Sprott School of Business, Carleton University, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Smith School of Business, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada.
Stress Health. 2019 Aug;35(3):304-317. doi: 10.1002/smi.2858. Epub 2019 Apr 12.
Why leaders behave the way they do is of considerable importance. Our goal in this research was to understand how family-to-work conflict and romantic relationship conflict influence two different forms of destructive leadership, namely, abusive supervision and passive leadership. To do so, we invoke the conservation of resources theory. One hundred twenty-three leader-follower dyads participated. Leaders completed questionnaires on their own family-to-work conflict and romantic relationship conflict, depressive symptoms, and cognitive distraction. Their followers rated their abusive supervision and passive leadership. With the use of Hayes's PROCESS program, depressive symptoms mediated the effects of family-to-work conflict and romantic relationship conflict on abusive supervision, whereas cognitive distraction mediated the effects of family-to-work conflict on passive leadership. Implications and several directions for further research are offered.
领导者的行为方式为何如此重要。在这项研究中,我们的目标是了解家庭-工作冲突和浪漫关系冲突如何影响两种不同形式的破坏性领导,即辱骂式监管和被动领导。为此,我们援引了资源保存理论。123 对领导-下属二人组参与了研究。领导者自己填写了家庭-工作冲突和浪漫关系冲突、抑郁症状和认知分心的问卷。他们的下属则对他们的辱骂式监管和被动领导进行了评价。利用海斯的 PROCESS 程序,抑郁症状在家庭-工作冲突和浪漫关系冲突对辱骂式监管的影响中起到了中介作用,而认知分心则在家庭-工作冲突对被动领导的影响中起到了中介作用。我们提供了一些启示和进一步研究的方向。