Department of Chemistry and Physics, California University of Pennsylvania, California, PA, United States of America.
National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, National Personal Protective Technology Laboratory Pittsburgh, PA, United States of America.
PLoS One. 2019 Feb 8;14(2):e0211827. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0211827. eCollection 2019.
Protective clothing manufacturers routinely test their products for resistance to liquid and viral penetration. Several of the test methods specified by the American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) and the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) for penetration testing produce binary results (i.e. pass or fail), deliver imprecise pressure regulation, and do not record the location at which penetration events occur. Instead, our approach measures a continuous variable (time of penetration) during a slow and continuous increase of hydrostatic pressure and retains the location of penetration events. Using a fluorescent dye to enhance visual detection, we evaluate temporal and spatial patterns of penetration events. We then compare the time of liquid penetration with the time of penetration of two bacteriophages (Phi-X174 and MS2). For the fabric tested, the mean viral penetration occurred 0.29 minutes earlier than liquid penetration when solved by logistic regression. The breakthrough time of MS2 was not different from the Phi-X174 bacteriophage. The time of liquid penetration was a latent indicator of the time of viral penetration.
防护服制造商通常会对其产品的耐液体和病毒穿透性进行测试。美国测试材料协会(ASTM)和国际标准化组织(ISO)规定的几种穿透性测试方法产生的结果是二值的(即通过或失败),压力调节不精确,并且不记录穿透事件发生的位置。相反,我们的方法在静水压力缓慢而连续增加的过程中测量一个连续变量(穿透时间),并保留穿透事件的位置。我们使用荧光染料来增强视觉检测,评估穿透事件的时间和空间模式。然后,我们将液体穿透时间与两种噬菌体(Phi-X174 和 MS2)的穿透时间进行比较。对于测试的织物,通过逻辑回归求解时,液体穿透的平均病毒穿透时间早于液体穿透时间 0.29 分钟。MS2 的突破时间与 Phi-X174 噬菌体没有区别。液体穿透时间是病毒穿透时间的潜在指标。