• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
"It's not a food issue; it's an income issue": using Nutritious Food Basket costing for health equity advocacy.“这不是食物问题,而是收入问题”:使用营养食品篮成本进行健康公平宣传。
Can J Public Health. 2019 Jun;110(3):294-302. doi: 10.17269/s41997-019-00185-5. Epub 2019 Feb 7.
2
Influence of revised public health standards on health equity action: a qualitative study in Ontario, Canada.修订公共卫生标准对健康公平行动的影响:加拿大安大略省的一项定性研究。
Int J Equity Health. 2017 Oct 27;16(1):187. doi: 10.1186/s12939-017-0677-9.
3
Variability in public health programming and priorities to address health inequities across public health units in Ontario, Canada.加拿大安大略省各公共卫生单位在解决健康不平等问题的公共卫生规划和重点方面存在差异。
Can J Public Health. 2024 Oct;115(5):813-824. doi: 10.17269/s41997-024-00896-4. Epub 2024 Jun 6.
4
Assuming policy responsibility for health equity: local public health action in Ontario, Canada.承担健康公平的政策责任:加拿大安大略省的地方公共卫生行动
Health Promot Int. 2019 Apr 1;34(2):215-226. doi: 10.1093/heapro/dax073.
5
Using the QI Maturity Tool - Modified Ontario Version to assess the state of QI maturity in Ontario's public health units.使用质量改进成熟度工具 - 安大略省修订版来评估安大略省公共卫生单位的质量改进成熟度状况。
Arch Public Health. 2021 Oct 20;79(1):181. doi: 10.1186/s13690-021-00703-3.
6
Swimming against the tide: A Canadian qualitative study examining the implementation of a province-wide public health initiative to address health equity.逆水行舟:一项加拿大的定性研究,考察一项全省范围的旨在解决健康公平问题的公共卫生倡议的实施情况。
Int J Equity Health. 2016 Aug 19;15(1):129. doi: 10.1186/s12939-016-0419-4.
7
Chronic disease prevention evaluation in Ontario's public health system: a qualitative needs assessment.安大略省公共卫生系统中的慢性病预防评估:一项定性需求评估。
Can J Public Health. 2020 Dec;111(6):1002-1010. doi: 10.17269/s41997-020-00317-2. Epub 2020 Jun 5.
8
Understanding action on the social determinants of health: a critical realist analysis of in-depth interviews with staff of nine Ontario public health units.理解对健康社会决定因素的行动:对安大略省九个公共卫生单位工作人员的深入访谈的批判实在论分析
BMC Res Notes. 2015 Mar 28;8:105. doi: 10.1186/s13104-015-1064-5.
9
Is the minimum enough? Affordability of a nutritious diet for minimum wage earners in Nova Scotia (2002-2012).这个最低标准够吗?新斯科舍省最低工资劳动者的营养饮食可承受性(2002 - 2012年)。
Can J Public Health. 2014 May 9;105(3):e158-65. doi: 10.17269/cjph.105.4322.
10
One size doesn't fit all: methodological reflections in conducting community-based behavioural science research to tailor COVID-19 vaccination initiatives for public health priority populations.一刀切不适用:基于社区的行为科学研究方法的反思,以针对公共卫生重点人群调整 COVID-19 疫苗接种计划。
BMC Public Health. 2024 Mar 13;24(1):784. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-18270-x.

引用本文的文献

1
Learning well, living well: the causal effects of higher education on self-rated health and mental health in China.学得好,活得好:高等教育对中国自评健康和心理健康的因果效应
Front Public Health. 2025 Aug 11;13:1636194. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1636194. eCollection 2025.
2
Variability in public health programming and priorities to address health inequities across public health units in Ontario, Canada.加拿大安大略省各公共卫生单位在解决健康不平等问题的公共卫生规划和重点方面存在差异。
Can J Public Health. 2024 Oct;115(5):813-824. doi: 10.17269/s41997-024-00896-4. Epub 2024 Jun 6.
3
Observational study of population level disparities in food costs in 2021 in Canada: A digital national nutritious food basket (dNNFB).2021年加拿大食品成本的人群水平差异观察性研究:数字国家营养食品篮(dNNFB)
Prev Med Rep. 2023 Feb 23;32:102162. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2023.102162. eCollection 2023 Apr.
4
Public health matters-but we need to make the case.公共卫生至关重要——但我们需要阐明这一点。
Can J Public Health. 2019 Jun;110(3):264-269. doi: 10.17269/s41997-019-00218-z. Epub 2019 May 28.

本文引用的文献

1
The weakening of public health: A threat to population health and health care system sustainability.公共卫生的削弱:对人群健康和医疗保健系统可持续性的威胁。
Can J Public Health. 2017 Apr 20;108(1):e1-e6. doi: 10.17269/cjph.108.6143.
2
Swimming against the tide: A Canadian qualitative study examining the implementation of a province-wide public health initiative to address health equity.逆水行舟:一项加拿大的定性研究,考察一项全省范围的旨在解决健康公平问题的公共卫生倡议的实施情况。
Int J Equity Health. 2016 Aug 19;15(1):129. doi: 10.1186/s12939-016-0419-4.
3
Does public health advocacy seek to redress health inequities? A scoping review.公共卫生宣传是否旨在纠正健康不平等?一项范围综述。
Health Soc Care Community. 2017 Mar;25(2):309-328. doi: 10.1111/hsc.12320. Epub 2016 Jan 7.
4
Advocacy: It's not a dirty word, it's a duty.倡导:这不是个肮脏的字眼,而是一项职责。
Can J Public Health. 2015 Apr 10;106(3):e86-8. doi: 10.17269/cjph.106.5094.
5
Canadian public health under siege.加拿大公共卫生面临困境。
Can J Public Health. 2014 Dec 16;105(6):e401-3. doi: 10.17269/cjph.105.4960.
6
The untold story: examining Ontario's community health centres' initiatives to address upstream determinants of health.不为人知的故事:审视安大略省社区健康中心为解决健康的上游决定因素所采取的举措。
Healthc Policy. 2014;10(1):14-29.
7
Exploring health promotion practitioners' experiences of moral distress in Canada and Australia.探索加拿大和澳大利亚健康促进从业者的道德困境经历。
Glob Health Promot. 2015 Mar;22(1):32-45. doi: 10.1177/1757975914532505. Epub 2014 May 22.
8
Ideological and organizational components of differing public health strategies for addressing the social determinants of health.针对健康的社会决定因素的不同公共卫生策略的思想和组织组成部分。
Health Promot Int. 2015 Dec;30(4):855-67. doi: 10.1093/heapro/dau022. Epub 2014 Apr 16.
9
Beyond 'run, knit and relax': can health promotion in Canada advance the social determinants of health agenda?超越“跑步、编织和放松”:加拿大的健康促进能否推动健康问题的社会决定因素议程?
Healthc Policy. 2013 Oct;9(Spec Issue):48-58.
10
Affordability of a nutritious diet for income assistance recipients in Nova Scotia (2002-2010).新斯科舍省(2002-2010 年)收入援助接受者获得营养饮食的负担能力。
Can J Public Health. 2012 May-Jun;103(3):183-8. doi: 10.1007/BF03403810.

“这不是食物问题,而是收入问题”:使用营养食品篮成本进行健康公平宣传。

"It's not a food issue; it's an income issue": using Nutritious Food Basket costing for health equity advocacy.

机构信息

School of Kinesiology & Health Studies, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, K7L 3N6, Canada.

Department of Geography and Planning, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, K7L 3N6, Canada.

出版信息

Can J Public Health. 2019 Jun;110(3):294-302. doi: 10.17269/s41997-019-00185-5. Epub 2019 Feb 7.

DOI:10.17269/s41997-019-00185-5
PMID:30734246
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6964415/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Ontario's public health units (PHUs) face considerable challenges in addressing the social determinants of health, even though "reducing health inequities" is a primary population health outcome in the Ontario Public Health Standards (OPHS). Since 1998, the OPHS mandated PHUs to use the Nutritious Food Basket (NFB) protocol to document food costs, a requirement that was removed in 2018. This study examined how the NFB advanced health equity advocacy by Ontario PHUs, and why some have used this tool more strategically than others.

METHODS

Semi-structured qualitative phone interviews were conducted with 18 public health dietitians (PHDs) and three key informants between May and October 2017. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed, inductively coded, and analyzed.

RESULTS

The PHDs agreed that the NFB tool provides essential localized evidence of inadequate incomes for people living in poverty, and supports the health equity mandate of PHUs in Ontario. Factors that support NFB research and advocacy work include strong PHU leadership regarding health equity, participation in community coalitions, and engagement with Ontario Dietitians in Public Health (ODPH). Interviewees identified lack of support at the PHU level and lack of coordination of food insecurity work at the Ministry of Health as significant barriers to PHUs' use of the NFB to advance health equity mandates.

CONCLUSION

This study offers compelling evidence for reinstating NFB costing in the Ontario Public Health Standards as a mandatory requirement of PHUs. Without this requirement, the already-limited capacity of PHUs to advance health equity in Ontario will be further compromised.

摘要

目的

安大略省的公共卫生单位(PHU)在解决健康决定因素方面面临着巨大的挑战,尽管“减少健康不平等”是安大略省公共卫生标准(OPHS)中的主要人口健康结果。自 1998 年以来,OPHS 授权 PHU 使用营养食品篮(NFB)协议来记录食品成本,这一要求在 2018 年被取消。本研究考察了 NFB 如何促进安大略省 PHU 推进健康公平,以及为什么有些 PHU 比其他 PHU 更有策略地使用这个工具。

方法

2017 年 5 月至 10 月期间,对 18 名公共卫生营养师(PHD)和 3 名主要信息员进行了半结构式定性电话访谈。对访谈进行了录音、转录、归纳编码和分析。

结果

PHD 们一致认为,NFB 工具提供了有关生活在贫困中的人们收入不足的必要本地化证据,并支持安大略省 PHU 的健康公平任务。支持 NFB 研究和倡导工作的因素包括对健康公平的强大 PHU 领导、参与社区联盟以及与安大略省公共卫生营养师(ODPH)的合作。受访者确定了 PHU 层面缺乏支持以及卫生部在粮食不安全工作方面缺乏协调是 PHU 利用 NFB 推进健康公平任务的重大障碍。

结论

本研究为在安大略省公共卫生标准中恢复 NFB 成本核算作为 PHU 的强制性要求提供了令人信服的证据。如果没有这个要求,PHU 推进安大略省健康公平的能力已经有限,将进一步受到损害。