Magalhães Sofia, Mesquita Ana, Filipe Marisa, Veloso Andreia, Castro São Luís, Limpo Teresa
Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal.
Front Psychol. 2020 Mar 27;11:547. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00547. eCollection 2020.
There is consensus among researchers that misspellings are something to avoid. However, misspellings also convey relevant information for researchers and educators. The present study is a first effort toward the analysis of misspellings produced by Portuguese children. Specifically, we aimed to examine the association between misspellings in dictation and composing tasks; compare misspellings across grade, type, and task; and test the contribution of different misspellings produced in dictation and in composition to text quality. For that, 933 Portuguese pupils in Grade 2 ( = 297), Grade 4 ( = 302), and Grade 6 ( = 334) performed a spelling-to-dictation task and wrote an opinion essay. Misspellings were categorized into phonetically inaccurate, phonetically accurate, and stress mark errors. Results showed correlations between the same type of misspellings across tasks for phonetically inaccurate errors in Grades 2 and 4, and phonetically accurate errors in Grade 2. Moreover, pupils produced more misspellings in dictation than composing tasks, and there was a progressive decrease in phonetically inaccurate and phonetically accurate misspellings across schooling, though stress mark errors were more frequent in Grade 4 than in other grades. Finally, spelling errors predicted text quality, particularly in younger children. Overall, these findings are aligned with extant results on spelling development and support current voices claiming for fine-grained analyses of misspellings. As they may vary across grade and task, and impact text quality differently, a detailed approach to spelling errors can provide valuable information on the development of this skill.
研究人员一致认为拼写错误是需要避免的。然而,拼写错误也能为研究人员和教育工作者传达相关信息。本研究是对葡萄牙儿童所产生的拼写错误进行分析的首次尝试。具体而言,我们旨在研究听写任务和写作任务中拼写错误之间的关联;比较不同年级、类型和任务中的拼写错误;并测试听写和写作中产生的不同拼写错误对文本质量的影响。为此,933名葡萄牙二年级(n = 297)、四年级(n = 302)和六年级(n = 334)的学生完成了一项听写任务,并写了一篇议论文。拼写错误被分为语音不准确、语音准确和重音标记错误。结果显示,二年级和四年级语音不准确错误以及二年级语音准确错误在不同任务中相同类型的拼写错误之间存在相关性。此外,学生在听写任务中产生的拼写错误比写作任务中更多,并且随着学业进展,语音不准确和语音准确的拼写错误逐渐减少,尽管重音标记错误在四年级比其他年级更频繁。最后,拼写错误可以预测文本质量,尤其是在年幼的儿童中。总体而言,这些发现与现有的拼写发展研究结果一致,并支持当前主张对拼写错误进行细粒度分析的观点。由于拼写错误可能因年级和任务而异,并且对文本质量的影响也不同,因此对拼写错误进行详细分析可以为这项技能的发展提供有价值的信息。