Hamacher Daniel, Liebl Dominik, Hödl Claudia, Heßler Veronika, Kniewasser Christoph K, Thönnessen Thomas, Zech Astrid
Institute of Sport Science, Friedrich Schiller University of Jena, Jena, Germany.
Department of Statistics, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Front Physiol. 2019 Jan 24;9:1955. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2018.01955. eCollection 2018.
A stable gait pattern is a prerequisite to successfully master various activities of daily living. Furthermore, reduced gait stability is associated with a higher risk of falling. To provide specific intervention strategies to improve gait stability, gaining detailed knowledge of the underlying mechanism and influencing factors is of utmost importance. The effects of relevant influencing factors on gait stability are poorly examined, yet. Therefore, the aim of the current study was to quantify the effects of various influencing factors on gait stability. In a cross-sectional study, we assessed dynamic gait stability and relevant influencing factors in 102 older adults (age >65 years). In addition to dynamic gait stability (largest Lyapunov exponent [LLE] and gait variability measures) during normal over-ground (single-task: ST) and dual-task (DT) walking, we registered the following influencing factors: health status (SF12), pain status (painDETECT, SES), fear of falling (falls efficacy scale), depression (CES-D), cognition performance (Stroop test), physical activity (Freiburger Fragebogen zur körperlichen Aktivität), proprioception (joint position sense), peripheral sensation (mechanical and vibration detection threshold), balance performance (static balance on force plate) and muscular fitness (instrumented sit-to-stand test). We used a principal components regression to link the identified principal components with the gait stability and gait variability responses. The four principal components "strength and gender" (e.g., = 0.001 for LLE during ST), "physical activity" (e.g., = 0.006 for LLE during ST), "pain" (e.g., = 0.030 for LLE during DT) and "peripheral sensation" (e.g., = 0.002 for LLE during ST) were each significantly associated with at least two of the analyzed gait stability/variability measures. The dimension "balance" was a significant predictor in only one gait measure. While "proprioception" tends to correlate with a gait variability measure, we did not find a dependency of mental health on any gait measure. In conclusion, the participants' ability to recover from small perturbations (as measured with the largest Lyapunov exponent) seems to be related to gender and strength, the amount of physical activity the participants spent every week, peripheral sensation and pain status. Since the explained variance is still rather low, there could be more relevant factors that were not addressed, yet.
稳定的步态模式是成功掌握各种日常生活活动的前提条件。此外,步态稳定性降低与更高的跌倒风险相关。为了提供改善步态稳定性的具体干预策略,深入了解其潜在机制和影响因素至关重要。然而,相关影响因素对步态稳定性的影响目前研究较少。因此,本研究的目的是量化各种影响因素对步态稳定性的影响。在一项横断面研究中,我们评估了102名老年人(年龄>65岁)的动态步态稳定性及相关影响因素。除了正常地面行走(单任务:ST)和双任务(DT)行走时的动态步态稳定性(最大Lyapunov指数[LLE]和步态变异性指标)外,我们还记录了以下影响因素:健康状况(SF12)、疼痛状况(painDETECT,SES)、跌倒恐惧(跌倒效能量表)、抑郁(CES-D)、认知表现(Stroop测试)、身体活动(弗莱堡身体活动问卷)、本体感觉(关节位置觉)、外周感觉(机械和振动检测阈值)、平衡能力(测力台上的静态平衡)和肌肉适能(仪器化坐立试验)。我们使用主成分回归将识别出的主成分与步态稳定性和步态变异性反应联系起来。四个主成分“力量和性别”(例如,ST期间LLE的 = 0.001)、“身体活动”(例如,ST期间LLE的 = 0.006)、“疼痛”(例如,DT期间LLE的 = 0.030)和“外周感觉”(例如,ST期间LLE的 = 0.002)各自至少与两种分析的步态稳定性/变异性指标显著相关。“平衡”维度仅在一种步态指标中是显著预测因子。虽然“本体感觉”倾向于与一种步态变异性指标相关,但我们未发现心理健康与任何步态指标存在相关性。总之,参与者从小扰动中恢复的能力(用最大Lyapunov指数衡量)似乎与性别、力量、参与者每周的身体活动量、外周感觉和疼痛状况有关。由于解释的方差仍然相当低,可能还有更多相关因素尚未涉及。