Suppr超能文献

比较两种术后调强放疗和二维放疗在四肢和躯干软组织肉瘤患者中的疗效和毒性。

Comparison of outcome and toxicity of postoperative intensity-modulated radiation therapy with two-dimensional radiotherapy in patients with soft tissue sarcoma of extremities and trunk.

机构信息

Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.

出版信息

Cancer Med. 2019 Mar;8(3):902-909. doi: 10.1002/cam4.1919. Epub 2019 Feb 10.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

To compare the survival outcomes and late toxicities of postoperative intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) with two-dimensional radiotherapy (2D-RT) for patients with soft tissue sarcoma (STS) of extremities and trunk.

METHODS

274 consecutive patients with nonmetastatic STS of extremities and trunk treated with postoperative IMRT (n = 187) and 2D-RT (n = 87) were analyzed. Survival was calculated by using Kaplan-Meier method. Independent prognostic factors were identified using Cox stepwise regression analysis for variables with a P-value <0.1 in univariate analysis.

RESULTS

With a median follow-up time of 58.1 months, 30 local recurrences, 66 distant metastases, and 40 deaths occurred. Compared to 2D-RT group, the IMRT group had higher 5-year local recurrence-free survival (LRFS) (91.1% vs 80.8%; P = 0.029), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) (80.0% vs 69.7%; P = 0.048), disease-free survival (DFS) (75.2% vs 59.2%; P = 0.021), and overall survival (OS) (90.2% vs 81.0%; P = 0.029). Multivariate analysis showed IMRT was an independent favorable factor for LRFS, DMFS, DFS, and OS. For late toxicities, the patients in IMRT group enjoyed lower incidences of ≥Grade 2 joint stiffness (3.9% vs 12.3%; P = 0.041) and ≥Grade 3 fractures (0.0% vs 3.4%; P = 0.25) than those in 2D-RT group. ≥Grade 2 Edema was similar between these two groups (4.8% vs 9.2%; P = 0.183).

CONCLUSIONS

When compared with conventional techniques, postoperative IMRT seems to provide better LRFS, DMFS, DFS, and OS and less late toxicities in patients with STS of extremities and trunk, which should be offered as a preferred treatment.

摘要

背景

比较术后调强放疗(IMRT)与二维放疗(2D-RT)治疗肢体和躯干软组织肉瘤(STS)患者的生存结局和晚期毒性。

方法

分析了 274 例接受术后 IMRT(n=187)和 2D-RT(n=87)治疗的非转移性肢体和躯干 STS 患者。采用 Kaplan-Meier 法计算生存率。采用 Cox 逐步回归分析对单因素分析中 P 值<0.1 的变量进行独立预后因素分析。

结果

中位随访时间为 58.1 个月,30 例局部复发,66 例远处转移,40 例死亡。与 2D-RT 组相比,IMRT 组 5 年局部无复发生存率(LRFS)(91.1% vs 80.8%;P=0.029)、无远处转移生存率(DMFS)(80.0% vs 69.7%;P=0.048)、无病生存率(DFS)(75.2% vs 59.2%;P=0.021)和总生存率(OS)(90.2% vs 81.0%;P=0.029)更高。多因素分析显示,IMRT 是 LRFS、DMFS、DFS 和 OS 的独立有利因素。晚期毒性方面,IMRT 组关节僵硬≥2 级(3.9% vs 12.3%;P=0.041)和≥3 级骨折(0.0% vs 3.4%;P=0.25)的发生率低于 2D-RT 组。两组间≥2 级水肿发生率相似(4.8% vs 9.2%;P=0.183)。

结论

与传统技术相比,术后 IMRT 似乎为肢体和躯干 STS 患者提供了更好的 LRFS、DMFS、DFS 和 OS,且晚期毒性更低,应作为首选治疗方法。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/96b1/6434203/8367a7ff4a06/CAM4-8-902-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验