Kikawa Yuichiro, Kotake Takeshi, Kajiwara Yukiko, Hashimoto Kazuki, Yamashiro Hiroyasu, Ohtani Shoichiro, Takao Shintaro, Toi Masakazu
Department of Breast Surgery, Kobe City Medical Center General Hospital, Kobe, Japan.
Department of Breast Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.
Breast Cancer (Auckl). 2019 Jan 22;13:1178223418825135. doi: 10.1177/1178223418825135. eCollection 2019.
To investigate the clinical predictive factors for the efficacy of everolimus (EVE) for advanced/metastatic breast cancer (AMBC).
Routine practice data of consecutive patients with AMBC who received EVE at 5 institutions in western Japan were retrospectively analyzed in this cohort study (study registration no.: UMIN 000032569). The correlation among time to treatment failure (TTF), overall survival (OS), and clinical background was investigated via univariate and multivariate analyses using Cox hazards model for the clinically important variables.
A total of 134 patients were included in the analysis. The median TTF and OS were 5.2 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 4.1-6.4) and 27.3 months (95% CI: 23.7-30.9), respectively. Multivariate analysis showed that dose reduction of EVE from any initial dose was associated with a longer TTF (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.52; 95% CI: 0.32-0.84, = .007). Meanwhile, very low hormone sensitivity (ie, relapse within the first 2 years during adjuvant endocrine therapy or progression within 3 months of endocrine therapy immediately before EVE) was associated with a shorter TTF (HR: 2.48; 95% CI: 1.49-4.10, < .001). In the analysis of stratified treatment outcomes, TTF was longer in the group with <3 liver metastases and in groups other than the very low hormone sensitivity group, regardless of the treatment line of EVE.
Low hormone sensitivity and ⩾3 liver metastases were important prognostic factors for the efficacy of EVE. EVE may be less effective in patients with AMBC with these factors, and as such, chemotherapy should be administered instead.
探讨依维莫司(EVE)治疗晚期/转移性乳腺癌(AMBC)疗效的临床预测因素。
在这项队列研究中,对日本西部5家机构接受EVE治疗的连续AMBC患者的常规实践数据进行回顾性分析(研究注册号:UMIN 000032569)。使用Cox风险模型对临床重要变量进行单因素和多因素分析,研究治疗失败时间(TTF)、总生存期(OS)与临床背景之间的相关性。
共134例患者纳入分析。中位TTF和OS分别为5.2个月(95%置信区间[CI]:4.1 - 6.4)和27.3个月(95% CI:23.7 - 30.9)。多因素分析显示,EVE从任何初始剂量开始减量与更长的TTF相关(风险比[HR]:0.52;95% CI:0.32 - 0.84,P = 0.007)。同时,极低的激素敏感性(即辅助内分泌治疗的前2年内复发或在EVE治疗前内分泌治疗的3个月内进展)与较短的TTF相关(HR:2.48;95% CI:1.49 - 4.10,P < 0.001)。在分层治疗结果分析中,无论EVE的治疗线如何,肝转移<3个的组和极低激素敏感性组以外的组TTF更长。
低激素敏感性和≥3个肝转移是EVE疗效的重要预后因素。具有这些因素的AMBC患者中EVE可能疗效较差,因此应改用化疗。