College of Engineering, IT & Environment, Charles Darwin University, Ellengowan Drive, Casuarina, NT, 0810, Australia.
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2020 Aug;27(23):29075-29090. doi: 10.1007/s11356-020-09194-1. Epub 2020 May 18.
The present article focuses on a cradle-to-grave life cycle assessment (LCA) of the most widely adopted solar photovoltaic power generation technologies, viz., mono-crystalline silicon (mono-Si), multi-crystalline silicon (multi-Si), amorphous silicon (a-Si) and cadmium telluride (CdTe) energy technologies, based on ReCiPe life cycle impact assessment method. LCA is the most powerful environmental impact assessment tool from a product perspective and ReCiPe is one of the most advanced LCA methodologies with the broadest set of mid-point impact categories. More importantly, ReCiPe combines the strengths of both mid-point-based life cycle impact assessment approach of CML-IA, and end-point-based approach of Eco-indicator 99 methods. Accordingly, the LCA results of all four solar PV technologies have been evaluated and compared based on 18 mid-point impact indicators (viz., climate change, ozone depletion, terrestrial acidification, freshwater eutrophication, marine eutrophication, human toxicity, photochemical oxidant formation, particulate matter formation, terrestrial ecotoxicity, freshwater ecotoxicity, marine ecotoxicity, ionising radiation, agricultural land occupation, urban land occupation, natural land transformation, water depletion, metal depletion and fossil depletion), 3 end-point/damage indicators (viz., human health, ecosystems and cost increases in resource extraction) and a unified single score. The overall study has been conducted based on hierarchist perspective and according to the relevant ISO standards. Final results show that the CdTe thin-film solar plant carries the least environmental life cycle impact within the four PV technologies, sequentially followed by multi-Si, a-Si and mono-Si technology.
本文主要采用 ReCiPe 生命周期影响评价方法,对最广泛采用的太阳能光伏(PV)发电技术,即单晶硅(mono-Si)、多晶硅(multi-Si)、非晶硅(a-Si)和碲化镉(CdTe)能源技术进行了从摇篮到坟墓的生命周期评估(LCA)。LCA 是从产品角度来看最强大的环境影响评估工具,而 ReCiPe 是最先进的 LCA 方法之一,具有最广泛的中点影响类别。更重要的是,ReCiPe 结合了 CML-IA 中点为基础的生命周期影响评估方法和 Eco-indicator 99 方法的终点为基础的方法的优势。因此,根据 18 个中点影响指标(即气候变化、臭氧消耗、陆地酸化、淡水富营养化、海洋富营养化、人类毒性、光化学氧化剂形成、颗粒物形成、陆地生态毒性、淡水生态毒性、海洋生态毒性、电离辐射、农业用地占用、城市土地占用、自然土地转化、水资源枯竭、金属枯竭和化石枯竭)、3 个终点/损害指标(即人类健康、生态系统和资源开采成本增加)和统一的单一分数,对所有四种太阳能光伏技术的 LCA 结果进行了评估和比较。整个研究基于层次主义的观点,并按照相关的 ISO 标准进行。最终结果表明,碲化镉薄膜太阳能电站在这四种光伏技术中对环境的生命周期影响最小,其次是多晶硅、非晶硅和单晶硅技术。