Suppr超能文献

使用锥形闪烁体屏幕探测器进行质子铅笔束扫描治疗的半自动 IGRT QA。

Semi-automated IGRT QA using a cone-shaped scintillator screen detector for proton pencil beam scanning treatments.

机构信息

Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 500 Westchester Avenue, West Harrison, NY 10604, United States of America. Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, 55 Fruit Street, Boston, MA 02114, United States of America. Department of Radiation Oncology, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, 75 Francis Street, Boston, MA 02115, United States of America. These authors have contributed equally to this paper.

出版信息

Phys Med Biol. 2019 Apr 5;64(8):085004. doi: 10.1088/1361-6560/ab056d.

Abstract

To promote accurate image-guided radiotherapy (IGRT) for a proton pencil beam scanning (PBS) system, a new quality assurance (QA) procedure employing a cone-shaped scintillator detector has been developed for multiple QA tasks in a semi-automatic manner. The cone-shaped scintillator detector (XRV-124, Logos Systems, CA) is sensitive to both x-ray and proton beams. It records scintillation on the cone surface as a 2D image, from which the geometry of the radiation field that enters and exits the cone can be extracted. Utilizing this feature, QA parameters that are essential to PBS IGRT treatment were measured and analyzed. The first applications provided coincidence checks of laser, imaging and radiation isocenters, and dependencies on gantry angle and beam energies. The analysis of the Winston-Lutz test was made available by combining the centricity measurements of the x-ray beam and the pencil beam. The accuracy of the gantry angle was validated against console readings provided by the digital encoder and an agreement of less than 0.2° was found. The accuracy of the position measurement was assessed with a robotic patient positioning system (PPS) and an agreement of less than 0.5 mm was obtained. The centricity of the two onboard x-ray imaging systems agreed well with that from the routinely used Digital Imaging Positioning System (DIPS), up to a consistent small shift of (-0.5 mm, 0.0 mm, -0.3 mm). The pencil beam spot size, in terms of σ of Gaussian fitting, agreed within 0.2 mm for most energies when compared to the conventional measurements by a 2D ion-chamber array (MatriXX-PT, IBA Dosimetry, Belgium). The cone-shaped scintillator system showed advantages in making multi-purpose measurements with a single setup. The in-house algorithms were successfully implemented to measure and analyze key QA parameters in a semi-automatic manner. This study presents an alternative and more efficient approach for IGRT QA for PBS and potentially for linear accelerators.

摘要

为了促进质子笔形扫描(PBS)系统的精确图像引导放射治疗(IGRT),我们开发了一种新的质量保证(QA)程序,该程序使用锥形闪烁探测器以半自动方式进行多项 QA 任务。锥形闪烁探测器(XRV-124,Logos Systems,CA)对 X 射线和质子束均敏感。它记录进入和离开圆锥体的辐射场的几何形状,从而在圆锥体表面上记录闪烁。利用此功能,测量和分析了 PBS IGRT 治疗必不可少的 QA 参数。首次应用提供了激光,成像和辐射等中心的符合检查,并依赖于龙门架角度和射束能量。通过结合 X 射线束和铅笔束的同心度测量,可以进行 Winston-Lutz 测试的分析。与数字编码器提供的控制台读数相比,验证了龙门架角度的准确性,发现两者相差小于 0.2°。使用机器人患者定位系统(PPS)评估了位置测量的准确性,得到的结果相差小于 0.5 mm。两个机载 X 射线成像系统的同心度与常规使用的数字成像定位系统(DIPS)吻合良好,一致的小偏移为(-0.5 mm,0.0 mm,-0.3 mm)。与传统的二维离子室阵列(MatriXX-PT,IBA 剂量学,比利时)相比,大多数能量下的铅笔束光斑尺寸(高斯拟合的 σ)的测量结果相差在 0.2 mm 以内。锥形闪烁体系统在单次设置下进行多种用途的测量具有优势。成功实施了内部算法以半自动方式测量和分析关键 QA 参数。这项研究为 PBS 和潜在的线性加速器的 IGRT QA 提供了一种替代且更有效的方法。

相似文献

4
Applications of various range shifters for proton pencil beam scanning radiotherapy.
Radiat Oncol. 2021 Aug 6;16(1):146. doi: 10.1186/s13014-021-01873-8.
7
Characterization of a commercial scintillation detector for 2-D dosimetry in scanned proton and carbon ion beams.
Phys Med. 2017 Feb;34:48-54. doi: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2017.01.011. Epub 2017 Jan 22.
8
Daily QA in proton therapy using a single commercially available detector.
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2014 Nov 8;15(6):5005. doi: 10.1120/jacmp.v15i6.5005.
10
End-to-end test to evaluate the comprehensive geometric accuracy of a proton rotating gantry using a cone-shaped scintillator screen detector.
Radiol Phys Technol. 2020 Jun;13(2):144-151. doi: 10.1007/s12194-020-00562-7. Epub 2020 Mar 14.

引用本文的文献

1
Utilizing collimated aperture with proton pencil beam scanning (PBS) for stereotactic radiotherapy.
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2024 Jul;25(7):e14362. doi: 10.1002/acm2.14362. Epub 2024 Apr 26.
2
Feasibility Study of Using XRV-124 Scintillation Detector for Collinearity Measurement in Uniform Scanning Proton Therapy.
Int J Part Ther. 2022 Apr 22;9(1):90-95. doi: 10.14338/IJPT-21-00040.1. eCollection 2022 Summer.
3
Investigating the potential of conical scintillation detectors for patient-specific verification of intensity-modulated radiotherapy plans.
Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol. 2020 Jun 11;14:67-73. doi: 10.1016/j.phro.2020.06.001. eCollection 2020 Apr.

本文引用的文献

1
Impacts of gantry angle dependent scanning beam properties on proton PBS treatment.
Phys Med Biol. 2017 Jan 21;62(2):344-357. doi: 10.1088/1361-6560/aa5084. Epub 2016 Dec 20.
2
First Clinical Investigation of Cone Beam Computed Tomography and Deformable Registration for Adaptive Proton Therapy for Lung Cancer.
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2016 May 1;95(1):549-559. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2016.01.055. Epub 2016 Feb 4.
4
Quality assurance of proton beams using a multilayer ionization chamber system.
Med Phys. 2013 Sep;40(9):092102. doi: 10.1118/1.4817481.
5
Imaging system QA of a medical accelerator, Novalis Tx, for IGRT per TG 142: our 1 year experience.
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2012 Jul 5;13(4):3754. doi: 10.1120/jacmp.v13i4.3754.
7
An end-to-end examination of geometric accuracy of IGRT using a new digital accelerator equipped with onboard imaging system.
Phys Med Biol. 2012 Feb 7;57(3):757-69. doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/57/3/757. Epub 2012 Jan 18.
8
Image-guided radiotherapy: has it influenced patient outcomes?
Semin Radiat Oncol. 2012 Jan;22(1):50-61. doi: 10.1016/j.semradonc.2011.09.001.
9
Feasibility study of performing IGRT system daily QA using a commercial QA device.
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2011 Jun 1;12(3):3535. doi: 10.1120/jacmp.v12i3.3535.
10
Successful implementation of image-guided radiation therapy quality assurance in the Trans Tasman Radiation Oncology Group 08.01 PROFIT Study.
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2011 Dec 1;81(5):1576-81. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2010.09.017. Epub 2010 Nov 11.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验