Applied Physics Section of the Environmental Science Department, University of Lleida, Jaume II 69, 25001 Lleida, Spain.
Centre for Sustainable Technologies, Belfast School of Architecture and the Built Environment, Ulster University, Newtownabbey BT370QB, Northern Ireland, UK.
Sci Total Environ. 2019 Apr 10;660:1576-1592. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.12.461. Epub 2019 Jan 4.
Building-Integrated Photovoltaic/Thermal (BIPVT) technology offers multiple advantages; however, these types of installations include materials such as Photovoltaic (PV) cells and metals which considerably influence BIPVT environmental impact. Therefore, there is a need to evaluate BIPVT environmental profile, for instance by means of Life Cycle Assessment (LCA). In light of the issues mentioned above, the present article is an LCA study that assesses the environmental performance of a BIPVT prototype that has been developed and patented at the Ulster University (Belfast, UK). The investigation places emphasis on material manufacturing, based on Cumulative Energy Demand (CED), Global Warming Potential (GWP), ReCiPe, Ecological footprint and USEtox. The results show that according to all the adopted methods/environmental indicators and based on primary materials, the PV cells and the two vessels (steel) are the components with the three highest impacts. Scenarios which include recycling of steel, plastics and brass (landfill for the other materials has been assumed), based on CED, GWP 100a and ReCiPe endpoint, have been examined. It was found that steel recycling offers a considerable impact reduction, ranging from 47% to 85%. Furthermore, the impact of the proposed BIPVT module per m of thermal absorber has been calculated. The results, based on primary materials, show 4.92 GJ/m and 0.34 t CO/m (GWP 100a). In addition, according to USEtox/ecotoxicity, USEtox/human toxicity-non-cancer (scenario based on primary materials), the PV cells present the highest contributions to the total impact of the module: 55% in terms of ecotoxicity and 86% concerning human toxicity/non-cancer. A comparison with literature is provided. Moreover, a separate section of the article is about factors which influence BIPVT environmental profile, discussing parameters such as the storage materials and the end-of-life management.
光伏光热一体化(BIPVT)技术具有多种优势;然而,这些类型的装置包含光伏(PV)电池和金属等材料,这些材料对 BIPVT 的环境影响很大。因此,需要评估 BIPVT 的环境状况,例如通过生命周期评估(LCA)。鉴于上述问题,本文是对在阿尔斯特大学(英国贝尔法斯特)开发和获得专利的 BIPVT 原型进行的 LCA 研究。该研究基于累积能源需求(CED)、全球变暖潜能值(GWP)、ReCiPe、生态足迹和 USEtox,重点研究材料制造。结果表明,根据所有采用的方法/环境指标和基于主要材料,光伏电池和两个容器(钢)是影响最大的三个组件。已经研究了基于 CED、GWP100a 和 ReCiPe 终点的包括钢、塑料和黄铜(其他材料假设为垃圾填埋场)回收的情景。结果发现,钢的回收利用可带来相当大的影响减少,范围从 47%到 85%。此外,还计算了所提出的 BIPVT 模块每平方米热吸收器的影响。基于主要材料的结果表明,GWP100a 为 4.92 GJ/m,0.34 t CO/m。此外,根据 USEtox/生态毒性、USEtox/非癌症人类毒性(基于主要材料的情景),光伏电池对模块总影响的贡献最大:在生态毒性方面为 55%,在非癌症人类毒性方面为 86%。提供了与文献的比较。此外,文章的一个单独部分是关于影响 BIPVT 环境状况的因素,讨论了存储材料和使用寿命结束管理等参数。