Suppr超能文献

预混胰岛素治疗的2型糖尿病患者糖化血红蛋白和平均血糖值的诊断准确性

Diagnostic Accuracy of Glycated Haemoglobin and Average Glucose Values in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Treated with Premixed Insulin.

作者信息

Walicka Magdalena, Jozwiak Jacek, Rzeszotarski Jacek, Zonenberg Anna, Masierek Malgorzata, Bijos Pawel, Franek Edward

机构信息

Department of Internal Diseases, Endocrinology and Diabetology, Central Clinical Hospital of the Ministry of the Inferior and Administration, Warsaw, Poland.

Department of Public Health, Czestochowa University of Technology, Czestochowa, Poland.

出版信息

Diabetes Ther. 2019 Apr;10(2):587-596. doi: 10.1007/s13300-019-0570-1. Epub 2019 Feb 8.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Studies assessing the relationship between glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) and average blood glucose (ABG) were conducted in small groups of patients on different treatments and may be biased for these reasons. The aim of the study was to assess the relationship between HbA1c and ABG in a large group of type 2 diabetes patients treated with premix insulin.

METHODS

In 4257 patients treated with premixed insulin, the parallel point-of-care assessment of HbA1c and ABG from the preceding 90 days (ABG90), calculated automatically from all values measured by the glucometer, was performed twice. The regression formulas and respective values of HbA1c and ABG90 were calculated.

RESULTS

The mean number of recorded glucose values/patient was 2.37 estimations per day. The regression formula calculated using data from the first assessment was HbA1c = 5.28 + 0.01487 × ABG90 and that using data from the second one was HbA1c = 4.78 + 0.01683 × ABG90. The slopes of the regression lines are lower than that in a similar analysis from the A1c-Derived Average Glucose (ADAG) study. The comparison of ADAG formula and the formula derived from the present study shows that both formulas give similar results at low HbA1c values, but differ at higher HbA1c values. Additionally, the 95% confidence interval is broader in the PROGENS study e.g. a 95% probability of certainty that the actual HbA1c value was greater than 7.0% (53 mmol/mol) was achieved only at an ABG90 value of 220 mg/dL.

CONCLUSION

The relationship between HbA1c and ABG estimations may be different in various patients; therefore, it seems that the use of one equation in all populations may not be reliable. Broad assessment of ABG as a tool that may replace HbA1c measurements should be recommended only with caution, providing the possible limitations and confidence intervals.

FUNDING

Bioton S.A.

摘要

引言

评估糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)与平均血糖(ABG)之间关系的研究是在接受不同治疗的小部分患者中进行的,可能因此存在偏差。本研究的目的是评估接受预混胰岛素治疗的一大群2型糖尿病患者中HbA1c与ABG之间的关系。

方法

在4257例接受预混胰岛素治疗的患者中,对糖化血红蛋白和前90天的平均血糖(ABG90)进行了两次即时平行评估,ABG90由血糖仪测量的所有值自动计算得出。计算了HbA1c和ABG90的回归公式及各自的值。

结果

每位患者记录的血糖值平均数量为每天2.37次测定。使用首次评估数据计算的回归公式为HbA1c = 5.28 + 0.01487×ABG90,使用第二次评估数据计算的回归公式为HbA1c = 4.78 + 0.01683×ABG90。回归线的斜率低于糖化血红蛋白衍生平均血糖(ADAG)研究中类似分析的斜率。ADAG公式与本研究得出的公式比较表明,两个公式在低HbA1c值时给出相似结果,但在高HbA1c值时有所不同。此外,在PROGENS研究中95%置信区间更宽,例如只有当ABG90值为220 mg/dL时,实际HbA1c值大于7.0%(53 mmol/mol)才有95%的确定概率。

结论

HbA1c与ABG评估之间的关系在不同患者中可能不同;因此,在所有人群中使用一个公式似乎不可靠。仅在谨慎提供可能的局限性和置信区间的情况下,才应推荐将ABG作为可能替代HbA1c测量的工具进行广泛评估。

资金来源

Bioton S.A.

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cd99/6437248/6cf120af2837/13300_2019_570_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验