• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

与初次手术相比,在 IIIC-IV 期卵巢癌患者中,间隔减瘤手术后的肠道切除率降低,但肠道相关发病率并未降低。

Bowel resection rate but not bowel related morbidity is decreased after interval debulking surgery compared to primary surgery in patents with stage IIIC-IV ovarian cancer.

机构信息

Department of Gynaecologic Oncology, Nuffield Department of Women and Reproductive Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.

出版信息

J Gynecol Oncol. 2019 Mar;30(2):e25. doi: 10.3802/jgo.2019.30.e25. Epub 2018 Nov 30.

DOI:10.3802/jgo.2019.30.e25
PMID:30740956
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6393637/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To assess the morbidity associate with rectosigmoid resection (RSR) in patients with stage IIIC-IV ovarian cancer (OC) undergone primary debulking surgery (PDS) vs. interval debulking surgery (IDS) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT).

METHODS

From the Oxford Advanced OC database, we retrieved all patients who underwent surgery between January 2009 and July 2016 and included all patients who underwent RSR. We compared the rates of overall related and not-related morbidity and bowel diversion in patients undergone RSR during PDS vs. IDS.

RESULTS

Three hundred and seventy-one patients underwent surgery: 126 in PDS group and 245 in IDS group. Fifty-two patients in the PDS group (41.3%) and 65 patients in IDS group (26.5%) underwent RSR (p<0.001). Overall not related morbidity rate was 37.5% and 28.6%, p=0.625. Bowel specific complications affected 16.3% vs. 11.1% of the patients (p=0.577). IDS group had higher rate of bowel diversion compared with PDS (46.0% vs. 26.5%, p=0.048).

CONCLUSION

NACT was associated to an overall reduced rate of RSR compared to IDS. No differences in overall related and not-related complications in patients requiring RSR were seen between the 2 groups. Patients in the IDS group had a significantly higher rate of bowel diversion.

摘要

目的

评估接受新辅助化疗(NACT)后行初次肿瘤细胞减灭术(PDS)与间隔肿瘤细胞减灭术(IDS)的 IIIC-IV 期卵巢癌(OC)患者行直肠乙状结肠切除术(RSR)的发病率。

方法

我们从牛津高级 OC 数据库中检索了 2009 年 1 月至 2016 年 7 月间接受手术的所有患者,并纳入所有接受 RSR 的患者。我们比较了在 PDS 与 IDS 下行 RSR 的患者的总相关和非相关发病率以及肠道转流率。

结果

371 例患者接受了手术:PDS 组 126 例,IDS 组 245 例。PDS 组中有 52 例(41.3%)和 IDS 组中有 65 例(26.5%)患者行 RSR(p<0.001)。总非相关发病率为 37.5%和 28.6%,p=0.625。肠道特异性并发症分别影响 16.3%和 11.1%的患者(p=0.577)。与 PDS 相比,IDS 组肠道转流率更高(46.0% vs. 26.5%,p=0.048)。

结论

与 IDS 相比,NACT 与 RSR 总体发生率降低相关。在需要 RSR 的患者中,两组之间总相关和非相关并发症无差异。IDS 组患者肠道转流率明显更高。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0580/6393637/cc6b769df42a/jgo-30-e25-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0580/6393637/cc6b769df42a/jgo-30-e25-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0580/6393637/cc6b769df42a/jgo-30-e25-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Bowel resection rate but not bowel related morbidity is decreased after interval debulking surgery compared to primary surgery in patents with stage IIIC-IV ovarian cancer.与初次手术相比,在 IIIC-IV 期卵巢癌患者中,间隔减瘤手术后的肠道切除率降低,但肠道相关发病率并未降低。
J Gynecol Oncol. 2019 Mar;30(2):e25. doi: 10.3802/jgo.2019.30.e25. Epub 2018 Nov 30.
2
Primary surgery or interval debulking for advanced epithelial ovarian cancer: does it matter?晚期上皮性卵巢癌的初次手术或间隔减瘤术:有关系吗?
Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2014 Oct;24(8):1420-8. doi: 10.1097/IGC.0000000000000241.
3
Optimizing the treatment of ovarian cancer: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy and interval debulking versus primary debulking surgery for epithelial ovarian cancers likely to have suboptimal resection.优化卵巢癌治疗:新辅助化疗和间隔肿瘤缩小术与初始肿瘤细胞减灭术治疗可能无法实现理想切除的上皮性卵巢癌。
Gynecol Oncol. 2017 Feb;144(2):266-273. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2016.11.021. Epub 2016 Dec 1.
4
Patterns of Recurrence and Clinical Outcome of Patients With Stage IIIC to Stage IV Epithelial Ovarian Cancer in Complete Response After Primary Debulking Surgery Plus Chemotherapy or Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Followed by Interval Debulking Surgery: An Italian Multicenter Retrospective Study.IIIC期至IV期上皮性卵巢癌患者在初次肿瘤细胞减灭术加化疗或新辅助化疗后行中间型肿瘤细胞减灭术达到完全缓解后的复发模式及临床结局:一项意大利多中心回顾性研究
Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2017 Jan;27(1):28-36. doi: 10.1097/IGC.0000000000000843.
5
Primary debulking surgery vs. neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by interval debulking surgery for patients with advanced ovarian cancer.初次肿瘤细胞减灭术与新辅助化疗后间隔肿瘤细胞减灭术治疗晚期卵巢癌的疗效比较。
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2016 Jan;293(1):163-168. doi: 10.1007/s00404-015-3813-z. Epub 2015 Jul 22.
6
Trends in specific procedures performed at the time of cytoreduction for ovarian cancer: Is interval debulking surgery truly less radical? A Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center Team Ovary study.卵巢癌细胞减灭术时特定手术操作的趋势:间隔性肿瘤细胞减灭术真的不那么激进吗?纪念斯隆凯特琳癌症中心卵巢研究团队。
Gynecol Oncol. 2024 Aug;187:80-84. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2024.05.009. Epub 2024 May 11.
7
Primary debulking surgery versus neoadjuvant chemotherapy in stage IV ovarian cancer.在 IV 期卵巢癌中,初次肿瘤细胞减灭术与新辅助化疗的比较。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2012 Mar;19(3):959-65. doi: 10.1245/s10434-011-2100-x. Epub 2011 Oct 13.
8
Neoadjuvant chemotherapy or primary debulking surgery in FIGO IIIC and IV patients; results from a survey study in the Netherlands.FIGO IIIC期和IV期患者的新辅助化疗或初次肿瘤减灭术;荷兰一项调查研究的结果
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2018 Apr;223:98-102. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2018.02.029. Epub 2018 Mar 6.
9
A prospective algorithm to reduce anastomotic leaks after rectosigmoid resection for gynecologic malignancies.一种降低妇科恶性肿瘤直肠乙状结肠切除术后吻合口漏的前瞻性算法。
Gynecol Oncol. 2017 Feb;144(2):343-347. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2016.11.032. Epub 2016 Dec 2.
10
What is the optimal treatment for obese patients with advanced ovarian carcinoma?对于晚期卵巢癌肥胖患者,最佳的治疗方法是什么?
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2014 Sep;211(3):231.e1-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2014.03.059. Epub 2014 Apr 1.

引用本文的文献

1
The surgical, histopathological characteristics, and survival outcome of ovarian clear cell carcinoma: a retrospective case series sharing the experience of a tertiary cancer centre.卵巢透明细胞癌的手术、组织病理学特征及生存结局:一项分享三级癌症中心经验的回顾性病例系列研究
Transl Cancer Res. 2024 Sep 30;13(9):5037-5049. doi: 10.21037/tcr-24-83. Epub 2024 Sep 11.
2
Impact of postoperative morbidity on outcomes in patients with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer undergoing intestinal surgery at the time of primary or interval cytoreductive surgery: A Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center Team Ovary study.术后并发症对行初次或间隔细胞减灭术时接受肠手术的晚期上皮性卵巢癌患者结局的影响:纪念斯隆-凯特琳癌症中心卵巢肿瘤协作组研究。
Gynecol Oncol. 2023 Dec;179:169-179. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2023.10.013. Epub 2023 Nov 21.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries.全球癌症统计数据 2018:GLOBOCAN 对全球 185 个国家/地区 36 种癌症的发病率和死亡率的估计。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2018 Nov;68(6):394-424. doi: 10.3322/caac.21492. Epub 2018 Sep 12.
2
Continuous improvement in primary Debulking surgery for advanced ovarian cancer: Do increased complete gross resection rates independently lead to increased progression-free and overall survival?在晚期卵巢癌的初级减瘤术中不断改进:更高的完全大体切除率是否能独立提高无进展生存期和总生存期?
Gynecol Oncol. 2018 Oct;151(1):24-31. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2018.08.014. Epub 2018 Aug 17.
3
Feasibility of laparoscopic Visceral-Peritoneal Debulking (L-VPD) in patients with stage III-IV ovarian cancer: the ULTRA-LAP trial pilot study.腹腔镜内脏腹膜减瘤术(L-VPD)治疗 III-IV 期卵巢癌患者的可行性:ULTRA-LAP 试验初步研究。
J Gynecol Oncol. 2024 Mar;35(2):e14. doi: 10.3802/jgo.2024.35.e14. Epub 2023 Oct 16.
4
Application and evaluation of transitory protective stoma in ovarian cancer surgery.临时性保护造口在卵巢癌手术中的应用及评价
Front Oncol. 2023 Mar 24;13:1118028. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1118028. eCollection 2023.
5
Anastomotic Leakage after Colorectal Surgery in Ovarian Cancer: Drainage, Stoma Utility and Risk Factors.卵巢癌结直肠手术后的吻合口漏:引流、造口的作用及危险因素
Cancers (Basel). 2022 Dec 18;14(24):6243. doi: 10.3390/cancers14246243.
6
Anastomotic Leak in Ovarian Cancer Cytoreduction Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.卵巢癌肿瘤细胞减灭术中吻合口漏:一项系统评价与Meta分析
Cancers (Basel). 2022 Nov 7;14(21):5464. doi: 10.3390/cancers14215464.
7
Surgery in Advanced Ovary Cancer: Primary versus Interval Cytoreduction.晚期卵巢癌手术:初次减瘤术与间隔期减瘤术
Diagnostics (Basel). 2022 Apr 14;12(4):988. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics12040988.
8
Rectosigmoid resection during Visceral-Peritoneal Debulking (VPD) in patients with stage IIIC-IV ovarian cancer: morbidity of gynecologic oncology vs. colorectal team.直肠乙状结肠切除术在 IIIC-IV 期卵巢癌内脏腹膜廓清术中的应用:妇科肿瘤组与结直肠组的发病率比较。
J Gynecol Oncol. 2021 May;32(3):e42. doi: 10.3802/jgo.2021.32.e42.
9
Clinical Significance of Mesenteric Lymph Node Involvement in the Pattern of Liver Metastasis in Patients with Ovarian Cancer.肠系膜淋巴结受累对卵巢癌肝转移模式的临床意义。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2021 Nov;28(12):7606-7613. doi: 10.1245/s10434-021-09899-8. Epub 2021 Apr 5.
Survival impact of low anterior resection in patients with epithelial ovarian cancer grossly confined to the pelvic cavity: a Korean multicenter study.
上皮性卵巢癌大体局限于盆腔行低位前切除术对生存的影响:一项韩国多中心研究。
J Gynecol Oncol. 2018 Jul;29(4):e60. doi: 10.3802/jgo.2018.29.e60. Epub 2018 Apr 13.
4
Morbidity of rectosigmoid resection in cytoreductive surgery for ovarian cancer. Risk factor analysis.直肠乙状结肠切除术在卵巢癌细胞减灭术中的发病率。危险因素分析。
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2018 Jun;44(6):750-753. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2018.01.005. Epub 2018 Jan 13.
5
Morbidity and reversal rate of ileostomy after bowel resection during Visceral-Peritoneal Debulking (VPD) in patients with stage IIIC-IV ovarian cancer.在晚期 IIIC-IV 期卵巢癌患者行内脏腹膜廓清术(VPD)时的肠切除术后造口并发症和逆转率。
Gynecol Oncol. 2018 Jan;148(1):74-78. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2017.11.017. Epub 2017 Nov 20.
6
The impact of type and number of bowel resections on anastomotic leakage risk in advanced ovarian cancer surgery.高级卵巢癌手术中肠切除术的类型和数量对吻合口漏风险的影响。
Gynecol Oncol. 2017 Sep;146(3):498-503. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2017.06.007. Epub 2017 Jun 10.
7
Multidisciplinary approach in the management of advanced ovarian cancer patients: A personalized approach. Results from a specialized ovarian cancer unit.晚期卵巢癌患者管理中的多学科方法:个性化方法。来自一家专业卵巢癌治疗单位的结果。
Gynecol Oncol. 2017 Mar;144(3):468-473. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2017.01.017. Epub 2017 Jan 20.
8
En-bloc resection of the pelvis (EnBRP) in patients with stage IIIC-IV ovarian cancer: A 10 steps standardised technique. Surgical and survival outcomes of primary vs. interval surgery.IIIC-IV期卵巢癌患者的盆腔整块切除术(EnBRP):一种10步标准化技术。初次手术与间隔手术的手术及生存结果。
Gynecol Oncol. 2017 Mar;144(3):564-570. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2016.12.019. Epub 2017 Jan 7.
9
Value of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Newly Diagnosed Advanced Ovarian Cancer: A European Perspective.新诊断晚期卵巢癌新辅助化疗的价值:欧洲视角
J Clin Oncol. 2017 Feb 20;35(6):587-590. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2016.71.0723. Epub 2017 Jan 9.
10
Total parietal peritonectomy with en bloc pelvic resection for advanced ovarian cancer with peritoneal carcinomatosis.对于伴有腹膜转移瘤的晚期卵巢癌,行全腹膜切除术并整块盆腔切除术。
Gynecol Oncol. 2016 Dec;143(3):688-689. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2016.10.014. Epub 2016 Oct 13.