a Department of Public Health , University of Naples "Federico II" , Naples , Italy.
Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2019;15(5):1035-1047. doi: 10.1080/21645515.2019.1578597. Epub 2019 Mar 25.
Seasonal influenza is a very common disease. Yearly vaccination of at-risk population groups is a well-recognized cost-effective/cost-saving preventive measure. It is, however, unclear which available alternative has the most favorable economic profile. Some available options are: trivalent (TIV) and quadrivalent (QIV) inactivated vaccines, adjuvanted TIV (aTIV). Because of immunosenescence, aTIV has been specifically developed for elderly. The present study aimed at assessing the available evidence of aTIV use in elderly from the economic perspective. A systematic literature review targeting aTIV economic evaluations in adults aged ≥65 years was performed using Medline via Ovid, Embase, DARE and NHS/EED. Of a total of 3,654 papers screened, 18 studies (13 full papers, 5 conference abstracts) were included. It emerged that compared with both non-vaccination or non-adjuvanted vaccines, aTIV was cost-effective or cost-saving. The vaccinations strategies incorporating aTIV based on age and/or risk profile are associated with the most favorable economic outcomes.
季节性流感是一种非常常见的疾病。对高危人群进行年度疫苗接种是一种公认的具有成本效益/成本节约的预防措施。然而,目前尚不清楚哪种可用的替代方案具有最有利的经济状况。一些可用的选择包括:三价(TIV)和四价(QIV)灭活疫苗、佐剂 TIV(aTIV)。由于免疫衰老,aTIV 是专门为老年人开发的。本研究旨在从经济角度评估老年人使用 aTIV 的现有证据。使用 Ovid 中的 Medline、Embase、DARE 和 NHS/EED 对≥65 岁成年人的 aTIV 经济学评估进行了系统的文献回顾。在总共筛选出的 3654 篇论文中,纳入了 18 项研究(13 篇全文,5 篇会议摘要)。结果表明,与不接种疫苗或不接种佐剂疫苗相比,aTIV 具有成本效益或成本节约。基于年龄和/或风险状况的包含 aTIV 的疫苗接种策略与最有利的经济结果相关。