• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于技术的教育干预对癌症儿童和青少年相关赋权结果的有效性:一项定量系统评价。

Effectiveness of technology-based educational interventions on the empowerment related outcomes of children and young adults with cancer: A quantitative systematic review.

机构信息

Nursing Division, KK Women's and Children's Hospital, Singapore, Singapore.

Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, Alice Lee Centre for Nursing Studies, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.

出版信息

J Adv Nurs. 2019 Oct;75(10):2072-2084. doi: 10.1111/jan.13974. Epub 2019 Mar 21.

DOI:10.1111/jan.13974
PMID:30740758
Abstract

AIM

To determine the effectiveness of technological-based educational interventions on the empowerment-related outcomes of children and young adults with cancer.

DESIGN

Quantitative systematic review.

DATA SOURCES

Six electronic databases, including PubMed, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, CINAHL, Scopus, and PsycINFO, were searched to identify eligible randomized controlled trials from each database's point of inception to December 2017. Grey literature was also searched from ProQuest and MedNar.

REVIEW METHODS

A narrative summary of the results was undertaken owing to the small number of eligible studies and high heterogeneity across the studies.

RESULTS

Five studies were included in the review. Five empowerment-related outcomes under the domain "patient states" were identified at differing time points of 3-month postintervention, immediate postintervention, and during treatment: (a) self-efficacy; (b) cancer knowledge; (c) health locus of control; (d) emotional well-being; and (e) quality of life. At 3-month postintervention, health locus of control was found to be significant in two studies and self-efficacy and cancer knowledge were found to be significant in one study. No difference in quality of life was found. At immediate postintervention, a beneficial indication was observed. During treatment, no statistical significance was found regarding the effectiveness of a technological-based cognitive behavioural package.

CONCLUSION

Weak evidences led to inconclusive findings on the effectiveness of technological-based educational interventions on the empowerment-related outcomes of children and young adults with cancer. Future research will benefit from well-designed clinical trials that use a common outcome measurement to provide more information regarding the effectiveness of such interventions.

摘要

目的

确定基于技术的教育干预措施对癌症儿童和青少年相关赋权结果的有效性。

设计

定量系统评价。

资料来源

从每个数据库的起始点到 2017 年 12 月,在 6 个电子数据库(包括 PubMed、Cochrane Library、EMBASE、CINAHL、Scopus 和 PsycINFO)中搜索了符合条件的随机对照试验。还从 ProQuest 和 MedNar 中搜索了灰色文献。

综述方法

由于合格研究数量少且研究之间存在高度异质性,因此进行了结果的叙述性总结。

结果

共纳入 5 项研究。在不同的 3 个月干预后、即时干预后和治疗期间,确定了“患者状态”下的 5 个与赋权相关的结果:(a)自我效能;(b)癌症知识;(c)健康控制源;(d)情绪健康;和(e)生活质量。在 3 个月的干预后,有两项研究发现健康控制源具有统计学意义,一项研究发现自我效能和癌症知识具有统计学意义。生活质量没有差异。即时干预后,观察到有益的迹象。在治疗期间,没有发现基于技术的认知行为包的有效性有统计学意义。

结论

基于技术的教育干预措施对癌症儿童和青少年相关赋权结果的有效性的证据较弱,导致结论不确定。未来的研究将受益于设计良好的临床试验,这些试验使用共同的结果测量来提供有关此类干预措施有效性的更多信息。

相似文献

1
Effectiveness of technology-based educational interventions on the empowerment related outcomes of children and young adults with cancer: A quantitative systematic review.基于技术的教育干预对癌症儿童和青少年相关赋权结果的有效性:一项定量系统评价。
J Adv Nurs. 2019 Oct;75(10):2072-2084. doi: 10.1111/jan.13974. Epub 2019 Mar 21.
2
The effectiveness of patient navigation programs for adult cancer patients undergoing treatment: a systematic review.成人癌症患者治疗期间患者导航项目的有效性:一项系统评价
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Feb;14(2):295-321. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2016-2324.
3
The effectiveness of therapeutic patient education on adherence to oral anti-cancer medicines in adult cancer patients in ambulatory care settings: a systematic review.门诊护理环境中成人癌症患者接受治疗性患者教育对口服抗癌药物依从性的有效性:一项系统综述
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jun 12;13(5):244-92. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-2057.
4
Educational interventions to improve quality of life in people with chronic inflammatory skin diseases: systematic reviews of clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness.改善慢性炎症性皮肤病患者生活质量的教育干预措施:临床有效性和成本效益的系统评价
Health Technol Assess. 2015 Oct;19(86):1-176, v-vi. doi: 10.3310/hta19860.
5
The effectiveness of internet-based e-learning on clinician behavior and patient outcomes: a systematic review protocol.基于互联网的电子学习对临床医生行为和患者结局的有效性:一项系统评价方案。
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):52-64. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1919.
6
Effectiveness of school-based family asthma educational programs in quality of life and asthma exacerbations in asthmatic children aged five to 18: a systematic review.基于学校的家庭哮喘教育项目对5至18岁哮喘儿童生活质量及哮喘发作的影响:一项系统评价
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Nov;14(11):113-138. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-003181.
7
8
Effectiveness of interventions that assist caregivers to support people with dementia living in the community: a systematic review.干预措施对帮助照顾者支持社区中痴呆症患者的有效性:系统评价。
Int J Evid Based Healthc. 2008 Jun;6(2):137-72. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-1609.2008.00090.x.
9
A systematic review to examine the impact of psycho-educational interventions on health outcomes and costs in adults and children with difficult asthma.一项系统性综述,旨在研究心理教育干预对患有难治性哮喘的成人和儿童的健康结局及成本的影响。
Health Technol Assess. 2005 Jun;9(23):iii-iv, 1-167. doi: 10.3310/hta9230.
10
Interventions for promoting reintegration and reducing harmful behaviour and lifestyles in street-connected children and young people.促进与街头有联系的儿童和年轻人重新融入社会并减少有害行为及生活方式的干预措施。
Evid Based Child Health. 2013 Jul;8(4):1140-272. doi: 10.1002/ebch.1923.

引用本文的文献

1
Influencing factors of self-advocacy in stroke patients from multiple perspectives: a qualitative study.从多视角探讨卒中患者自我倡导的影响因素:一项定性研究
BMC Health Serv Res. 2025 Mar 18;25(1):396. doi: 10.1186/s12913-025-12563-6.
2
Self-advocacy positive perceptions and stage experiences in patients who had a stroke: a qualitative study in China.中风患者的自我倡导、积极认知及阶段体验:一项中国的定性研究
BMJ Open. 2024 Dec 20;14(12):e091273. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-091273.
3
Impact of telenurse-led intervention in clinical trials on health literacy, empowerment, and health outcomes in patients with solid tumours: a pilot quasi-experimental study.
远程护士主导的干预措施在实体瘤患者临床试验中对健康素养、自我效能感及健康结局的影响:一项试点类实验研究
BMC Nurs. 2024 Feb 2;23(1):86. doi: 10.1186/s12912-023-01641-x.
4
Effectiveness of Virtual Reality in Anxiety and Pain Management in Children and Adolescents Receiving Cancer Treatment: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.虚拟现实在癌症治疗儿童和青少年焦虑和疼痛管理中的有效性:系统评价和随机对照试验的荟萃分析。
J Med Syst. 2023 Oct 10;47(1):103. doi: 10.1007/s10916-023-01995-4.
5
Digital health and telehealth in cancer care: a scoping review of reviews.数字健康和远程医疗在癌症护理中的应用:系统评价综述。
Lancet Digit Health. 2023 May;5(5):e316-e327. doi: 10.1016/S2589-7500(23)00049-3.
6
Empowerment through technology: A systematic evaluation of the content and quality of mobile applications to empower individuals with cancer.通过技术赋权:系统评估赋能癌症个体的移动应用程序的内容和质量。
Int J Med Inform. 2022 Jul;163:104782. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2022.104782. Epub 2022 Apr 29.
7
Maximizing Participant Engagement, Participation, and Retention in Cohort Studies Using Digital Methods: Rapid Review to Inform the Next Generation of Very Large Birth Cohorts.利用数字方法最大限度地提高队列研究中的参与者参与度、参与度和保留率:快速审查以告知下一代非常大型的出生队列。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 May 14;23(5):e23499. doi: 10.2196/23499.
8
A Conceptual Framework of Self-advocacy in Women With Cancer.癌症女性患者的自我倡导概念框架
ANS Adv Nurs Sci. 2021;44(1):E1-E13. doi: 10.1097/ANS.0000000000000342.
9
Back to school with telepresence robot technology: A qualitative pilot study about how telepresence robots help school-aged children and adolescents with cancer to remain socially and academically connected with their school classes during treatment.远程临场机器人技术:重返校园——一项关于远程临场机器人如何帮助癌症学龄儿童和青少年在治疗期间与学校班级保持社交和学业联系的定性试点研究。
Nurs Open. 2020 Mar 12;7(4):988-997. doi: 10.1002/nop2.471. eCollection 2020 Jul.