Suppr超能文献

疑似感染患者就诊于急诊科时疾病进展的早期识别:一项多中心推导和验证研究。

The early identification of disease progression in patients with suspected infection presenting to the emergency department: a multi-centre derivation and validation study.

机构信息

Department of Microbiology, Hampshire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Winchester and Basingstoke, UK.

University of Southampton, School of Medicine, Southampton, UK.

出版信息

Crit Care. 2019 Feb 8;23(1):40. doi: 10.1186/s13054-019-2329-5.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

There is a lack of validated tools to assess potential disease progression and hospitalisation decisions in patients presenting to the emergency department (ED) with a suspected infection. This study aimed to identify suitable blood biomarkers (MR-proADM, PCT, lactate and CRP) or clinical scores (SIRS, SOFA, qSOFA, NEWS and CRB-65) to fulfil this unmet clinical need.

METHODS

An observational derivation patient cohort validated by an independent secondary analysis across nine EDs. Logistic and Cox regression, area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) and Kaplan-Meier curves were used to assess performance. Disease progression was identified using a composite endpoint of 28-day mortality, ICU admission and hospitalisation > 10 days.

RESULTS

One thousand one hundred seventy-five derivation and 896 validation patients were analysed with respective 28-day mortality rates of 7.1% and 5.0%, and hospitalisation rates of 77.9% and 76.2%. MR-proADM showed greatest accuracy in predicting 28-day mortality and hospitalisation requirement across both cohorts. Patient subgroups with high MR-proADM concentrations (≥ 1.54 nmol/L) and low biomarker (PCT < 0.25 ng/mL, lactate < 2.0 mmol/L or CRP < 67 mg/L) or clinical score (SOFA < 2 points, qSOFA < 2 points, NEWS < 4 points or CRB-65 < 2 points) values were characterised by a significantly longer length of hospitalisation (p < 0.001), rate of ICU admission (p < 0.001), elevated mortality risk (e.g. SOFA, qSOFA and NEWS HR [95%CI], 45.5 [10.0-207.6], 23.4 [11.1-49.3] and 32.6 [9.4-113.6], respectively) and a greater number of disease progression events (p < 0.001), compared to similar subgroups with low MR-proADM concentrations (< 1.54 nmol/L). Increased out-patient treatment across both cohorts could be facilitated using a derivation-derived MR-proADM cut-off of < 0.87 nmol/L (15.0% and 16.6%), with decreased readmission rates and no mortalities.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients presenting to the ED with a suspected infection, the blood biomarker MR-proADM could most accurately identify the likelihood of further disease progression. Incorporation into an early sepsis management protocol may therefore aid rapid decision-making in order to either initiate, escalate or intensify early treatment strategies, or identify patients suitable for safe out-patient treatment.

摘要

背景

目前缺乏经过验证的工具来评估因疑似感染而到急诊科就诊的患者的潜在疾病进展和住院决策。本研究旨在确定合适的血液生物标志物(MR-proADM、PCT、乳酸和 CRP)或临床评分(SIRS、SOFA、qSOFA、NEWS 和 CRB-65)来满足这一临床需求。

方法

通过在 9 家急诊科进行独立的二次分析,对观察性推导患者队列进行验证。使用逻辑和 Cox 回归、受试者工作特征曲线下面积(AUROC)和 Kaplan-Meier 曲线来评估性能。疾病进展通过 28 天死亡率、入住 ICU 和住院时间>10 天的复合终点来识别。

结果

对 1175 例推导患者和 896 例验证患者进行了分析,相应的 28 天死亡率分别为 7.1%和 5.0%,住院率分别为 77.9%和 76.2%。MR-proADM 在两个队列中均显示出预测 28 天死亡率和住院需求的最佳准确性。MR-proADM 浓度较高(≥1.54nmol/L)和生物标志物(PCT<0.25ng/mL、乳酸<2.0mmol/L 或 CRP<67mg/L)或临床评分(SOFA<2 分、qSOFA<2 分、NEWS<4 分或 CRB-65<2 分)值较低的患者亚组具有更长的住院时间(p<0.001)、入住 ICU 的比率(p<0.001)、更高的死亡率风险(例如 SOFA、qSOFA 和 NEWS HR[95%CI],45.5[10.0-207.6]、23.4[11.1-49.3]和 32.6[9.4-113.6])和更多的疾病进展事件(p<0.001),与 MR-proADM 浓度较低的相似亚组(<1.54nmol/L)相比。通过推导得出的 MR-proADM 截断值<0.87nmol/L(15.0%和 16.6%)可以在两个队列中促进更多的门诊治疗,从而降低再入院率且无死亡。

结论

在因疑似感染而到急诊科就诊的患者中,血液生物标志物 MR-proADM 可以最准确地识别疾病进一步进展的可能性。因此,将其纳入早期脓毒症管理方案可能有助于快速决策,以便启动、升级或强化早期治疗策略,或识别适合安全门诊治疗的患者。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验