• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

痰液中DNA提取不同条件的比较——一项初步研究。

Comparison of different conditions for DNA extraction in sputum - a pilot study.

作者信息

Oriano Martina, Terranova Leonardo, Teri Antonio, Sottotetti Samantha, Ruggiero Luca, Tafuro Camilla, Marchisio Paola, Gramegna Andrea, Amati Francesco, Nava Fabrizio, Franceschi Elisa, Cariani Lisa, Blasi Francesco, Aliberti Stefano

机构信息

1University of Milan, Department of Pathophysiology and Transplantation, Via Francesco Sforza 35, 20122 Milan, Italy.

3University of Pavia, Department of Molecular Medicine, Pavia, Italy.

出版信息

Multidiscip Respir Med. 2019 Jan 31;14:6. doi: 10.1186/s40248-018-0166-z. eCollection 2019.

DOI:10.1186/s40248-018-0166-z
PMID:30733864
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6357456/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The analysis of microbiome in respiratory samples is a topic of great interest in chronic respiratory diseases. The method used to prepare sputum samples for microbiome analysis is very heterogeneous. The selection of the most suitable methodology for DNA extraction is fundamental to have the most representative data. The objective of this study was to compare different conditions for DNA extraction from sputum in adult patients with bronchiectasis.

METHODS

Five sputum samples from bronchiectasis patients were collected at the Policlinico Hospital in Milan, Italy. Eighteen conditions for DNA extraction were compared, including two enzyme-based (Roche and Zymo) and one beads-based (Mobio) technique. These techniques were tested with/without Dithiothreitol (DTT) and with/without lysostaphin (0.18 and 0.36 mg/mL) step. DNA was quantified, tested using Real-time PCR for 16S rDNA and and, then, microbiome was evaluated.

RESULTS

Although 16S rDNA was similarly detected across all the different techniques, Roche kit gave the highest DNA yield. The lowest Ct values for Real-time PCR for was identified when lysostaphin was added. Considering genera from microbiome, alpha diversity indices did not show any significant differences between techniques, while relative abundances were more similar in presence of DTT.

CONCLUSIONS

None of the conditions emerged to be superior to the others even if enzyme-based kits seem to be needed in order to have a higher extraction yield.

摘要

背景

呼吸道样本中的微生物组分析是慢性呼吸道疾病中备受关注的一个话题。用于制备痰液样本以进行微生物组分析的方法非常多样。选择最适合的DNA提取方法对于获得最具代表性的数据至关重要。本研究的目的是比较成年支气管扩张症患者痰液DNA提取的不同条件。

方法

在意大利米兰的Policlinico医院收集了5份支气管扩张症患者的痰液样本。比较了18种DNA提取条件,包括两种基于酶的方法(罗氏和Zymo)和一种基于磁珠的方法(Mobio)。这些方法在有/无二硫苏糖醇(DTT)以及有/无溶葡萄球菌素(0.18和0.36 mg/mL)步骤的情况下进行测试。对DNA进行定量,使用实时PCR检测16S rDNA,然后评估微生物组。

结果

尽管在所有不同方法中均能类似地检测到16S rDNA,但罗氏试剂盒的DNA产量最高。添加溶葡萄球菌素时,实时PCR的最低Ct值被确定。考虑微生物组的属,各方法之间的α多样性指数没有显示出任何显著差异,而在存在DTT的情况下相对丰度更为相似。

结论

即使似乎需要基于酶的试剂盒以获得更高的提取产量,但没有一种条件明显优于其他条件。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/814d/6357456/30d673f3c282/40248_2018_166_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/814d/6357456/9f1acf9ad24d/40248_2018_166_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/814d/6357456/4eb715241380/40248_2018_166_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/814d/6357456/fbeb587a5975/40248_2018_166_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/814d/6357456/030796ab2144/40248_2018_166_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/814d/6357456/30d673f3c282/40248_2018_166_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/814d/6357456/9f1acf9ad24d/40248_2018_166_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/814d/6357456/4eb715241380/40248_2018_166_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/814d/6357456/fbeb587a5975/40248_2018_166_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/814d/6357456/030796ab2144/40248_2018_166_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/814d/6357456/30d673f3c282/40248_2018_166_Fig5_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Comparison of different conditions for DNA extraction in sputum - a pilot study.痰液中DNA提取不同条件的比较——一项初步研究。
Multidiscip Respir Med. 2019 Jan 31;14:6. doi: 10.1186/s40248-018-0166-z. eCollection 2019.
2
How to Process Sputum Samples and Extract Bacterial DNA for Microbiota Analysis.如何处理痰液样本并提取细菌 DNA 进行微生物组分析。
Int J Mol Sci. 2018 Oct 20;19(10):3256. doi: 10.3390/ijms19103256.
3
Evaluation of Methods for the Extraction of Microbial DNA From Vaginal Swabs Used for Microbiome Studies.用于宏基因组研究的阴道拭子中微生物 DNA 提取方法的评估。
Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2019 Jun 6;9:197. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2019.00197. eCollection 2019.
4
Combined bacterial and fungal targeted amplicon sequencing of respiratory samples: Does the DNA extraction method matter?联合细菌和真菌靶向扩增子测序呼吸道样本:DNA 提取方法重要吗?
PLoS One. 2020 Apr 28;15(4):e0232215. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0232215. eCollection 2020.
5
Sputum neutrophil elastase associates with microbiota and in bronchiectasis.痰液中性粒细胞弹性蛋白酶与支气管扩张症中的微生物群相关。
Eur Respir J. 2020 Oct 22;56(4). doi: 10.1183/13993003.00769-2020. Print 2020 Oct.
6
Comparison of Meconium DNA Extraction Methods for Use in Microbiome Studies.用于微生物组研究的胎粪DNA提取方法比较
Front Microbiol. 2018 Feb 20;9:270. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2018.00270. eCollection 2018.
7
The sputum microbiome and clinical outcomes in patients with bronchiectasis: a prospective observational study.支气管扩张症患者的痰微生物组与临床结局:一项前瞻性观察研究。
Lancet Respir Med. 2021 Aug;9(8):885-896. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(20)30557-9. Epub 2021 May 4.
8
[The use of 16S rDNA sequencing in species diversity analysis for sputum of patients with ventilator-associated pneumonia].[16S rDNA测序在呼吸机相关性肺炎患者痰液物种多样性分析中的应用]
Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2014 May;26(5):294-9. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.2095-4352.2014.05.002.
9
Differences of lung microbiome in patients with clinically stable and exacerbated bronchiectasis.临床稳定期和加重期支气管扩张症患者肺部微生物群的差异
PLoS One. 2017 Aug 22;12(8):e0183553. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0183553. eCollection 2017.
10
Longitudinal Associations of the Cystic Fibrosis Airway Microbiome and Volatile Metabolites: A Case Study.囊性纤维化气道微生物群与挥发性代谢物的纵向关联:一项案例研究。
Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2020 Apr 28;10:174. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2020.00174. eCollection 2020.

引用本文的文献

1
Metrological evaluation of DNA extraction method effects on the bacterial microbiome and resistome in sputum.对痰液中细菌微生物组和耐药组的 DNA 提取方法效果进行计量评估。
mSystems. 2024 Sep 17;9(9):e0073524. doi: 10.1128/msystems.00735-24. Epub 2024 Aug 16.
2
Pro-resolving and pro-inflammatory fatty acid-derived mediators in sputum of stable state bronchiectasis patients.稳定期支气管扩张症患者痰液中促消退和促炎脂肪酸衍生介质。
Respir Res. 2022 Dec 20;23(1):363. doi: 10.1186/s12931-022-02301-5.
3
Systematic Cross-biospecimen Evaluation of DNA Extraction Kits for Long- and Short-read Multi-metagenomic Sequencing Studies.

本文引用的文献

1
Antibiotic exposure and interpersonal variance mask the effect of ivacaftor on respiratory microbiota composition.抗生素暴露和个体间差异掩盖了 ivacaftor 对呼吸微生物群落组成的影响。
J Cyst Fibros. 2018 Jan;17(1):50-56. doi: 10.1016/j.jcf.2017.08.002. Epub 2017 Oct 15.
2
Mechanistic insight into the function of the microbiome in lung diseases.微生物组在肺部疾病中的功能的机制见解。
Eur Respir J. 2017 Sep 11;50(3). doi: 10.1183/13993003.02467-2016. Print 2017 Sep.
3
16S rRNA gene sequencing reveals site-specific signatures of the upper and lower airways of cystic fibrosis patients.
长读和短读多宏基因组测序研究中 DNA 提取试剂盒的系统跨生物标本评估。
Genomics Proteomics Bioinformatics. 2022 Apr;20(2):405-417. doi: 10.1016/j.gpb.2022.05.006. Epub 2022 Jun 6.
4
Identifying Bacterial Airways Infection in Stable Severe Asthma Using Oxford Nanopore Sequencing Technologies.利用牛津纳米孔测序技术鉴定稳定期重度哮喘患者的气道细菌感染。
Microbiol Spectr. 2022 Apr 27;10(2):e0227921. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.02279-21. Epub 2022 Mar 24.
5
The biology of pulmonary exacerbations in bronchiectasis.支气管扩张症肺部恶化的生物学。
Eur Respir Rev. 2019 Nov 20;28(154). doi: 10.1183/16000617.0055-2019. Print 2019 Dec 31.
6
Optimizing microbiome sequencing for small intestinal aspirates: validation of novel techniques through the REIMAGINE study.优化小肠抽吸物的微生物组测序:通过 REIMAGINE 研究验证新方法。
BMC Microbiol. 2019 Nov 1;19(1):239. doi: 10.1186/s12866-019-1617-1.
16S rRNA 基因测序揭示囊性纤维化患者上下呼吸道的特定部位特征。
J Cyst Fibros. 2018 Mar;17(2):204-212. doi: 10.1016/j.jcf.2017.08.007. Epub 2017 Aug 18.
4
Zearalenone adsorption capacity of lactic acid bacteria isolated from pigs.从猪体内分离出的乳酸菌对玉米赤霉烯酮的吸附能力
Braz J Microbiol. 2017 Oct-Dec;48(4):715-723. doi: 10.1016/j.bjm.2017.05.001. Epub 2017 May 27.
5
Impact of enzymatic digestion on bacterial community composition in CF airway samples.酶消化对囊性纤维化气道样本中细菌群落组成的影响。
PeerJ. 2017 May 30;5:e3362. doi: 10.7717/peerj.3362. eCollection 2017.
6
VSEARCH: a versatile open source tool for metagenomics.VSEARCH:一款用于宏基因组学的多功能开源工具。
PeerJ. 2016 Oct 18;4:e2584. doi: 10.7717/peerj.2584. eCollection 2016.
7
Clinical Next Generation Sequencing Outperforms Standard Microbiological Culture for Characterizing Polymicrobial Samples.临床二代测序比标准微生物培养更能鉴定混合样本中的微生物。
Clin Chem. 2016 Nov;62(11):1465-1473. doi: 10.1373/clinchem.2016.258806. Epub 2016 Sep 13.
8
MultiQC: summarize analysis results for multiple tools and samples in a single report.MultiQC:在一份报告中汇总多个工具和样本的分析结果。
Bioinformatics. 2016 Oct 1;32(19):3047-8. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btw354. Epub 2016 Jun 16.
9
Development of two real-time multiplex PCR assays for the detection and quantification of eight key bacterial pathogens in lower respiratory tract infections.开发两种实时多重PCR检测方法,用于检测和定量下呼吸道感染中的八种关键细菌病原体。
Clin Microbiol Infect. 2015 Aug;21(8):788.e1-788.e13. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2015.05.004. Epub 2015 May 14.
10
Polymicrobial airway bacterial communities in adult bronchiectasis patients.成人支气管扩张症患者的多微生物气道细菌群落
BMC Microbiol. 2014 May 20;14:130. doi: 10.1186/1471-2180-14-130.