Suppr超能文献

基于真实世界临床证据评估西班牙 2 型糖尿病患者使用固定比例复方胰岛素德谷胰岛素/利拉鲁肽(IDegLira)的长期成本效益。

Evaluating the long-term cost-effectiveness of fixed-ratio combination insulin degludec/liraglutide (IDegLira) for type 2 diabetes in Spain based on real-world clinical evidence.

机构信息

Endocrinology and Nutrition Unit, Hospital Torrecardenas, Clinica San Pedro, Almeria, Spain.

Diabetes Referral Unit, Hospital Clinico Universitario de Valencia, Valencia, Spain.

出版信息

Diabetes Obes Metab. 2019 Jun;21(6):1349-1356. doi: 10.1111/dom.13660. Epub 2019 Mar 20.

Abstract

AIM

To evaluate the long-term cost-effectiveness of fixed-ratio combination insulin degludec/liraglutide (IDegLira) versus comparator regimens for type 2 diabetes in Spain, based on real-world evidence.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Clinical data were taken from the European Xultophy Treatment Retrospective Audit (EXTRA) real-world evidence study in which patients failing to meet glycaemic targets were switched to IDegLira. Baseline regimens (prior to IDegLira treatment) were categorized as: multiple daily insulin injections (MDI; 28%); glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists in combination with insulin (24%); basal insulin (19%); GLP-1 receptor agonists (10%); and non-injectable medications (19%). The IQVIA CORE Diabetes Model was used to project long-term outcomes for patients switching to IDegLira or continuing their baseline regimens (excluding non-injectable regimens). Costs were accounted from a Spanish National Health System perspective. Future costs and clinical benefits were discounted at 3% annually and sensitivity analyses were performed.

RESULTS

IDegLira was projected to reduce the incidence of diabetes-related complications and improve quality-adjusted life expectancy versus all four comparators. IDegLira reduced direct medical costs versus GLP-1 receptor agonists in combination with insulin, and versus GLP-1 receptor agonist therapy, and was therefore considered dominant (cost saving while improving outcomes). IDegLira was found to be cost-effective versus MDI and basal insulin with incremental cost-effectiveness ratios of EUR 3013 per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) gained and EUR 6890 per QALY gained, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Long-term projections based on real-world evidence indicated that IDegLira is likely to improve clinical outcomes and reduce costs or be cost-effective compared with other injectable regimens in people with type 2 diabetes in Spain.

摘要

目的

基于真实世界证据,评估固定比例复方胰岛素德谷胰岛素/利拉鲁肽(IDegLira)与 2 型糖尿病对照治疗方案在西班牙的长期成本效益。

材料与方法

临床数据来自于欧洲 Xultophy 治疗回顾性审计(EXTRA)真实世界证据研究,该研究中,血糖控制不达标的患者换用 IDegLira。基线治疗方案(在接受 IDegLira 治疗之前)分为:每日多次胰岛素注射(MDI;28%);胰高血糖素样肽-1(GLP-1)受体激动剂联合胰岛素(24%);基础胰岛素(19%);GLP-1 受体激动剂(10%);以及非注射类药物(19%)。采用 IQVIA CORE 糖尿病模型预测换用 IDegLira 或继续其基线治疗方案(不包括非注射类方案)的患者的长期结局。从西班牙国家卫生系统角度计算成本。未来成本和临床获益按 3%贴现,进行敏感性分析。

结果

与所有 4 种对照相比,IDegLira 预计可降低糖尿病相关并发症的发生率并提高质量调整预期寿命。与 GLP-1 受体激动剂联合胰岛素和 GLP-1 受体激动剂治疗相比,IDegLira 降低了直接医疗成本,因此被认为具有优势(在改善结局的同时降低成本)。与 MDI 和基础胰岛素相比,IDegLira 的增量成本效益比分别为每质量调整生命年(QALY)增加 3013 欧元和每 QALY 增加 6890 欧元,因此被认为具有成本效益。

结论

基于真实世界证据的长期预测表明,与西班牙 2 型糖尿病患者的其他注射类方案相比,IDegLira 可能改善临床结局并降低成本或具有成本效益。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8592/6594226/77408edd5244/DOM-21-1349-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验