Stress Research Institute, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden; Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Division of Psychology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Division of Psychology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Brain Behav Immun. 2019 Jul;79:236-243. doi: 10.1016/j.bbi.2019.02.006. Epub 2019 Feb 8.
There is strong experimental support that infections increase the drive for sleep in animals, and it is widely believed that more sleep is part of an adaptive immune response. While respiratory infections (RI) are very prevalent in humans, there is a striking lack of systematic knowledge on how it affects sleep. We recruited 100 people, among whom 28 became sick with an RI during the study period (fulfilling criteria for influenza-like illness, ILI, or acute respiratory infection, ARI). We measured sick participants' sleep at home, both objectively (actigraphy) and subjectively (diary ratings), for one week as well as four weeks later when healthy. During the week with RI, people spent objectively longer time in bed and had a longer total sleep time compared to the healthy week. During the infection, participants also had more awakenings, but no significant differences in sleep latency or sleep efficiency. While sick, people also reported increased difficulties falling asleep, worse sleep quality, more restless sleep and more shallow sleep, while they did not report sleep to be less sufficient. Most problems occurred at the beginning of the sickness week, when symptoms were strong, and showed signs of recovery thereafter (as indicated by interactions between condition and day/night of data collection for all the 10 sleep outcomes). The degree of symptoms of RI was related to a worse sleep quality and more restless sleep, but not to any of the objective sleep outcomes or the other subjective sleep variables. Having a higher body temperature was not significantly related to any of the sleep variables. This study suggests that having a respiratory infection is associated with spending more time in bed and sleeping longer, but also with more disturbed sleep, both objectively and subjectively. This novel study should be seen as being of pilot character. There is a need for larger studies which classify pathogen type and include baseline predictors, or that manipulate sleep, in order to understand whether the sleep alterations seen during infections are adaptive and whether sleep interventions could be used to improve recovery from respiratory infections.
有强有力的实验证据表明,感染会增加动物的睡眠驱动力,人们普遍认为,更多的睡眠是适应性免疫反应的一部分。虽然呼吸道感染(RI)在人类中非常普遍,但对于它如何影响睡眠,人们知之甚少。我们招募了 100 人,其中 28 人在研究期间患上了呼吸道感染(符合流感样疾病或急性呼吸道感染的标准)。我们在家中使用客观(活动记录仪)和主观(日记评分)方法测量了生病参与者的睡眠,持续一周,然后在四周后他们健康时再次测量。在呼吸道感染期间,与健康周相比,参与者在床上的客观时间更长,总睡眠时间更长。在感染期间,参与者的觉醒次数也更多,但入睡潜伏期和睡眠效率没有显著差异。生病时,人们还报告入睡困难增加、睡眠质量更差、睡眠不安稳更多、睡眠更浅,尽管他们并不觉得睡眠不足。大多数问题出现在疾病开始的第一周,此时症状严重,此后有迹象表明开始恢复(所有 10 项睡眠结果的条件与数据采集的日夜交互作用表明了这一点)。呼吸道感染的症状严重程度与睡眠质量更差和睡眠不安稳有关,但与任何客观睡眠结果或其他主观睡眠变量无关。体温升高与任何睡眠变量均无显著相关性。这项研究表明,患呼吸道感染与在床上花费更多时间和睡眠时间延长有关,但也与客观和主观上睡眠更不安稳有关。这项新研究应被视为具有初步性质。需要进行更大规模的研究,这些研究应分类病原体类型并纳入基线预测因子,或操纵睡眠,以了解感染期间观察到的睡眠改变是否具有适应性,以及睡眠干预是否可用于改善呼吸道感染的恢复。