• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

危重症患者同时接受哌拉西林他唑巴坦或头孢吡肟与万古霉素治疗的急性肾损伤风险。

The Risk of Acute Kidney Injury in Critically Ill Patients Receiving Concomitant Vancomycin With Piperacillin-Tazobactam or Cefepime.

机构信息

Department of Pharmacy, 24144Scripps Mercy Hospital, San Diego, CA, USA.

Department of Pharmacy Practice, 15474Midwestern University College of Pharmacy-Glendale, Glendale, AZ, USA.

出版信息

J Intensive Care Med. 2020 Dec;35(12):1434-1438. doi: 10.1177/0885066619828290. Epub 2019 Feb 10.

DOI:10.1177/0885066619828290
PMID:30741072
Abstract

PURPOSE

The objective of this study was to compare the incidence of acute kidney injury (AKI) among critically ill patients receiving combination therapy with vancomycin plus piperacillin-tazobactam (VPT) against patients receiving vancomycin plus cefepime (VC).

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study of adult patients admitted to an intensive care unit between September 2012 and December 2016 was conducted. Patients were included if they received combination therapy with VPT or VC for ≥48 hours. Patients were excluded if creatinine clearance was <60 mL/min or received renal replacement therapy prior to the initiation of therapy. The primary end point was AKI, as defined by the Acute Kidney Injury Network classification, during or within 48 hours of completion of therapy. The incidence of AKI was compared between groups and multivariate analysis was performed to control for relevant confounders.

RESULTS

A total of 394 patients received either VPT (n = 258) or VC (n = 136). There were no differences in baseline serum creatinine (0.8 [0.3]mg/dL vs 0.7 [0.3] mg/dL, = 0.207), use of vasopressors (44% vs 38%, = 0.255), mechanical ventilation (45% vs 40%, = 0.350), or initial vancomycin trough (11.2 [5] mg/L vs 11 [4.8] mg/L, = 0.668) between VPT and VC groups, respectively. The incidence of AKI was 28.7% for VPT patients versus 21.3% for VC patients ( = 0.114). Multivariate analysis revealed vancomycin trough >20 mg/L (odds ratio, OR [95% confidence interval, CI] = 2.69 [1.62-4.47]), baseline SCr (OR [95% CI] = 3.34 [1.43-7.80]), vasopressors (OR [95% CI] = 1.77 [1.04-3.04]), and duration of combination therapy (OR [95% CI] = 1.009 [1.003-1.015]) as independent risk factors for AKI.

CONCLUSION

The risk of AKI was similar between VPT and VC groups in critically ill patients. Risk factors for AKI were related to baseline renal function, duration of combination therapy, supratherapeutic vancomycin troughs, and severity of illness.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在比较接受万古霉素联合哌拉西林他唑巴坦(VPT)与万古霉素联合头孢吡肟(VC)治疗的危重症患者中急性肾损伤(AKI)的发生率。

方法

这是一项对 2012 年 9 月至 2016 年 12 月间入住重症监护病房的成年患者进行的回顾性队列研究。如果患者接受 VPT 或 VC 治疗 ≥48 小时,则将其纳入研究。如果患者肌酐清除率 <60 mL/min 或在开始治疗前接受肾脏替代治疗,则将其排除在外。主要终点是治疗期间或治疗结束后 48 小时内 AKI 的发生,定义为急性肾损伤网络分类。对各组之间 AKI 的发生率进行比较,并进行多变量分析以控制相关混杂因素。

结果

共 394 例患者接受 VPT(n = 258)或 VC(n = 136)治疗。两组间基线血清肌酐(0.8 [0.3]mg/dL vs 0.7 [0.3]mg/dL, = 0.207)、使用血管加压药(44% vs 38%, = 0.255)、机械通气(45% vs 40%, = 0.350)或初始万古霉素谷浓度(11.2 [5]mg/L vs 11 [4.8]mg/L, = 0.668)均无差异。VPT 组 AKI 的发生率为 28.7%,VC 组为 21.3%( = 0.114)。多变量分析显示,万古霉素谷浓度>20mg/L(比值比[95%置信区间] = 2.69 [1.62-4.47])、基线 SCr(比值比[95%置信区间] = 3.34 [1.43-7.80])、血管加压药(比值比[95%置信区间] = 1.77 [1.04-3.04])和联合治疗时间(比值比[95%置信区间] = 1.009 [1.003-1.015])是 AKI 的独立危险因素。

结论

在危重症患者中,VPT 和 VC 组 AKI 的风险相似。AKI 的危险因素与基线肾功能、联合治疗时间、超治疗谷浓度万古霉素和疾病严重程度有关。

相似文献

1
The Risk of Acute Kidney Injury in Critically Ill Patients Receiving Concomitant Vancomycin With Piperacillin-Tazobactam or Cefepime.危重症患者同时接受哌拉西林他唑巴坦或头孢吡肟与万古霉素治疗的急性肾损伤风险。
J Intensive Care Med. 2020 Dec;35(12):1434-1438. doi: 10.1177/0885066619828290. Epub 2019 Feb 10.
2
Risk of Acute Kidney Injury in Patients on Concomitant Vancomycin and Piperacillin-Tazobactam Compared to Those on Vancomycin and Cefepime.万古霉素与哌拉西林他唑巴坦联合治疗与万古霉素与头孢吡肟联合治疗相比患者发生急性肾损伤的风险。
Clin Infect Dis. 2017 Jan 15;64(2):116-123. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciw709. Epub 2016 Oct 20.
3
Comparative Incidence of Acute Kidney Injury in Critically Ill Patients Receiving Vancomycin with Concomitant Piperacillin-Tazobactam or Cefepime: A Retrospective Cohort Study.接受万古霉素联合哌拉西林 - 他唑巴坦或头孢吡肟的重症患者急性肾损伤的比较发病率:一项回顾性队列研究
Pharmacotherapy. 2016 May;36(5):463-71. doi: 10.1002/phar.1738. Epub 2016 Apr 1.
4
Incidence of Acute Kidney Injury in Critically Ill Patients Receiving Vancomycin with Concomitant Piperacillin-Tazobactam, Cefepime, or Meropenem.重症患者同时接受哌拉西林他唑巴坦、头孢吡肟或美罗培南联合万古霉素治疗时急性肾损伤的发生率。
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2019 Apr 25;63(5). doi: 10.1128/AAC.02658-18. Print 2019 May.
5
A retrospective cohort study assessing acute kidney injury and renal recovery among septic patients empirically treated with vancomycin piperacillin-tazobactam versus vancomycin cefepime.一项回顾性队列研究评估了经验性使用万古霉素哌拉西林他唑巴坦与万古霉素头孢吡肟治疗的脓毒症患者的急性肾损伤和肾脏恢复情况。
Intern Emerg Med. 2022 Jan;17(1):91-99. doi: 10.1007/s11739-021-02772-2. Epub 2021 Jun 5.
6
Retrospective Cohort Study of the Incidence of Acute Kidney Injury with Vancomycin Area under the Curve-Based Dosing with Concomitant Piperacillin-Tazobactam Compared to Meropenem or Cefepime.回顾性队列研究:与美罗培南或头孢吡肟相比,基于万古霉素 AUC 的剂量方案联合哌拉西林他唑巴坦治疗时急性肾损伤的发生率。
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2022 Aug 16;66(8):e0004022. doi: 10.1128/aac.00040-22. Epub 2022 Jul 13.
7
Incidence and Risk Factors of Acute Kidney Injury in Patients Receiving Concomitant Vancomycin and Continuous-Infusion Piperacillin/Tazobactam: A Retrospective Cohort Study.同时使用万古霉素和连续输注哌拉西林/他唑巴坦的患者发生急性肾损伤的发生率和危险因素:一项回顾性队列研究。
Ann Pharmacother. 2020 Nov;54(11):1096-1101. doi: 10.1177/1060028020921170. Epub 2020 May 14.
8
Vancomycin with concomitant piperacillin/tazobactam vs. cefepime or meropenem associated acute kidney injury in the critically ill: A multicenter propensity score-matched study.万古霉素联合哌拉西林/他唑巴坦与头孢吡肟或美罗培南相关的危重症患者急性肾损伤:一项多中心倾向评分匹配研究。
J Crit Care. 2022 Feb;67:134-140. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2021.10.018. Epub 2021 Nov 9.
9
Comparative incidence of acute kidney injury in patients on vancomycin therapy in combination with cefepime, piperacillin-tazobactam or meropenem.接受万古霉素联合头孢吡肟、哌拉西林-他唑巴坦或美罗培南治疗的患者急性肾损伤的比较发生率。
J Chemother. 2022 Apr;34(2):103-109. doi: 10.1080/1120009X.2021.1965334. Epub 2021 Aug 23.
10
Comparison of acute kidney injury risk associated with vancomycin and concomitant piperacillin/tazobactam or cefepime in the intensive care unit.比较 ICU 中万古霉素与哌拉西林/他唑巴坦或头孢吡肟联合使用与急性肾损伤风险的关系。
J Crit Care. 2018 Dec;48:32-38. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2018.08.007. Epub 2018 Aug 11.

引用本文的文献

1
Acute Kidney Injury Associated with the Concomitant Use of Vancomycin and Piperacillin-Tazobactam.万古霉素与哌拉西林-他唑巴坦联合使用相关的急性肾损伤
Drug Des Devel Ther. 2025 Sep 9;19:7947-7965. doi: 10.2147/DDDT.S524370. eCollection 2025.
2
Incidence of Acute Kidney Injury in Critically Ill Patients Receiving Vancomycin With Concomitant Piperacillin-Tazobactam Versus Other Beta-Lactams: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.接受万古霉素联合哌拉西林-他唑巴坦与其他β-内酰胺类药物治疗的重症患者急性肾损伤的发生率:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Pharm Technol. 2025 Jul 26:87551225251350894. doi: 10.1177/87551225251350894.
3
Association of Vancomycin Plus Piperacillin-Tazobactam With Acute Kidney Injury: Differentiating Pseudo-Injury From True Nephrotoxicity.
万古霉素联合哌拉西林-他唑巴坦与急性肾损伤的关联:区分假性损伤与真正的肾毒性
Clin Transl Sci. 2025 May;18(5):e70258. doi: 10.1111/cts.70258.
4
Is It Still Beneficial to Monitor the Trough Concentration of Vancomycin? A Quantitative Meta-Analysis of Nephrotoxicity and Efficacy.监测万古霉素谷浓度是否仍有益处?肾毒性和疗效的定量荟萃分析。
Antibiotics (Basel). 2024 May 28;13(6):497. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics13060497.
5
Piperacillin-Tazobactam Versus Anti-Pseudomonal Cephalosporins and Renal and Neurologic Outcomes in Critically Ill Adults: A Secondary Analysis of the SMART Trial.哌拉西林他唑巴坦与抗假单胞菌头孢菌素对重症成人的肾脏和神经系统结局的影响:SMART 试验的二次分析。
J Intensive Care Med. 2023 Dec;38(12):1127-1135. doi: 10.1177/08850666231184177. Epub 2023 Jun 26.
6
Assessment of knowledge, attitude, and practices of acute kidney injury incidence with co-administration of piperacillin/tazobactam and vancomycin among healthcare workers: A cross-sectional study.医护人员中哌拉西林/他唑巴坦与万古霉素联合使用时急性肾损伤发生率的知识、态度和实践评估:一项横断面研究。
Saudi Pharm J. 2023 Jun;31(6):904-910. doi: 10.1016/j.jsps.2023.04.020. Epub 2023 Apr 24.
7
Piperacillin-Tazobactam Plus Vancomycin-Associated Acute Kidney Injury in Adults: Can Teicoplanin or Other Antipseudomonal Beta-Lactams Be Remedies?哌拉西林-他唑巴坦联合万古霉素相关的成人急性肾损伤:替考拉宁或其他抗假单胞菌β-内酰胺类药物能否作为补救措施?
Healthcare (Basel). 2022 Aug 20;10(8):1582. doi: 10.3390/healthcare10081582.
8
A Comparison Between Cefepime and Piperacillin-Tazobactam in the Management of Septic Shock.头孢吡肟与哌拉西林-他唑巴坦治疗感染性休克的比较
Cureus. 2021 Oct 13;13(10):e18742. doi: 10.7759/cureus.18742. eCollection 2021 Oct.
9
Comparison of Adverse Events With Vancomycin Diluted in Normal Saline vs Dextrose 5.万古霉素用生理盐水稀释与用5%葡萄糖稀释的不良事件比较
Fed Pract. 2021 Oct;38(10):468-472. doi: 10.12788/fp.0193.
10
Intravenous magnesium sulfate for prevention of vancomycin plus piperacillin-tazobactam induced acute kidney injury in critically ill patients: An open-label, placebo-controlled, randomized clinical trial.静脉注射硫酸镁预防危重症患者万古霉素联合哌拉西林他唑巴坦引起的急性肾损伤:一项开放标签、安慰剂对照、随机临床试验。
Daru. 2021 Dec;29(2):341-351. doi: 10.1007/s40199-021-00411-x. Epub 2021 Aug 31.