Department of General Surgery John Radcliffe Hospital Oxford UK.
Cairns Library, John Radcliffe Hospital Oxford UK.
BJS Open. 2018 Nov 29;3(1):24-30. doi: 10.1002/bjs5.50118. eCollection 2019 Feb.
The use of peritoneal lavage to prevent postoperative intra-abdominal abscess (IAA) after appendicectomy has been debated widely.
A systematic review and meta-analysis of suction alone lavage for appendicitis was performed to determine the relative benefit of lavage. Primary outcomes were postoperative IAA and wound infection (WI). Inclusion criteria were human studies reporting a comparison of appendicectomy with or without peritoneal lavage.
Eight studies met the inclusion criteria, the majority of which were retrospective. Only three were RCTs. Four studies included analysis only of the paediatric population. The rate of IAA was 1·0-19·5 per cent in patients receiving suction alone and 1·5-18·6 per cent in those having lavage. WI rates were 1·0-29·2 per cent for suction alone and 0·8-20·5 per cent for lavage. The pooled risk difference for IAA was 0·01 (95 per cent c.i. -0·03 to 0·06; = 0·50) and that for WI was 0·00 (-0·05 to 0·05; = 0·98). Analyses of both outcomes indicated a medium degree of heterogeneity between effect estimates with values of 71 per cent ( = 0·001) and 70 per cent ( = 0·010) for IAA and WI respectively.
There is no evidence of benefit of lavage over suction for postoperative infective complications, and no individual study demonstrated a significant benefit in patients receiving lavage.
在阑尾切除术后使用腹腔灌洗以预防术后腹腔内脓肿(IAA)一直存在广泛争议。
我们对单独抽吸冲洗用于阑尾炎的研究进行了系统评价和荟萃分析,以确定冲洗的相对益处。主要结局是术后 IAA 和伤口感染(WI)。纳入标准是报告比较阑尾切除术加或不加腹腔灌洗的人类研究。
有 8 项研究符合纳入标准,其中大多数为回顾性研究。只有 3 项为 RCT。有 4 项研究仅分析了儿科人群。接受单纯抽吸的患者 IAA 发生率为 1.0-19.5%,接受灌洗的患者为 1.5-18.6%。WI 发生率分别为单纯抽吸的 1.0-29.2%和灌洗的 0.8-20.5%。IAA 的汇总风险差异为 0.01(95%可信区间-0.03 至 0.06; = 0.50),WI 的风险差异为 0.00(-0.05 至 0.05; = 0.98)。对这两种结局的分析均表明,效应估计之间存在中度异质性,IAA 和 WI 的 I²值分别为 71%( = 0.001)和 70%( = 0.010)。
没有证据表明灌洗优于单纯抽吸冲洗用于预防术后感染性并发症,而且没有任何一项研究表明接受灌洗的患者有明显获益。