• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Stakeholder perceptions of a school food policy ten years on.利益相关者对学校食品政策十年的看法。
Public Health Nutr. 2018 May;21(7):1370-1374. doi: 10.1017/S1368980017003962. Epub 2018 Jan 24.
2
Stakeholder perceptions of a comprehensive school food policy in Western Australia.西澳大利亚全面学校食品政策的利益相关者认知。
Health Policy. 2012 Nov;108(1):100-4. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2012.08.018. Epub 2012 Sep 10.
3
Hungry for more: key stakeholders' support for more stringent school food policies.欲壑难填:关键利益相关者对更严格的学校食品政策的支持。
Public Health Nutr. 2019 Jun;22(8):1483-1491. doi: 10.1017/S1368980018003919. Epub 2019 Feb 8.
4
Assessment of the School Nutrition Environment: A Study in Australian Primary School Canteens.学校营养环境评估:一项关于澳大利亚小学食堂的研究。
Am J Prev Med. 2015 Aug;49(2):215-22. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2015.02.002. Epub 2015 Jun 16.
5
Scoping study investigating stakeholder perceptions and use of school canteens in an Australian city.一项范围研究,调查澳大利亚城市中利益相关者对学校食堂的看法和使用情况。
Nutr Diet. 2017 Nov;74(5):502-508. doi: 10.1111/1747-0080.12363. Epub 2017 Jun 28.
6
Objective assessment of compliance with a state-wide school food-service policy via menu audits.通过菜单审计对全州学校餐饮服务政策的遵守情况进行客观评估。
Public Health Nutr. 2019 Jun;22(9):1696-1703. doi: 10.1017/S1368980019000156. Epub 2019 Feb 22.
7
Predictors of positive outcomes of a school food provision policy in Australia.澳大利亚学校食品供应政策积极成果的预测因素。
Health Promot Int. 2014 Jun;29(2):317-27. doi: 10.1093/heapro/das075. Epub 2013 Jan 7.
8
Scale up of a multi-strategic intervention to increase implementation of a school healthy canteen policy: findings of an intervention trial.多策略干预措施的扩大实施以增加学校健康食堂政策的执行:干预试验的结果。
BMC Public Health. 2018 Jul 11;18(1):860. doi: 10.1186/s12889-018-5786-x.
9
School food policy at Dutch primary schools: room for improvement? Cross-sectional findings from the INPACT study.荷兰小学的学校食品政策:有改进的空间吗?INPACT 研究的横断面发现。
BMC Public Health. 2013 Apr 12;13:339. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-13-339.
10
Parents' and Teachers' Views of Food Environments and Policies in Indian Private Secondary Schools.印度私立中学的家长和教师对食物环境和政策的看法。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 Jul 19;15(7):1532. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15071532.

引用本文的文献

1
Assessment of School Food Policy Influencing Nutritional Behaviour of Adolescents from the Perspective of School Stakeholders in Ibadan, Oyo State.从奥约州伊巴丹市学校利益相关者的角度评估影响青少年营养行为的学校食品政策
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2025 May 31;22(6):866. doi: 10.3390/ijerph22060866.
2
Implementing Food Environment Policies at Scale: What Helps? What Hinders? A Systematic Review of Barriers and Enablers.大规模实施食品环境政策:有哪些帮助?有哪些阻碍?对障碍和促进因素的系统回顾。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Sep 30;18(19):10346. doi: 10.3390/ijerph181910346.
3
Secondary school canteens in Australia: analysis of canteen menus from a repeated cross-sectional national survey.澳大利亚中学食堂:来自一项重复横断面全国调查的食堂菜单分析
Public Health Nutr. 2020 Oct 7;24(4):1-10. doi: 10.1017/S1368980020003535.
4
Objective assessment of compliance with a state-wide school food-service policy via menu audits.通过菜单审计对全州学校餐饮服务政策的遵守情况进行客观评估。
Public Health Nutr. 2019 Jun;22(9):1696-1703. doi: 10.1017/S1368980019000156. Epub 2019 Feb 22.
5
Hungry for more: key stakeholders' support for more stringent school food policies.欲壑难填:关键利益相关者对更严格的学校食品政策的支持。
Public Health Nutr. 2019 Jun;22(8):1483-1491. doi: 10.1017/S1368980018003919. Epub 2019 Feb 8.

本文引用的文献

1
Community perspectives on the use of regulation and law for obesity prevention in children: A citizens' jury.社区对利用监管和法律预防儿童肥胖的看法:公民陪审团。
Health Policy. 2017 May;121(5):566-573. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2017.03.001. Epub 2017 Mar 12.
2
The provision of healthy food in a school tuck shop: does it influence primary-school students' perceptions, attitudes and behaviours towards healthy eating?学校小卖部提供健康食品:这会影响小学生对健康饮食的认知、态度和行为吗?
Public Health Nutr. 2017 May;20(7):1257-1266. doi: 10.1017/S1368980016003487. Epub 2017 Jan 18.
3
The Effect of State Competitive Food and Beverage Regulations on Childhood Overweight and Obesity.州级食品和饮料竞争法规对儿童超重和肥胖的影响。
J Adolesc Health. 2017 May;60(5):520-527. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2016.09.003. Epub 2016 Nov 9.
4
Assessment of the School Nutrition Environment: A Study in Australian Primary School Canteens.学校营养环境评估:一项关于澳大利亚小学食堂的研究。
Am J Prev Med. 2015 Aug;49(2):215-22. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2015.02.002. Epub 2015 Jun 16.
5
Improvement in primary school adherence to the NSW Healthy School Canteen Strategy in 2007 and 2010.2007年和2010年新南威尔士州小学对健康学校食堂策略的依从性有所提高。
Health Promot J Austr. 2015 Aug;26(2):89-92. doi: 10.1071/HE14098.
6
Smart food policies for obesity prevention.智能食品政策预防肥胖。
Lancet. 2015 Jun 13;385(9985):2410-21. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)61745-1. Epub 2015 Feb 19.
7
School nutrition guidelines: overview of the implementation and evaluation.学校营养指南:实施与评估概述
Public Health Nutr. 2015 Jun;18(9):1582-92. doi: 10.1017/S1368980014003310. Epub 2015 Feb 9.
8
Did school food and nutrient-based standards in England impact on 11-12Y olds nutrient intake at lunchtime and in total diet? Repeat cross-sectional study.英国基于学校食物和营养素的标准是否会影响11至12岁儿童午餐时间以及总体饮食中的营养素摄入量?重复横断面研究。
PLoS One. 2014 Nov 19;9(11):e112648. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0112648. eCollection 2014.
9
Australian school canteens: menu guideline adherence or avoidance?澳大利亚学校食堂:遵循还是避开菜单指南?
Health Promot J Austr. 2014 Aug;25(2):110-5. doi: 10.1071/HE14009.
10
Implementation research: what it is and how to do it.实施研究:是什么以及如何开展
BMJ. 2013 Nov 20;347:f6753. doi: 10.1136/bmj.f6753.

利益相关者对学校食品政策十年的看法。

Stakeholder perceptions of a school food policy ten years on.

机构信息

1School of Psychology,Curtin University,Kent Street,Bentley,WA 6102,Australia.

2WA School Canteen Association (Inc.),East Perth,Australia.

出版信息

Public Health Nutr. 2018 May;21(7):1370-1374. doi: 10.1017/S1368980017003962. Epub 2018 Jan 24.

DOI:10.1017/S1368980017003962
PMID:29362010
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10261569/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To assess (i) the extent to which stakeholders have accepted and implemented a Healthy Food and Drink Policy for schools a decade after its introduction and (ii) any resulting implications for canteen profitability.

DESIGN

Online survey distributed via electronic newsletter to school principals.

SETTING

Western Australian public schools.

SUBJECTS

Principals, teachers, canteen managers, and parents and citizens committee presidents (n 307).

RESULTS

Large majorities of respondents reported that the policy has made the foods and drinks provided in schools healthier (85 %) and that the policy constitutes a good opportunity to teach children about healthy eating (90 %). Only small proportions of respondents felt it had been difficult to implement the policy in their schools (13 %) or that the policy fails to accommodate parents' rights to choose the foods consumed by their children (16 %). Most of the policy outcomes assessed in both the initial post-implementation evaluation (2008) and the 10-year follow-up evaluation (2016) demonstrated significant improvement over time.

CONCLUSIONS

The study results indicate that comprehensive school food policies can favourably influence the foods and drinks provided on school premises and can be highly acceptable to key stakeholders, without adversely affecting profitability. The results are encouraging for policy makers in other jurisdictions considering the implementation of similar policies.

摘要

目的

评估(i)在引入学校健康食品和饮料政策十年后,利益相关者对其接受和实施的程度,以及(ii)这对食堂盈利能力的任何影响。

设计

通过电子时事通讯向校长分发在线调查。

地点

西澳大利亚公立学校。

对象

校长、教师、食堂经理、家长和公民委员会主席(n=307)。

结果

绝大多数受访者报告称,该政策使学校提供的食品和饮料更健康(85%),并且该政策是一个很好的机会,可以教孩子们健康饮食(90%)。只有少数受访者认为在他们的学校实施该政策有困难(13%),或者该政策未能满足家长为孩子选择所消费食物的权利(16%)。在初始实施后评估(2008 年)和 10 年随访评估(2016 年)中评估的大多数政策结果都表明,随着时间的推移,这些结果都有显著改善。

结论

研究结果表明,全面的学校食品政策可以有利地影响学校内提供的食品和饮料,并且可以得到主要利益相关者的高度认可,而不会对盈利能力产生不利影响。这些结果令人鼓舞,可供其他司法管辖区的政策制定者考虑实施类似政策。