Niolaki Georgia Z, Negoita Alexandra, Vousden Janet I, Terzopoulos Aris R, Taylor Laura, Masterson Jackie
School of Education, Bath Spa University, Bath, United Kingdom.
School of Psychological, Social and Behavioral Sciences, Coventry University, Coventry, United Kingdom.
Front Psychol. 2023 May 11;14:1178427. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1178427. eCollection 2023.
Spelling is an essential foundation for reading and writing. However, many children leave school with spelling difficulties. By understanding the processes children use when they spell, we can intervene with appropriate instruction tailored to their needs.
Our study aimed to identify key processes (lexical-semantic and phonological) by using a spelling assessment that distinguishes different printed letter strings/word types (regular and irregular words, and pseudowords). Misspellings in the test from 641 pupils in Reception Year to Year 6 were scored using alternatives to binary correct versus incorrect scoring systems. The measures looked at phonological plausibility, phoneme representations and letter distance. These have been used successfully in the past but not with a spelling test that distinguishes irregularly spelled words from regular words and pseudowords.
The findings suggest that children in primary school rely on both lexical-semantic and phonological processes to spell all types of letter string, but this varies depending on the level of spelling experience (younger Foundation/Key stage 1 and older Key stage 2). Although children in younger year groups seemed to rely more on phonics, based on the strongest correlation coefficients for all word types, with further spelling experience, lexical processes seemed to be more evident, depending on the type of word examined.
The findings have implications for the way we teach and assess spelling and could prove to be valuable for educators.
拼写是阅读和写作的重要基础。然而,许多孩子在毕业时仍存在拼写困难。通过了解孩子们拼写时所使用的过程,我们可以提供符合他们需求的针对性指导。
我们的研究旨在通过一项拼写评估来确定关键过程(词汇语义和语音),该评估能够区分不同的印刷字母串/单词类型(规则和不规则单词以及假词)。对来自 Reception Year 到六年级的641名学生测试中的拼写错误,使用了区别于二进制正确与错误评分系统的替代方法进行评分。这些测量考察了语音合理性、音素表征和字母距离。这些方法过去已成功使用,但未用于区分不规则拼写单词与规则单词及假词的拼写测试。
研究结果表明,小学阶段的孩子在拼写所有类型的字母串时都依赖词汇语义和语音过程,但这会因拼写经验水平(低年级基础阶段/关键阶段1和高年级关键阶段2)的不同而有所变化。尽管低年级组的孩子似乎更依赖自然拼读法,这基于所有单词类型中最强的相关系数,但随着拼写经验的增加,词汇过程似乎更明显,这取决于所考察的单词类型。
这些研究结果对我们教授和评估拼写的方式具有启示意义,可能对教育工作者很有价值。