Blomquist C L, Greene I D
California Department of Food and Agriculture, Sacramento 95832.
Golden State Bulb Growers, Watsonville, CA 95077.
Plant Dis. 2011 Feb;95(2):224. doi: 10.1094/PDIS-09-10-0682.
Pineapple lily (Eucomis vandermerwei) is grown for its exotic-looking flower spike that looks like a small pineapple. It is used as an accent plant in the garden or for its long-lasting cut flowers. In late November 2007, plant foliage was submitted to the California State Diagnostic Laboratory by a commercial grower for phytosanitary inspection before shipment of bulbs to Europe. Leaves had wet, brown, elliptical spots of 1 to 2 cm long, some with yellow halos. The interior of the older spots was pale brown and papery. Conidiophores typical of Botrytis spp. were observed on the abaxial side of the leaf in the interior of the older spots. Isolations on half-strength acidified potato dextrose agar (APDA) yielded a grayish mycelium with conidiophores developing on the plant tissue only. The agar was grayish yellow, especially when viewed from the underside. Conidiophores measured 275 to 650 μm × 15 to 20 μm (411.2 × 15.5 μm average). Conidia were light brown, subglobose to broadly ellipsoidal, and measuring 10 to 15 × 13 to 20 μm (11.8 × 16.2 μm average). Scattered, black sclerotia measuring 335 to 1,007 × 518 to 1,079 μm (668.9 × 743.9 μm average) formed on the medium after approximately 7 days. Pathogenicity was confirmed by inoculating four Eucomis spp. plants with one inoculation per leaf, four leaves per plant. Each leaf was wounded with a sterile pushpin and three agar plugs from 4-day-old cultures were placed in a plastic screw-cap lid filled with sterile water and clipped onto each wound. Plants were misted with water, covered with a plastic bag, and placed in a growth chamber at 16°C (12-h photoperiod) for 48 h after which the agar plugs and caps were removed. An equal number of plants were wounded and mock inoculated with APDA. Pathogenicity experiments were repeated. After 14 days, all inoculated leaves had lesions and the fungus was reisolated. No Botrytis spp. were isolated from the mock-inoculated plants. Our sequence of the intergenic spacer regions of one isolate, GenBank FJ10809, matched Botrytis hyacinthi sequence AJ716297 with 99.8% identity. Using molecular (3) and morphological characters (1,4), the pathogen was identified as B. hyacinthi, the cause of fire disease in hyacinths. This pathogen was described previously on hyacinths in Washington State (2), the Netherlands (4), and the United Kingdom (2). The importance and economic impact of this disease appears to be limited because it has only been observed on mature or senescing foliage and not bulbs. To our knowledge, this is the first report of B. hyacinthi causing a leaf spot on pineapple lily. References: (1) C. J. Gould et al. Plant Dis. Rep. 42:534, 1958. (2) W. C. Moore. Page 14 in: Diseases of Bulbs. Bull. No. 117. Minist. Agric. Fish. London, 1939. (3) M. Staats et al. Mol. Biol. Evol. 22:333, 2005. (4) J. Westerdijk and F. H. Van Beyma Thoe Kingma. Meded. Phytopathol. Lab. "Willie Commelin Scholten" 12:15, 1928.
菠萝百合(Eucomis vandermerwei)因其形似小菠萝的奇异花穗而被种植。它被用作花园中的点缀植物或因其切花花期长而被用于切花。2007年11月下旬,一位商业种植者在将种球运往欧洲之前,将植株叶片提交给加利福尼亚州诊断实验室进行植物检疫检查。叶片上有湿润的、褐色的、长1至2厘米的椭圆形斑点,有些带有黄色晕圈。较老斑点的内部呈浅褐色且纸质。在较老斑点内部的叶片背面观察到典型的葡萄孢属分生孢子梗。在半强度酸化马铃薯葡萄糖琼脂(APDA)上进行分离培养,产生了灰白色菌丝体,分生孢子梗仅在植物组织上发育。琼脂呈灰黄色,尤其是从底部观察时。分生孢子梗长275至650微米×宽15至20微米(平均411.2×15.5微米)。分生孢子浅褐色,近球形至宽椭圆形,大小为10至15×13至20微米(平均11.8×16.2微米)。大约7天后,在培养基上形成了分散的黑色菌核,大小为335至1007×518至1079微米(平均668.9×743.9微米)。通过对四种菠萝百合属植物进行接种来确认致病性,每株植物接种四片叶子,每片叶子接种一次。每片叶子用无菌大头针划伤,将来自4天龄培养物的三个琼脂块放入装有无菌水的塑料螺帽盖中,并夹在每个伤口上。给植物喷水,用塑料袋覆盖,并在16°C(12小时光周期)的生长室中放置48小时,之后取出琼脂块和盖子。对同等数量的植物进行划伤并接种APDA作为对照。致病性实验重复进行。14天后,所有接种的叶片都出现了病斑,并且重新分离出了真菌。对照接种的植物未分离出葡萄孢属真菌。我们对一个分离株的基因间隔区序列(GenBank FJ10809)与风信子葡萄孢序列AJ716297的同一性为99.8%。利用分子特征(3)和形态特征(1,4),该病原菌被鉴定为风信子葡萄孢,它是风信子火疫病的病原菌。此前在华盛顿州(2)、荷兰(4)和英国(2)的风信子上已描述过这种病原菌。这种病害的重要性和经济影响似乎有限,因为它仅在成熟或衰老的叶片上观察到,而未在种球上观察到。据我们所知,这是风信子葡萄孢引起菠萝百合叶斑病的首次报道。参考文献:(1)C. J. Gould等人,《植物病害报告》42:534,1958年。(2)W. C. Moore,《球根病害》,第14页,农业部渔业部通报第117号,伦敦,1939年。(3)M. Staats等人,《分子生物学与进化》22:333,2005年。(4)J. Westerdijk和F. H. Van Beyma Thoe Kingma,《植物病理学实验室“威利·科梅林·斯科尔滕”通报》12:15,1928年。