Suppr超能文献

螺纹形状是否会影响用于前交叉韧带重建的生物可吸收干涉螺钉的固定强度?一项生物力学研究。

Does thread shape affect the fixation strength of the bioabsorbable interference screws for anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions? A biomechanical study.

作者信息

Garcés Gerardo L, Martel Oscar, Yánez Alejandro, Cuadrado Alberto

机构信息

Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Edificio de Ciencias de la Salud, Campus Universitario de San Cristobal, Trasera del Hospital InsularC/ Doctor Pasteur s/n, 35016, Las Palmas, Spain.

Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Edificio de Ingenierías, Campus de Tafira, 35017, Las Palmas, Spain.

出版信息

BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2019 Feb 8;20(1):60. doi: 10.1186/s12891-019-2435-1.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to compare the biomechanical behaviour of two bioabsorbable interference screws with different geometries.

METHODS

Two different pitch (2.5 and 5 mm) bioabsorbable interference screws, both 9 × 30 mm, were tested. Tests were performed with forty bovine digital extensor tendons and skeletally mature porcine tibiae. Two protocols of cyclic tests at 1 Hz were performed: 1000 cycles from 50 to 250 N, and 5000 cycles from 100 to 300 N (n = 10 for each type of test and screw). After the cyclic loading, a final ramp displacement until failure at 0.5 mm/s was applied.

RESULTS

The stiffness after the cyclic phase of the tests was not statistically different between the two screws (1000th cycle: 2.5 mm pitch 280.3 ± 56.4 N/mm, 5 mm pitch 275.2 ± 65.0 N/mm, P = .965; 5000th cycle: 2.5 mm pitch 281.3 ± 66.4 N/mm, 5 mm pitch 286.1 ± 79.4 N/mm, P = .814). The yield load was not significantly different between the screws (1000 cycle tests: 2.5 mm pitch 482.2 ± 120.2 N, 5 mm pitch 495.9 ± 131.3 N, P = .508; 5000 cycle tests: 2.5 mm pitch 476.4 ± 65.3 N, 5 mm pitch 494.3 ± 39.2 N, P = .391). No correlation was found between the insertion torque and yield load (1000 cycle tests, R = 0.013; 5000 cycle tests, R = 0.006).

CONCLUSIONS

The pitch of bioabsorbable interference screws does not seem to affect fixation strength. Also, the authors recommend not to use insertion torque alone to estimate the fixation strength.

摘要

背景

本研究的目的是比较两种不同几何形状的可吸收加压螺钉的生物力学行为。

方法

测试了两种不同螺距(2.5和5毫米)的9×30毫米可吸收加压螺钉。对40条牛趾背伸肌腱和骨骼成熟的猪胫骨进行测试。进行了两种1赫兹的循环测试方案:从50至250牛进行1000次循环,以及从100至300牛进行5000次循环(每种测试类型和螺钉各n = 10)。循环加载后,以0.5毫米/秒的速度施加最终斜坡位移直至失效。

结果

两种螺钉在测试循环阶段后的刚度无统计学差异(第1000次循环:2.5毫米螺距280.3±56.4牛/毫米,5毫米螺距275.2±65.0牛/毫米,P = 0.965;第5000次循环:2.5毫米螺距281.3±66.4牛/毫米,5毫米螺距286.1±79.4牛/毫米,P = 0.814)。螺钉之间的屈服载荷无显著差异(1000次循环测试:2.5毫米螺距482.2±120.2牛,5毫米螺距495.9±131.3牛,P = 0.508;5000次循环测试:2.5毫米螺距476.4±65.3牛,5毫米螺距494.3±39.2牛,P = 0.391)。未发现插入扭矩与屈服载荷之间存在相关性(1000次循环测试,R = 0.013;5000次循环测试,R = 0.006)。

结论

可吸收加压螺钉的螺距似乎不影响固定强度。此外,作者建议不要仅使用插入扭矩来估计固定强度。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7187/6368747/0d94816bf918/12891_2019_2435_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验