Mammary Pathology Unit of "Consorci Sanitari del Garraf" and the "Consorci Sanitari de l'Alt Penedès", Ronda Sant Camil s/n, 00810, San Pere de Ribes, Barcelona, Spain.
Cardiovascular Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, 1470 Madison Avenue, 10029, New York city, USA.
Int J Surg. 2019 Mar;63:98-106. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2019.01.016. Epub 2019 Feb 6.
Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS)-associated invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC) is present in a large number of patients with breast cancer. However, the association between these two entities has not been studied in detail. The aim of this study is to compare the clinical and histopathological factors associated to recurrence of IDC with those of DCIS-associated IDC (IDC + DCIS).
A prospective observational longitudinal study of 464 patients was performed between 2010 and 2015. Patients with IDC and DCIS + IDC were included and analyzed.
IDC + DCIS was present in 243 patients (52.4%). No difference on histopathological characteristics were found, only Grade I and II of invasive component were more frequent in patients with IDC + DCIS than those with IDC (p = 0.038). No differences on recurrence were found between the main groups (p = 0.256). For patients who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy, those with IDC + DCIS had lower response than those with IDC alone (p = 0.014). No differences between the main groups were found on recurrence (p = 0.256). For patients who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy, recurrence was present in 19 patients (30.6%) in the IDC group in contrast to 5 (12.2%) in the IDC + DCIS group (p = 0.030). Mortality was present in 15 patients (24.2%) in the IDC group in contrast to 3 (7.3%) in the IDC + DCIS group (p = 0.027). At 7 years, 80.8% patients were alive: 71.9% from the IDC group and 92.7% from the IDC + DCIS group.
The presence of DCIS seems to be indicative of a benign behavior in patients who receive neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Longer DFS and higher overall survival were found in the IDC + DCIS group despite presenting with a lower response to chemotherapy. These findings help us identify patients with better prognosis in breast cancer.
导管原位癌(DCIS)相关浸润性导管癌(IDC)存在于大量乳腺癌患者中。然而,这两种实体之间的关联尚未得到详细研究。本研究旨在比较与 IDC 相关的 DCIS(IDC+DCIS)的复发相关的临床和组织病理学因素。
对 2010 年至 2015 年间的 464 例患者进行了前瞻性观察性纵向研究。纳入并分析了 IDC 和 IDC+DCIS 患者。
243 例患者(52.4%)存在 IDC+DCIS。在组织病理学特征方面没有差异,仅浸润性成分的 I 级和 II 级在 IDC+DCIS 患者中比 IDC 患者更为常见(p=0.038)。主要组之间未发现复发差异(p=0.256)。对于接受新辅助化疗的患者,IDC+DCIS 患者的反应低于单独 IDC 患者(p=0.014)。主要组之间在复发方面无差异(p=0.256)。对于接受新辅助化疗的患者,IDC 组中有 19 例(30.6%)出现复发,而 IDC+DCIS 组中有 5 例(12.2%)出现复发(p=0.030)。IDC 组中有 15 例(24.2%)患者死亡,而 IDC+DCIS 组中有 3 例(7.3%)患者死亡(p=0.027)。在 7 年时,80.8%的患者存活:IDC 组为 71.9%,IDC+DCIS 组为 92.7%。
在接受新辅助化疗的患者中,DCIS 的存在似乎表明其行为良性。尽管对化疗的反应较低,但 IDC+DCIS 组的无病生存期(DFS)更长,总生存期(OS)更高。这些发现有助于我们确定乳腺癌中预后较好的患者。