• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

胃旁路术后Oddi 括约肌功能障碍:手术还是内镜治疗?

Sphincter of Oddi Dysfunction After Gastric Bypass: Surgical or Endoscopic Therapy?

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana.

Department of Gastroenterology, Advanced Endoscopy, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana.

出版信息

J Surg Res. 2019 Jun;238:41-47. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2019.01.013. Epub 2019 Feb 6.

DOI:10.1016/j.jss.2019.01.013
PMID:30738357
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Management of Sphincter of Oddi Dysfunction (SOD) requires advanced techniques (endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography via gastrostomy [GERCP]) after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) for obesity. Transduodenal sphincteroplasty (TS) is also performed yet carries the risks of surgery. We hypothesized that TS would have increased morbidity and mortality but provide a more durable remission of symptoms.

METHODS

All patients between 2005 and 2016 with RYGB for obesity undergoing endoscopic or surgical management for type I or II SOD were included in the study. Patients with type III SOD, or who underwent RYGB for nonobesity indications, were excluded.

RESULTS

Thirty-eight patients were identified. GERCP was initially performed in 17 patients, whereas TS was performed in 21. Thirty-day mortality was 0% in our cohort, and 30-d morbidity was similar between GERCP and TS (29% versus 10%; P = 0.207). Resolution of symptoms after initial therapy was seen in 41% of GERCP (7/17) and 67% of TS (14/21) (P = 0.190), respectively, and overall after 35% (8/23) and 64% (16/24) of procedures performed (P = 0.042). Symptom resolution, as defined by the median ratio of days of total remission by total days of observed follow-up, was shorter after initial and all interventions with GERCP compared with TS (0.67 versus 1.00, P = 0.036 and 0.52 versus 1.00, P = 0.028, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Endoscopic and surgical treatment of SOD had similar morbidity and mortality. However, treatment success and duration of remission was higher in those treated with surgery.

摘要

背景

肥胖患者行 Roux-en-Y 胃旁路术(RYGB)后,Oddi 括约肌功能障碍(SOD)的管理需要先进的技术(经胃 Gastrostomy 的内镜逆行胰胆管造影术 [GERCP])。经十二指肠括约肌成形术(TS)也有实施,但存在手术风险。我们假设 TS 会增加发病率和死亡率,但会提供更持久的症状缓解。

方法

研究纳入了 2005 年至 2016 年间因肥胖而行 RYGB 并因 I 型或 II 型 SOD 而行内镜或手术治疗的所有患者。排除了 III 型 SOD 患者或因非肥胖指征而行 RYGB 的患者。

结果

共确定了 38 例患者。17 例患者最初行 GERCP,21 例患者行 TS。本队列中 30 天死亡率为 0%,GERCP 和 TS 的 30 天发病率相似(29%比 10%;P=0.207)。初次治疗后症状缓解分别见于 GERCP(7/17,41%)和 TS(14/21,67%)(P=0.190),初次治疗和所有治疗后(8/23,35%和 16/24,64%)的总体缓解率(P=0.042)。根据观察随访期间总缓解天数与总天数的中位数比值,GERCP 与 TS 相比,初次和所有干预的症状缓解时间更短(0.67 比 1.00,P=0.036 和 0.52 比 1.00,P=0.028)。

结论

内镜和手术治疗 SOD 的发病率和死亡率相似。然而,手术治疗的成功率和缓解持续时间更高。

相似文献

1
Sphincter of Oddi Dysfunction After Gastric Bypass: Surgical or Endoscopic Therapy?胃旁路术后Oddi 括约肌功能障碍:手术还是内镜治疗?
J Surg Res. 2019 Jun;238:41-47. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2019.01.013. Epub 2019 Feb 6.
2
Outcomes of Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) and Sphincterotomy for Suspected Sphincter of Oddi Dysfunction (SOD) Post Roux-En-Y Gastric Bypass.内镜逆行胰胆管造影术(ERCP)及括约肌切开术治疗 Roux-en-Y 胃旁路术后疑似Oddi括约肌功能障碍(SOD)的疗效
Obes Surg. 2017 Oct;27(10):2656-2662. doi: 10.1007/s11695-017-2696-4.
3
Sphincter of Oddi dysfunction after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass.Roux-en-Y胃旁路术后Oddi括约肌功能障碍
Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2009 Sep-Oct;5(5):571-5. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2008.12.009. Epub 2009 Feb 21.
4
ERCP via gastrostomy vs. double balloon enteroscopy in patients with prior bariatric Roux-en-Y gastric bypass surgery.经胃造口内镜逆行胆胰管造影术与双气囊小肠镜在 Roux-en-Y 胃旁路手术史患者中的应用比较。
Surg Endosc. 2013 Aug;27(8):2894-9. doi: 10.1007/s00464-013-2850-6. Epub 2013 Jun 21.
5
Contemporary Outcomes of Transduodenal Sphincteroplasty: the Importance of Surgical Quality.经十二指肠胰管括约肌切开术的当代疗效:手术质量的重要性。
J Gastrointest Surg. 2023 Dec;27(12):2885-2892. doi: 10.1007/s11605-022-05539-y. Epub 2023 Dec 7.
6
Incidence and predictors of post-ERCP pancreatitis in patients with suspected sphincter of Oddi dysfunction undergoing biliary or dual sphincterotomy: results from the EPISOD prospective multicenter randomized sham-controlled study.疑似Oddi 括约肌功能障碍患者行胆管或双括约肌切开术的 ERCP 后胰腺炎的发生率和预测因素:来自 EPISOD 前瞻性多中心随机假对照研究的结果。
Endoscopy. 2015 Oct;47(10):884-90. doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1392418. Epub 2015 Jul 10.
7
Complications of endoscopic sphincterotomy. A prospective series with emphasis on the increased risk associated with sphincter of Oddi dysfunction and nondilated bile ducts.内镜括约肌切开术的并发症。一项前瞻性研究系列,重点关注与Oddi括约肌功能障碍和非扩张胆管相关的风险增加。
Gastroenterology. 1991 Oct;101(4):1068-75.
8
Prospective comparison of secretin-stimulated magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography with manometry in the diagnosis of sphincter of Oddi dysfunction types II and III.在诊断II型和III型Oddi括约肌功能障碍中,促胰液素刺激磁共振胰胆管造影与测压法的前瞻性比较。
Gut. 2007 Jun;56(6):809-13. doi: 10.1136/gut.2006.099267. Epub 2006 Sep 27.
9
Single-session ERCP in patients with previous Roux-en-Y gastric bypass using percutaneous-assisted transprosthetic endoscopic therapy: a case series.经皮辅助经吻合口内镜治疗既往 Roux-en-Y 胃旁路术后患者单次内镜逆行胰胆管造影术:病例系列研究。
Endoscopy. 2013 Aug;45(8):671-5. doi: 10.1055/s-0033-1344029. Epub 2013 Jul 23.
10
Frequency of sphincter of Oddi dysfunction in patients with previously normal sphincter of Oddi manometry studies.Oddi 括约肌功能障碍在先前 Oddi 括约肌测压正常患者中的频率。
Endoscopy. 2010 May;42(5):369-74. doi: 10.1055/s-0029-1215374. Epub 2009 Dec 4.

引用本文的文献

1
Current treatment of biliary Sphincter of Oddi Dysfunction.Oddi括约肌功能障碍的当前治疗方法。
Front Med (Lausanne). 2024 May 17;11:1380640. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1380640. eCollection 2024.
2
Endoscopic sphincterotomy for adults with biliary sphincter of Oddi dysfunction.成人胆胰管壶腹括约肌功能障碍的内镜下括约肌切开术。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Mar 22;3(3):CD014944. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014944.pub2.