Schepisi Michael, Porciello Giuseppina, Bufalari Ilaria, Aglioti Salvatore Maria, Panasiti Maria Serena
Department of Psychology, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
IRCCS, Santa Lucia Foundation, Rome, Italy.
Front Psychol. 2019 Jan 24;10:26. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00026. eCollection 2019.
Using different evaluation targets (i.e., politicians' pictures, ideological words, items referring to features attributed to political ingroup/outgroup) we characterized the intergroup bias among political groups in the Italian context (Study 1-2-3) and tested a model that may account for the bias itself (Study 3). For all evaluation targets, left-wing participants - compared to right-wing participants - showed a greater intergroup bias, expressing more negative emotions toward the outgroup. The process was influenced by a greater perceived threat of the outgroup. Conversely, right-wing participants expressed the bias only when presented with ideological words. Our results provide a detailed description of how intergroup bias in Italy is differently expressed by the two ideological groups depending on the targets used to represent the political counterpart. Moreover, the results show that the stronger bias expressed by left-wing participants is driven by perceived threat of the outgroup.
我们使用不同的评估指标(即政治家图片、意识形态词汇、涉及政治内群体/外群体特征的项目)来刻画意大利背景下政治群体间的群体间偏见(研究1 - 2 - 3),并测试了一个可能解释这种偏见本身的模型(研究3)。对于所有评估指标,与右翼参与者相比,左翼参与者表现出更大的群体间偏见,对外群体表达了更多负面情绪。这一过程受到对外群体更大感知威胁的影响。相反,右翼参与者仅在看到意识形态词汇时才表现出这种偏见。我们的研究结果详细描述了意大利的两个意识形态群体如何根据用于代表政治对手的指标不同地表达群体间偏见。此外,结果表明,左翼参与者表现出的更强偏见是由对外群体的感知威胁驱动的。