• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Practical and Ethical Considerations of Using Personal DNA Tests with Middle-School-Aged Learners.将个人 DNA 测试用于中学年龄段学习者的实际和伦理考虑。
Am J Hum Genet. 2019 Feb 7;104(2):197-202. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2019.01.001.
2
Anticipation of Personal Genomics Data Enhances Interest and Learning Environment in Genomics and Molecular Biology Undergraduate Courses.对个人基因组数据的预期提升了基因组学和分子生物学本科课程中的兴趣和学习环境。
PLoS One. 2015 Aug 4;10(8):e0133486. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0133486. eCollection 2015.
3
Evidence that personal genome testing enhances student learning in a course on genomics and personalized medicine.个人基因组检测增强了一门关于基因组学和个性化医学课程的学生学习效果的证据。
PLoS One. 2013 Jul 23;8(7):e68853. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0068853. Print 2013.
4
Integrating genomics into clinical oncology: ethical and social challenges from proponents of personalized medicine.将基因组学整合到临床肿瘤学中:个性化医疗支持者面临的伦理和社会挑战。
Urol Oncol. 2014 Feb;32(2):187-92. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2013.10.009.
5
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
6
Perception of personalized medicine, pharmacogenomics, and genetic testing among undergraduates in Hong Kong.香港本科生对个性化医学、药物基因组学和基因检测的认知。
Hum Genomics. 2021 Aug 18;15(1):54. doi: 10.1186/s40246-021-00353-0.
7
Playing a part in research? University students' attitudes to direct-to-consumer genomics.参与研究?大学生对直接面向消费者的基因组学的态度。
Public Health Genomics. 2014;17(3):158-68. doi: 10.1159/000360257. Epub 2014 Apr 25.
8
Consent to 'personal' genomics and privacy. Direct-to-consumer genetic tests and population genome research challenge traditional notions of privacy and consent.同意“个人”基因组学和隐私。直接面向消费者的基因检测和人群基因组研究挑战了传统的隐私和同意观念。
EMBO Rep. 2010 Jun;11(6):416-9. doi: 10.1038/embor.2010.69. Epub 2010 May 7.
9
Lessons learned from the introduction of personalized genotyping into a medical school curriculum.从将个性化基因分型引入医学院课程中所吸取的经验教训。
Genet Med. 2011 Jan;13(1):63-6. doi: 10.1097/GIM.0b013e3181f872ac.
10
Out-of-school settings as a developmental context for children and youth.校外环境作为儿童和青少年的发展背景。
Adv Child Dev Behav. 2005;33:43-77. doi: 10.1016/s0065-2407(05)80004-7.

引用本文的文献

1
Guidelines for genetic ancestry inference created through roundtable discussions.通过圆桌讨论制定的遗传祖先推断指南。
HGG Adv. 2023 Jan 13;4(2):100178. doi: 10.1016/j.xhgg.2023.100178. eCollection 2023 Apr 13.
2
Skin color and race.肤色和种族。
Am J Phys Anthropol. 2021 Jun;175(2):437-447. doi: 10.1002/ajpa.24200. Epub 2020 Dec 29.

本文引用的文献

1
The Social Life of DNA: Race, Reparations, and Reconciliation After the Genome Beacon Press, 2016. 216 pp.《DNA的社会生活:基因组时代后的种族、赔偿与和解》 灯塔出版社,2016年。216页。
Science. 2021 Sep 24;373(6562):1449. doi: 10.1126/science.abm1869. Epub 2021 Sep 23.
2
Genomics is failing on diversity.基因组学在多样性方面表现不佳。
Nature. 2016 Oct 13;538(7624):161-164. doi: 10.1038/538161a.
3
Sociology. Weaving a richer tapestry in biomedical science.社会学。为生物医学科学编织一幅更为丰富多彩的画卷。
Science. 2011 Aug 19;333(6045):940-1. doi: 10.1126/science.1211704.
4
Inferring genetic ancestry: opportunities, challenges, and implications.推断遗传血统:机遇、挑战和影响。
Am J Hum Genet. 2010 May 14;86(5):661-73. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2010.03.011.
5
Bio science: genetic genealogy testing and the pursuit of African ancestry.生物科学:基因族谱检测与对非洲血统的追寻。
Soc Stud Sci. 2008 Oct;38(5):759-83. doi: 10.1177/0306312708091929.

将个人 DNA 测试用于中学年龄段学习者的实际和伦理考虑。

Practical and Ethical Considerations of Using Personal DNA Tests with Middle-School-Aged Learners.

机构信息

Anthropology Department, The Pennsylvania State University, State College, PA 16802, USA.

Center for Translational Bioethics and Health Care Policy, Geisinger, Danville, PA 17822, USA.

出版信息

Am J Hum Genet. 2019 Feb 7;104(2):197-202. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2019.01.001.

DOI:10.1016/j.ajhg.2019.01.001
PMID:30735660
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6372260/
Abstract

Personalized genetic information is not widely utilized as a resource in learning environments, in part because of concerns about data privacy and the treatment of sensitive personal information. Here we describe the implementation of a curriculum centered on analyzing personalized genetic-ancestry test results during two-week science summer camps for middle-school-aged youth. Our research focused on how the examination of personalized DNA results affected learners' subsequent perceptions and performance, as measured by in-camp pre- and post-tests and surveys, analysis of voluntary student talk captured by audio and video recordings, and periodic one-on-one post-camp follow-ups. The curriculum was grounded in Next Generation Science Standards (NGSS) and focused around the central question of "Who am I?" Campers approached this question via guided lessons designed to shed light on their genetic uniqueness, the many attributes of their genotype and phenotype shared with others, their more distant genetic and evolutionary ancestries, and their roles as active agents in the healthy continuation of their lives. Data relevant to these questions came from edited subsets of ancestry-informative single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) and phenotype-related SNPs from the campers' genotype results, which their parents had received from a direct-to-consumer vendor. Our approaches to data privacy and the discovery, disclosure, and discussion of sensitive information on paternity, carrier status, and ancestry can be usefully applied and modified for many educational contexts. On the basis of our pilot implementations, we recommend additional and expanded research on how to incorporate personalized genetic ancestry information in a variety of learning contexts.

摘要

个性化基因信息尚未广泛应用于学习环境,部分原因是对数据隐私和敏感个人信息处理的担忧。在这里,我们描述了在面向中学生的为期两周的暑期科学营中,分析个性化基因血统测试结果的课程实施情况。我们的研究重点是,通过营地内的前后测和调查、音频和视频记录中捕捉到的学生自愿谈话的分析,以及定期的营地后一对一跟进,来考察对个性化 DNA 结果的分析如何影响学习者的后续认知和表现。该课程以下一代科学标准(NGSS)为基础,围绕“我是谁?”这一核心问题展开。营员们通过有指导的课程来探讨这个问题,这些课程旨在揭示他们的基因独特性、与他人共享的许多基因型和表型特征、更远的遗传和进化祖先,以及他们作为积极参与自身健康延续的角色。与这些问题相关的数据来自营员基因型结果中经过编辑的、具有血统信息的单核苷酸多态性(SNP)子集,以及与表型相关的 SNP,这些数据来自他们的父母从直接面向消费者的供应商那里获得的结果。我们在数据隐私方面的方法,以及发现、披露和讨论亲子关系、携带者状态和祖先等敏感信息的方法,可以在许多教育环境中得到有效应用和修改。基于我们的试点实施情况,我们建议进一步扩大研究,探讨如何在各种学习环境中纳入个性化的基因遗传信息。