Vogt Barbara, Hennig Victoria, Deuß Kathinka, Balke Lorenz, Weiler Norbert, Frerichs Inéz
Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Medical Center Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Kiel, Germany.
Department of Pneumology, University Medical Center Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Kiel, Germany.
Clin Respir J. 2019 Apr;13(4):239-246. doi: 10.1111/crj.13004. Epub 2019 Feb 21.
Pulmonary function is not routinely assessed in patients without respiratory disease and symptoms before surgery, even if they are smokers. We aimed to check whether the new spirometric reference values of the worldwide Global Lung Initiative (GLI) affected the preoperative assessment of lung function in allegedly lung-healthy patients compared with the still commonly used old predicted values.
Two hundred nineteen allegedly lung-healthy non-smokers, past and current smokers were examined by spirometry before elective surgery. The obtained values of forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV ), forced vital capacity (FVC) and FEV /FVC were transformed into z-scores according to the GLI guidelines. A comparison between the new and old reference values was performed. FEV was used for the grading of airway obstruction.
One hundred eighty-three subjects performed the ventilation manoeuvre according to the GLI recommendations and were analysed. Most non-smokers and past smokers met the new references ranges for spirometric values. Only z-scores of FEV /FVC distinguished among all three patient groups, FEV between smokers and the other two groups and FVC did not discriminate the groups, irrespective of the reference values used. Airway obstruction was identified in 24% of asymptomatic smokers by z-scores of FEV /FVC but in only 14% by the old predicted values. In elderly smokers (>60 years), the corresponding values rose to 50% and 30%. Old predicted values of FEV underestimated the degree of airway obstruction mainly in middle-aged smokers.
Allegedly lung-healthy current smokers showed a higher proportion of preoperatively reduced lung function when z-scores were used, especially in elderly subjects.
对于术前没有呼吸系统疾病和症状的患者,即使他们是吸烟者,通常也不会常规评估其肺功能。我们旨在检查全球肺部倡议组织(GLI)的新肺量计参考值与仍常用的旧预测值相比,是否会影响所谓肺部健康患者术前的肺功能评估。
对219名所谓肺部健康的非吸烟者、既往吸烟者和现吸烟者在择期手术前进行肺量计检查。根据GLI指南,将获得的1秒用力呼气量(FEV)、用力肺活量(FVC)和FEV/FVC值转换为z分数。对新旧参考值进行比较。FEV用于气道阻塞分级。
183名受试者按照GLI建议进行了通气操作并接受分析。大多数非吸烟者和既往吸烟者的肺量计值符合新的参考范围。无论使用何种参考值,只有FEV/FVC的z分数能区分所有三组患者,FEV能区分吸烟者与其他两组患者,而FVC不能区分这些组。通过FEV/FVC的z分数,24%无症状吸烟者被判定存在气道阻塞,但使用旧预测值时这一比例仅为14%。在老年吸烟者(>60岁)中,相应比例分别升至50%和30%。FEV的旧预测值主要低估了中年吸烟者的气道阻塞程度。
当使用z分数时,所谓肺部健康的现吸烟者术前肺功能降低的比例更高,尤其是在老年受试者中。