Van Assche Jasper
Department of Developmental, Personality and Social Psychology, Ghent University, BE.
Psychol Belg. 2019 Jan 23;59(1):33-49. doi: 10.5334/pb.465.
Intergroup relations represent one of the most difficult and complex knots which we are confronted with in contemporary society. Given that intergroup dynamics permeate all spheres of our daily social lives, it seems vital to systematically investigate how to best predict and explain when, why, and for whom intergroup relations symbolize conflict rather than harmony. This critical review evaluates how the societal context in which individuals live shapes how their personal social-ideological views, their values, norms and beliefs, are associated with their intergroup and related attitudes. Such an approach not only examines psychological/individual and sociological/contextual levels of analysis simultaneously, it also assesses how both work together (i.e., interact) in influencing intergroup relations across various domains of life. In sum, I found that adopting a person × context interaction approach yields interesting and more profound insights in individuals' attitudes towards ethnicity-, gender, and age-based outgroups, their specifisc expressions of ethnic prejudice (e.g., outgroup negativity, outgroup threat, intergroup contact, and trust within and between ethnic-cultural groups), and even their political attitudes, political party support, neighborhood attitudes and moving intentions.
群体间关系是当代社会中我们所面临的最棘手、最复杂的问题之一。鉴于群体间动态贯穿于我们日常社会生活的各个领域,系统地研究如何最好地预测和解释群体间关系在何时、为何以及对何人而言象征着冲突而非和谐,似乎至关重要。这篇批判性综述评估了个体所处的社会环境如何塑造其个人的社会意识形态观点、价值观、规范和信仰,并将其与群体间及相关态度联系起来。这种方法不仅同时考察了心理/个体层面和社会学/背景层面的分析,还评估了两者如何共同作用(即相互影响),以在生活的各个领域中影响群体间关系。总之,我发现采用人×情境交互作用的方法,能在个体对基于种族、性别和年龄的外群体的态度、他们对种族偏见的具体表现(如外群体负面评价、外群体威胁、群体间接触以及种族文化群体内部和之间的信任),甚至他们的政治态度、政党支持、邻里态度和迁移意愿等方面产生有趣且更深刻的见解。