Suppr超能文献

腹膜透析和血液透析的慢性肾脏病患者认知功能与痴呆风险的比较:一项遵循PRISMA标准的系统评价和荟萃分析。

The comparison of cognitive function and risk of dementia in CKD patients under peritoneal dialysis and hemodialysis: A PRISMA-compliant systematic review and meta-analysis.

作者信息

Tian Xiaolin, Guo Xiaokun, Xia Xiaoshuang, Yu Haibo, Li Xin, Jiang Aili

机构信息

Department of Neurology, Second Hospital of Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin Municipality.

Health and Medical Department, Second Hospital of Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin Municipality.

出版信息

Medicine (Baltimore). 2019 Feb;98(6):e14390. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000014390.

Abstract

BACKGROUNDS

Cognitive functions (CF) decline has been reported in end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients. However, the influence of dialysis modalities on CF has not been investigated systematically.

METHODS

A systematic literature search was conducted in MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane library and unpublished database Clinicaltrials.gov to identify the studies comparing the cognitive functions or risk of dementia between hemodialysis (HD) and peritoneal dialysis (PD). After data extraction, quality of studies was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale. Both qualitative and quantitative analyses were performed.

RESULTS

After study inclusion, totally 15 cohort or cross-sectional studies were included, comparing the cognitive functions using neuropsychological tests and covering the executive function, memory, orientation, attention, etc. By qualitative analysis, it showed that more studies are inclined to PD compared with HD with better cognitive functions. By quantitative analysis, it showed that PD showed better performance in the tests of Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), stroop interference test and exhibited lower risk of dementia compared with HD.

CONCLUSIONS

In this meta-analysis, we draw preliminary conclusion that patients treated with PD had better cognitive functions and lower dementia risk compared with patients with HD. Still more large-scale and well-conducted prospective cohort studies are needed to draw more convincing conclusions.

摘要

背景

已有报道称终末期肾病(ESRD)患者存在认知功能(CF)下降。然而,尚未系统研究透析方式对认知功能的影响。

方法

在MEDLINE、Embase、Cochrane图书馆和未发表数据库Clinicaltrials.gov中进行系统文献检索,以确定比较血液透析(HD)和腹膜透析(PD)之间认知功能或痴呆风险的研究。数据提取后,使用纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表评估研究质量。进行了定性和定量分析。

结果

纳入研究后,共纳入15项队列研究或横断面研究,使用神经心理学测试比较认知功能,涵盖执行功能、记忆、定向、注意力等。定性分析表明,与血液透析相比,更多研究倾向于腹膜透析具有更好的认知功能。定量分析表明,与血液透析相比,腹膜透析在简易精神状态检查表(MMSE)、蒙特利尔认知评估(MoCA)、斯特鲁普干扰测试中表现更好,痴呆风险更低。

结论

在这项荟萃分析中,我们初步得出结论,与接受血液透析的患者相比,接受腹膜透析治疗的患者具有更好的认知功能和更低痴呆风险。仍需要更多大规模且开展良好的前瞻性队列研究来得出更有说服力的结论。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3e1a/6380759/07cf4c48e2c6/medi-98-e14390-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验