Suppr超能文献

评估幼儿拼写的哪些方法能最好地预测其后期的拼写表现?

What Methods of Scoring Young Children's Spelling Best Predict Later Spelling Performance?

作者信息

Treiman Rebecca, Caravolas Markéta, Kessler Brett

机构信息

Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Washington University in St. Louis.

School of Psychology, Bangor University.

出版信息

J Res Read. 2019 Feb;42(1):80-96. doi: 10.1111/1467-9817.12241. Epub 2018 May 11.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Children's spellings are often scored as correct or incorrect, but other measures may be better predictors of later spelling performance.

METHOD

We examined seven measures of spelling in Reception Year and Year 1 (5-6 years old) as predictors of performance on a standardized spelling test in Year 2 (age 7).

RESULTS

Correctness was the best predictor of later spelling by the middle of Year 1, and it significantly outperformed a binary measure of phonological plausibility at the end of Reception Year. Nonbinary measures based on Levenshtein distance were significant predictors of later spelling in the middle of Reception Year and in children who produced no correct spellings. Some widely used scales performed less well with children who did not yet produce any correct spellings.

CONCLUSIONS

Nonbinary measures of spelling performance can predict later spelling performance, but for a more restricted period than anticipated based on many theories.

摘要

背景

儿童的拼写通常按正确或错误来计分,但其他衡量标准可能是预测其日后拼写表现的更好指标。

方法

我们考察了 Reception 年级和一年级(5 - 6 岁)的七种拼写衡量标准,作为二年级(7 岁)标准化拼写测试表现的预测指标。

结果

到一年级中期,拼写的正确性是日后拼写表现的最佳预测指标,并且在 Reception 年级末,它显著优于语音合理性的二元衡量标准。基于莱文斯坦距离的非二元衡量标准在 Reception 年级中期以及未写出任何正确拼写的儿童中是日后拼写表现的显著预测指标。一些广泛使用的量表在尚未写出任何正确拼写的儿童中表现较差。

结论

拼写表现的非二元衡量标准可以预测日后的拼写表现,但预测的时间段比基于许多理论预期的更有限。

相似文献

8
Use of Letter Names Benefits Young Children's Spelling.字母名称的使用有益于幼儿拼写。
Psychol Sci. 2020 Jan;31(1):43-50. doi: 10.1177/0956797619888837. Epub 2019 Dec 3.
9
Invented Spelling: Developmental Patterns in Kindergarten Children and Guidelines for Early Literacy Intervention.
Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch. 1997 Oct 1;28(4):333-343. doi: 10.1044/0161-1461.2804.333.

引用本文的文献

1
5
Editorial: Spelling Across Orthographies.社论:跨正字法的拼写
Front Psychol. 2021 Jun 10;12:700604. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.700604. eCollection 2021.
7
Non-phonological Strategies in Spelling Development.拼写发展中的非语音策略。
Front Psychol. 2020 Jun 5;11:1071. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01071. eCollection 2020.

本文引用的文献

2
Theory-Guided Spelling Assessment and Intervention: A Case Study.理论指导下的拼写评估与干预:一项案例研究
Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch. 2001 Jul 1;32(3):182-195. doi: 10.1044/0161-1461(2001/017).

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验