Graham David A, King Deirdre, Clegg Tracy A, O'Neill Ronan G
Animal Health Ireland, Carrick-on-Shannon, County Leitrim, Ireland (Graham, King).
Central Veterinary Research Laboratory, Centre for Veterinary Epidemiology and Risk Analysis, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland (Clegg).
J Vet Diagn Invest. 2019 Mar;31(2):284-288. doi: 10.1177/1040638719830457. Epub 2019 Feb 8.
We investigated the potential for viremic sera from cattle persistently infected with bovine viral diarrhea virus to create false-negative antibody results when testing pools of 10 sera by indirect or blocking ELISAs. Seronegative viremic sera ( n = 23) were each added to a series of artificially constructed pools containing various percentages (0-90%) of antibody-positive sera, and the resulting pools were assayed for antibody. In all 23 cases, a negative antibody result was obtained in the pool containing no seropositive sera. In contrast, all pools containing ≥10% seropositive serum, representing a single seropositive animal in a pool of 10 samples, returned a positive result in both antibody ELISAs. We concluded that the likelihood of a false-negative antibody result occurring as a result of the presence of serum from a viremic animal was low, and therefore did not preclude the use of pooled sera for serosurveillance.
我们研究了来自持续感染牛病毒性腹泻病毒的牛的病毒血症血清,在通过间接或阻断酶联免疫吸附测定法检测10份血清混合样本时产生假阴性抗体结果的可能性。将血清学阴性的病毒血症血清(n = 23)分别添加到一系列人工构建的混合样本中,这些混合样本含有不同百分比(0 - 90%)的抗体阳性血清,然后对所得混合样本进行抗体检测。在所有23个案例中,不含血清学阳性血清的混合样本获得了阴性抗体结果。相比之下,所有含有≥10%血清学阳性血清的混合样本(在10个样本的混合样本中代表一只血清学阳性动物)在两种抗体酶联免疫吸附测定中均返回阳性结果。我们得出结论,由于病毒血症动物血清的存在而出现假阴性抗体结果的可能性较低,因此并不排除使用混合血清进行血清学监测。