• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Hungry for more: key stakeholders' support for more stringent school food policies.欲壑难填:关键利益相关者对更严格的学校食品政策的支持。
Public Health Nutr. 2019 Jun;22(8):1483-1491. doi: 10.1017/S1368980018003919. Epub 2019 Feb 8.
2
Stakeholder perceptions of a school food policy ten years on.利益相关者对学校食品政策十年的看法。
Public Health Nutr. 2018 May;21(7):1370-1374. doi: 10.1017/S1368980017003962. Epub 2018 Jan 24.
3
Predictors of positive outcomes of a school food provision policy in Australia.澳大利亚学校食品供应政策积极成果的预测因素。
Health Promot Int. 2014 Jun;29(2):317-27. doi: 10.1093/heapro/das075. Epub 2013 Jan 7.
4
Effectiveness of a multicomponent intervention to enhance implementation of a healthy canteen policy in Australian primary schools: a randomised controlled trial.多组分干预措施提高澳大利亚小学健康食堂政策实施效果的随机对照试验
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2016 Oct 7;13(1):106. doi: 10.1186/s12966-016-0431-5.
5
Stakeholder perceptions of a comprehensive school food policy in Western Australia.西澳大利亚全面学校食品政策的利益相关者认知。
Health Policy. 2012 Nov;108(1):100-4. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2012.08.018. Epub 2012 Sep 10.
6
Scale up of a multi-strategic intervention to increase implementation of a school healthy canteen policy: findings of an intervention trial.多策略干预措施的扩大实施以增加学校健康食堂政策的执行:干预试验的结果。
BMC Public Health. 2018 Jul 11;18(1):860. doi: 10.1186/s12889-018-5786-x.
7
Objective assessment of compliance with a state-wide school food-service policy via menu audits.通过菜单审计对全州学校餐饮服务政策的遵守情况进行客观评估。
Public Health Nutr. 2019 Jun;22(9):1696-1703. doi: 10.1017/S1368980019000156. Epub 2019 Feb 22.
8
Scoping study investigating stakeholder perceptions and use of school canteens in an Australian city.一项范围研究,调查澳大利亚城市中利益相关者对学校食堂的看法和使用情况。
Nutr Diet. 2017 Nov;74(5):502-508. doi: 10.1111/1747-0080.12363. Epub 2017 Jun 28.
9
Qualitative multi-stakeholder evaluation of the adoption, implementation and sustainment of the school-based dietary intervention "Jump-in".基于利益相关者的定性评价:学校饮食干预“Jump-in”的采纳、实施和持续情况。
BMC Public Health. 2024 May 17;24(1):1337. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-18814-1.
10
Wisconsin School Wellness Policies after Federal Legislation Change: Understanding Key Mechanisms of Policy Improvement.威斯康星州学校健康政策在联邦立法变革后的发展:理解政策改善的关键机制。
J Acad Nutr Diet. 2021 May;121(5):872-882. doi: 10.1016/j.jand.2020.08.082. Epub 2020 Nov 10.

引用本文的文献

1
School food and nutrition environments in Australian primary schools: A scoping review.澳大利亚小学的学校饮食与营养环境:一项范围综述。
PLoS One. 2025 Jul 1;20(7):e0327310. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0327310. eCollection 2025.
2
Acceptability of policies targeting dietary behaviours and physical activity: a systematic review of tools and outcomes.针对饮食行为和身体活动的政策的可接受性:工具和结果的系统评价。
Eur J Public Health. 2022 Nov 28;32(Suppl 4):iv32-iv49. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckac053.

本文引用的文献

1
Availability of food and beverage items on school canteen menus and association with items purchased by children of primary-school age.学校食堂菜单上的食物和饮料供应情况与小学生购买的食物之间的关联。
Public Health Nutr. 2018 Oct;21(15):2907-2914. doi: 10.1017/S1368980018001726. Epub 2018 Aug 2.
2
Scale up of a multi-strategic intervention to increase implementation of a school healthy canteen policy: findings of an intervention trial.多策略干预措施的扩大实施以增加学校健康食堂政策的执行:干预试验的结果。
BMC Public Health. 2018 Jul 11;18(1):860. doi: 10.1186/s12889-018-5786-x.
3
It's just the right thing to do: Conceptualizing a theory of change for a school food and beverage sales environment interv ention and implications for implementation evaluation.这是正确的做法:为学校食品和饮料销售环境干预构建变革理论及其对实施评估的启示。
Eval Program Plann. 2018 Oct;70:73-82. doi: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2018.04.011. Epub 2018 Apr 30.
4
Relative contributions of recommended food environment policies to improve population nutrition: results from a Delphi study with international food policy experts.推荐的食品环境政策对改善人口营养的相对贡献:一项国际食品政策专家德尔菲研究的结果。
Public Health Nutr. 2018 Aug;21(11):2142-2148. doi: 10.1017/S1368980018001076. Epub 2018 May 2.
5
Position of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics, Society for Nutrition Education and Behavior, and School Nutrition Association: Comprehensive Nutrition Programs and Services in Schools.美国营养与饮食学会、营养教育与行为学会和学校营养师协会的立场声明:学校全面营养计划与服务
J Acad Nutr Diet. 2018 May;118(5):913-919. doi: 10.1016/j.jand.2018.03.005.
6
Effectiveness of school food environment policies on children's dietary behaviors: A systematic review and meta-analysis.学校食品环境政策对儿童饮食行为的影响:系统评价和荟萃分析。
PLoS One. 2018 Mar 29;13(3):e0194555. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0194555. eCollection 2018.
7
Economic analysis of three interventions of different intensity in improving school implementation of a government healthy canteen policy in Australia: costs, incremental and relative cost effectiveness.三种不同强度干预措施改善澳大利亚政府健康食堂政策在学校执行情况的经济分析:成本、增量和相对成本效益。
BMC Public Health. 2018 Mar 20;18(1):378. doi: 10.1186/s12889-018-5315-y.
8
Stakeholder perceptions of a school food policy ten years on.利益相关者对学校食品政策十年的看法。
Public Health Nutr. 2018 May;21(7):1370-1374. doi: 10.1017/S1368980017003962. Epub 2018 Jan 24.
9
Measuring the Implementation of a School Wellness Policy.衡量学校健康政策的实施情况。
J Sch Health. 2017 Oct;87(10):760-768. doi: 10.1111/josh.12548.
10
Successes and Challenges in School Meal Reform: Qualitative Insights From Food Service Directors.学校膳食改革的成功与挑战:来自食品服务主管的定性见解
J Sch Health. 2017 Aug;87(8):608-615. doi: 10.1111/josh.12534.

欲壑难填:关键利益相关者对更严格的学校食品政策的支持。

Hungry for more: key stakeholders' support for more stringent school food policies.

机构信息

1School of Psychology,Curtin University,Kent Street,Bentley,WA 6102,Australia.

2Western Australian School Canteen Association,East Perth,Western Australia,Australia.

出版信息

Public Health Nutr. 2019 Jun;22(8):1483-1491. doi: 10.1017/S1368980018003919. Epub 2019 Feb 8.

DOI:10.1017/S1368980018003919
PMID:30732663
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10260884/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

School food policies are an important component of comprehensive strategies to address child obesity and improve children's health. Evaluations have demonstrated that these policies can be initially well accepted and appropriately implemented, however little is known about how acceptance levels may change over time. The present study aimed to re-evaluate a school food policy 10 years after its introduction to assess key stakeholders' support for various policy extensions that would strengthen the scope of the policy.

DESIGN

Online surveys administered 1 year after policy introduction (n 607, 2008) and 10 years after policy introduction (n 307, 2016).

SETTING

Western Australia.ParticipantsSchool principals, teachers, canteen managers and presidents of parents & citizens associations from Western Australian Government primary schools.

RESULTS

At both time points, and especially at time 2 (10 years post policy implementation), high levels of support were reported for the policy and possible policy extensions. Support was strongest for an additional requirement to integrate the canteen menu with the classroom health curriculum.

CONCLUSIONS

The results suggest that once a policy has become embedded into school practices, stakeholders may be receptive to modifications that strengthen the policy to enhance its potential effects on children's diets.

摘要

目的

学校食品政策是解决儿童肥胖问题和改善儿童健康的综合策略的重要组成部分。评估表明,这些政策最初可以得到很好的接受和适当的实施,然而,对于接受程度如何随时间变化知之甚少。本研究旨在重新评估学校食品政策 10 年后,以评估主要利益相关者对各种政策扩展的支持程度,这些扩展将加强政策的范围。

设计

政策实施 1 年后(n=607,2008 年)和政策实施 10 年后(n=307,2016 年)进行在线调查。

地点

西澳大利亚州。

参与者

西澳大利亚州政府小学的校长、教师、食堂经理和家长与公民协会主席。

结果

在两个时间点,尤其是在政策实施 10 年后的时间 2,报告了对政策和可能的政策扩展的高度支持。对额外要求将食堂菜单与课堂健康课程整合的支持最为强烈。

结论

结果表明,一旦政策已经融入学校实践,利益相关者可能会接受加强政策的修改,以增强其对儿童饮食的潜在影响。