trials, whereas the pharmacokinetic profile of vitamin D administration remains sparse and the optimal strategy has not been confirmed. So far, high-dose oral or enteral supplementation is the most studied strategy. The largest randomized controlled trial published so far, the VITdAL-ICU (Effect of High-dose Vitamin D3 on Hospital Length of Stay in Critically Ill Patients with Vitamin D Deficiency) trial, showed no benefits on mortality in its primary analysis. However, secondary analysis suggested improvement in those patients with severe deficiency (i.e., 25-dihydroxyvitaminD <12 ng/mL). Smaller trials investigated intramuscular and intravenous administration and found interesting intermediate biochemical findings, including increased cathelicidins, but were not powered to investigate relevant clinical outcomes in the critically ill. The latest meta-analysis, which was recently published, does not support benefits of vitamin D supplementation in the heterogeneous population of critically ill patients. The European guidelines, published in the last year, suggest supplementing severely deficient patients with levels <12.5 ng/mL within the first week after ICU admission. However, other societies do not support such supplementation in their older recommendations. Large trials are currently recruiting ICU patients and could elucidate potential clinical benefits of vitamin D therapy in the critically ill.
危重症患者的特点是全身炎症和氧化应激。维生素 D 具有多种与该人群相关的生物学功能,包括通过改变细胞因子产生和核因子环扩增来调节免疫。在对危重症患者进行的观察性研究中,一致发现血清水平较低,但与死亡率和预后不良的因果关系尚未得到证实。目前的重点是干预性试验,而维生素 D 给药的药代动力学特征仍然很少,最佳策略尚未得到证实。到目前为止,高剂量口服或肠内补充是研究最多的策略。迄今为止发表的最大的随机对照试验,即 VITdAL-ICU(高剂量维生素 D3 对维生素 D 缺乏的危重症患者住院时间的影响)试验,在其主要分析中并未显示对死亡率有任何益处。然而,二次分析表明,在严重缺乏的患者中(即 25-羟维生素 D <12ng/mL)有改善。较小的试验研究了肌肉内和静脉内给药,发现了有趣的中间生化发现,包括增加抗菌肽,但没有能力研究危重病患者的相关临床结局。最近发表的最新荟萃分析不支持维生素 D 补充对危重病患者异质人群的益处。去年发表的欧洲指南建议在 ICU 入院后第一周内,对水平<12.5ng/mL 的严重缺乏患者进行补充。然而,其他协会在其旧的建议中不支持这种补充。目前正在招募 ICU 患者的大型试验可能阐明维生素 D 治疗在危重病患者中的潜在临床益处。