Department of Medical Education, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA.
Department of Geriatrics and Palliative Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA.
J Palliat Med. 2024 Feb;27(2):160-167. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2023.0163. Epub 2023 Sep 12.
End-of-life (EoL) care provided to Americans in urban and rural settings is distinct in terms of both available and delivered services. However, much less is known about which geographic, demographic, and health indicators are associated with disparities in EoL care and how individual versus regional characteristics influence quality of care (QoC). This study aimed to assess how regionality, rurality, and individual socioeconomic factors are associated with QoC in the last month of life (LML). Nationally representative cross-sectional study using the proxy-completed LML questionnaire as part of the National Health and Aging Trends Study (NHATS). The data were linked at the zip code level to geographic and economic indicators. A total of 2778 NHATS enrollees who died from 2012 to 2020. Measurements included population density, socioeconomic indicators, health factors, and health outcomes. The primary independent variable was proxy-reported QoC during the LML (excellent vs. not excellent). In our sample, 52.1% ( = 1447) reported not excellent care and 47.9% ( = 1331) reported excellent care. These populations varied in their demographic and socioeconomic characteristics. After accounting for survey weighting and design, decedents in the top (odds ratio [OR]: 1.58; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.08-2.32) income quartile had significantly greater odds of receiving excellent care than decedents in the bottom quartile. Decedents in zip codes with top quartile health outcome metrics had significantly greater odds of receiving excellent care (OR: 1.64; 95% CI: 1.17-2.29) than decedents in zip codes with bottom quartile health outcomes. County rurality index and county health factors were not correlated with QoC in the LML. High QoC at the EoL may be more associated with individual socioeconomic factors than regional indicators, including degrees of rurality. Clinicians should strive to recognize the interplay of individual characteristics and regional indicators to provide more personalized care.
终末期(EoL)护理在美国城乡地区的服务提供方面存在明显差异。然而,人们对哪些地理、人口统计学和健康指标与 EoL 护理的差异相关,以及个体与区域特征如何影响护理质量(QoC)知之甚少。本研究旨在评估区域、农村和个体社会经济因素与生命最后一个月(LML)的 QoC 之间的关系。这是一项使用代理完成的 LML 问卷的全国代表性横断面研究,该问卷是国家健康老龄化趋势研究(NHATS)的一部分。数据在邮政编码一级与地理和经济指标相关联。共有 2778 名 NHATS 参与者于 2012 年至 2020 年期间死亡。测量包括人口密度、社会经济指标、健康因素和健康结果。主要的独立变量是代理报告的 LML 期间的 QoC(优秀与不优秀)。在我们的样本中,52.1%(=1447)报告了不优秀的护理,47.9%(=1331)报告了优秀的护理。这些人群在人口统计学和社会经济特征上存在差异。在考虑调查权重和设计后,收入最高(优势比[OR]:1.58;95%置信区间[CI]:1.08-2.32)四分位数的死者接受优秀护理的可能性明显高于收入最低四分位数的死者。邮政编码健康结果指标最高四分位数的死者接受优秀护理的可能性明显高于邮政编码健康结果最低四分位数的死者(OR:1.64;95%CI:1.17-2.29)。县农村性指数和县健康因素与 LML 中的 QoC 无关。EoL 时的高 QoC 可能与个体社会经济因素的关系更密切,而不是与区域指标,包括农村程度有关。临床医生应努力认识到个体特征和区域指标的相互作用,以提供更个性化的护理。