Department of Clinical Science, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway.
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2019 Jul;98(7):894-904. doi: 10.1111/aogs.13565. Epub 2019 Mar 25.
In most pregnancies after a cesarean section, a trial of labor is an option. The objective of the study was to explore trial of labor and its failure in pregnancies with medical risk conditions, in a population with a high trial of labor rate.
In a cohort study (n = 57 109), using data from the Medical Birth Registry of Norway 1989-2014, women with a second delivery after a first pregnancy cesarean section were included. Preterm, multiple, and non-cephalic deliveries were excluded. The outcomes were trial of labor and failed trial of labor, assessed as rates and relative risk, using deliveries without risk conditions as reference. Temporal trends were assessed by 3-year periods. The exposures were selected medical risk conditions, ie previous offspring death, labor dystocia, diabetes, heart conditions, chronic hypertension, chronic kidney disease, rheumatoid arthritis, thyroid disease, asthma, prepregnancy psychiatric conditions, epilepsy, obesity, gestational diabetes, eclampsia and preeclampsia, gestational hypertension, major malformations, second-pregnancy psychiatric conditions, assisted reproduction, macrosomia, and small-for-gestational-age neonates. Induced onset of labor was compared with spontaneous onset of labor for each condition studied.
In risk pregnancies (n = 31 994) the trial of labor rate was 64.9% and failure rate was 27.6%, compared with 74.6% and 16.4% in pregnancies without any of the risk conditions studied (n = 25 115). The lowest trial of labor rates were observed in diabetes type 1 (49.5%), diabetes type 2 (46.7%), maternal heart conditions (54.5%), and pregnancy-related psychiatric conditions (19.7%). The highest failure rates were observed in diabetes type 1 (43.1%), diabetes type 2 (40.3%), maternal obesity (36.9%), gestational diabetes (36.0%), and offspring macrosomia (43.0%). Induced labor was associated with failed trial of labor (P < .05), whereas after spontaneous labor, failure rates were less than 40% in all conditions studied.
In conditions with high rates of failed trial of labor, eg diabetes, macrosomia, and obesity, a planned cesarean section might be a better option than a trial of labor, particularly if induction of delivery might be needed.
在大多数剖宫产术后妊娠中,试产是一种选择。本研究的目的是在试产率较高的人群中,探讨有医学风险的妊娠中试产及其失败的情况。
在一项队列研究(n=57109)中,我们使用了 1989 年至 2014 年挪威医学出生登记处的数据,纳入了首次剖宫产术后再次分娩的女性。排除了早产、多胎和非头位分娩。以无风险条件的分娩为参照,评估试产和试产失败的结局,分别以发生率和相对风险表示。通过 3 年的时间段评估时间趋势。暴露因素为选择的医学风险因素,即既往胎儿死亡、产程延长、糖尿病、心脏疾病、慢性高血压、慢性肾脏病、类风湿关节炎、甲状腺疾病、哮喘、孕前精神疾病、癫痫、肥胖、妊娠期糖尿病、子痫和子痫前期、妊娠期高血压、严重畸形、二胎精神疾病、辅助生殖、巨大儿和胎儿小于胎龄。对于每一种研究的情况,我们比较了诱导分娩与自发分娩。
在有风险的妊娠(n=31994)中,试产率为 64.9%,失败率为 27.6%,而在无任何研究风险因素的妊娠(n=25115)中,试产率为 74.6%,失败率为 16.4%。1 型糖尿病(49.5%)、2 型糖尿病(46.7%)、母体心脏疾病(54.5%)和妊娠相关精神疾病(19.7%)的试产率最低。1 型糖尿病(43.1%)、2 型糖尿病(40.3%)、母体肥胖(36.9%)、妊娠期糖尿病(36.0%)和胎儿巨大儿(43.0%)的失败率最高。引产与试产失败相关(P<.05),而自发分娩后,所有研究条件的失败率均低于 40%。
在试产失败率较高的情况下,如糖尿病、巨大儿和肥胖,计划剖宫产可能是比试产更好的选择,特别是如果需要引产的话。