Frederick Z A, Villani S, Cox K D, Los L, Allen J
Department of Plant Pathology and Plant-Microbe Biology, New York State Agricultural Experiment Station, Cornell University, Geneva, NY 14456.
Department of Plant Science and Landscape Architecture, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT 06269.
Plant Dis. 2011 Dec;95(12):1589. doi: 10.1094/PDIS-07-11-0609.
Since the relaxation of federal sanctions on the planting of Ribes crops because of the development of white pine blister rust (WPBR) immune Ribes cultivars (3), a small industry for the production of Ribes fruit for fresh and processing markets was established in New York and surrounding New England states. The majority of Ribes acreage in the region is planted to a WPBR immune black currant R. nigrum cv. Titania. From 2008 to June 2011, symptoms resembling those caused by WPBR pathogen Cronartium ribicola were observed at a large (>12 ha) R. nigrum cv. Titania planting in Preston, CT. In 2008, infection was restricted to a single field (100% incidence), but in 2009, all fields suffered from premature defoliation by late July. In 2010 and 2011, there was considerable incidence (>85%), but premature defoliation was kept in check by chemical management. Symptoms began as chlorotic lesions (0.5 to 4.3 mm in diameter) on both sides of the leaf. These chlorotic lesions had margins delineated by leaf veins and many developed necrotic (0.3 to 0.9 mm in diameter) centers on the upper surface of leaves within 2 to 3 weeks. The undersides of lesions developed blisters containing orange uredinia (0.1 to 0.33 mm in diameter) with smooth peridia that broke with the production of yellow-orange urediniospores (30 × 15 to 25 μm). Symptoms and signs were consistent with published descriptions of C. ribicola (1) and with WPBR infections on highly susceptible R. nigrum cv. Ben Alder planted at the New York State Agricultural Experiment Station in Geneva. Additional confirmation was provided by sequencing the two internal transcribed spacer (ITS) regions and the 5.8S gene (GenBank Accession No. JN587805; 98% identity with No. DQ533975) in the nuclear ribosomal repeat using primers ITS1-F and ITS4 as described previously (2,4). Furthermore, an attempt was made to confirm pathogenicity in the greenhouse by inoculating shoots of potted nursery stock of R. nigrum cv. Titania. Shoots were inoculated by rubbing leaves with either an uninfected currant leaf or a currant leaf from Preston, CT sporulating with urediniospores. Plants were subsequently misted with dH20 and covered with plastic bags for 24 h. Plants were watered biweekly and kept in a greenhouse with 39 to 65% relative humidity at 21 to 26°C. Shoots were monitored for symptom development on a weekly basis. After 3 weeks, 2 of the 10 plants inoculated with infected leaves developed chlorotic lesions and uredinia identical to those on leaves from Preston, CT, while all others remained healthy. Although not easily reproducible in a greenhouse, the breakdown of immunity in R. nigrum cv. Titania was observed for the last 4 years in Connecticut. Given that WPBR immunity was one of the conditions for legalized planting of Ribes, the breakdown of immunity has potentially deleterious implications particularly for nearby states like Massachusetts and New York, in which the Ribes industries are expanding. Moreover, Ribes growers may need to rely on chemical management programs to manage WPBR in the future. References: (1) G. B. Cummins. Illustrated Genera of Rust Fungi. Burgess Publishing Company, Minneapolis, MN, 1959. (2) M. Gardes and T. D. Bruns. Mol. Ecol. 2:113, 1993. (3) S. McKay. Hortic. Technol. 10:562, 2000. (4) T. J. White et al. PCR Protocols: A Guide to Methods and Applications. Academic Press, Inc., San Diego, CA, 1990.
由于白松疱锈菌(WPBR)免疫的茶藨子品种的培育,联邦政府放宽了对茶藨子作物种植的制裁(3),纽约及周边新英格兰州建立了一个小规模的茶藨子水果生产产业,产品供应新鲜和加工市场。该地区大部分茶藨子种植面积都种植了WPBR免疫的黑醋栗品种‘泰坦尼亚’。从2008年到2011年6月,在康涅狄格州普雷斯顿的一个大型(>12公顷)‘泰坦尼亚’黑醋栗种植园中,观察到了类似由WPBR病原菌茶藨生柱锈菌引起的症状。2008年,感染仅限于一个地块(发病率100%),但在2009年,到7月下旬所有地块都出现了过早落叶的情况。2010年和2011年,发病率相当高(>85%),但通过化学防治控制住了过早落叶的情况。症状最初表现为叶片两面的褪绿病斑(直径0.5至4.3毫米)。这些褪绿病斑的边缘由叶脉界定,许多在2至3周内在叶片上表面形成坏死中心(直径0.3至0.9毫米)。病斑下表面形成含有橙色夏孢子堆(直径0.1至0.33毫米)的疱状物,夏孢子堆有光滑的包被,破裂后产生橙黄色夏孢子(30×15至25微米)。症状和病征与已发表的茶藨生柱锈菌描述一致(1),也与在纽约州日内瓦农业试验站种植的高度感病的‘本·阿尔德’黑醋栗上的WPBR感染情况一致。通过使用引物ITS1-F和ITS4对核糖体重复序列中的两个内部转录间隔区(ITS)和5.8S基因进行测序(GenBank登录号:JN587805;与DQ533975的同一性为98%),进一步证实了这一点,如之前所述(2,4)。此外,还尝试通过接种盆栽‘泰坦尼亚’黑醋栗苗木的嫩枝在温室中确认致病性。用未感染的醋栗叶或来自康涅狄格州普雷斯顿带有夏孢子的醋栗叶擦拭叶片对接种嫩枝。随后用蒸馏水对植株进行喷雾处理,并用塑料袋覆盖24小时。每两周给植株浇水一次,并将其置于相对湿度为39%至65%、温度为21至26°C的温室中。每周监测嫩枝的症状发展情况。3周后,接种感染叶的10株植物中有2株出现了与康涅狄格州普雷斯顿叶片上相同的褪绿病斑和夏孢子堆,而其他所有植株均保持健康。尽管在温室中不易重复出现,但在康涅狄格州过去4年中观察到了‘泰坦尼亚’黑醋栗的免疫性丧失情况。鉴于WPBR免疫是茶藨子合法种植的条件之一,免疫性丧失可能会产生潜在的有害影响,特别是对马萨诸塞州和纽约州等附近州,这些州的茶藨子产业正在扩张。此外,茶藨子种植者未来可能需要依靠化学防治计划来管理WPBR。参考文献:(1)G. B. 康明斯。《锈菌图解属》。伯吉斯出版公司,明尼阿波利斯,明尼苏达州,1959年。(2)M. 加尔德斯和T. D. 布伦斯。《分子生态学》2:113,1993年。(3)S. 麦凯。《园艺技术》10:562,2000年。(4)T. J. 怀特等人。《PCR协议:方法与应用指南》。学术出版社,加利福尼亚州圣地亚哥,1990年。