• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

R-TPI:滚动毒性概率区间设计,用于缩短I期试验的持续时间并维持其安全性。

R-TPI: rolling toxicity probability interval design to shorten the duration and maintain safety of phase I trials.

作者信息

Guo Wentian, Ji Yuan, Li Daniel

机构信息

a Laiya Consulting, Inc ., Wilmette , Illinois , USA.

b Research Institute , NorthShore University HealthSystem , Evanston , Illinois , USA.

出版信息

J Biopharm Stat. 2019;29(3):411-424. doi: 10.1080/10543406.2019.1577683. Epub 2019 Feb 11.

DOI:10.1080/10543406.2019.1577683
PMID:30744484
Abstract

To shorten trial duration and improve safety of Phase I trials, we propose R-TPI, a rolling enrollment design that combines the features in model-based designs such as mTPI-2 and rule-based designs such as rolling six. R-TPI employs a novel rolling enrollment scheme, which allows concurrent patient enrollment that is faster than cohort-based enrollment. Bench-marking against rolling six, we find that the R-TPI design is as fast in completing clinical trials but with fewer toxicity events and higher chance of finding the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) in the single scenario laid out in the 2008 rolling six publication. We also find that in a broad setting involving multiple scenarios, R-TPI is generally faster, safer, and more reliable than standard designs. R-TPI is a general design that can be applied to adult and pediatric Phase I trials. It reduces the length of trial duration, leads to safer trials with fewer toxicity events, and maintains relatively a high chance of identifying the MTD.

摘要

为缩短Ⅰ期试验的持续时间并提高其安全性,我们提出了R-TPI,这是一种滚动入组设计,它结合了基于模型的设计(如mTPI-2)和基于规则的设计(如滚动六法)的特点。R-TPI采用了一种新颖的滚动入组方案,该方案允许并行患者入组,其速度比基于队列的入组更快。与滚动六法进行基准对比,我们发现R-TPI设计在完成临床试验方面同样迅速,但在2008年滚动六法出版物中列出的单一情况下,毒性事件更少,找到最大耐受剂量(MTD)的几率更高。我们还发现,在涉及多种情况的广泛背景下,R-TPI通常比标准设计更快、更安全且更可靠。R-TPI是一种通用设计,可应用于成人和儿科Ⅰ期试验。它缩短了试验持续时间,使试验更安全,毒性事件更少,并保持了相对较高的识别MTD的几率。

相似文献

1
R-TPI: rolling toxicity probability interval design to shorten the duration and maintain safety of phase I trials.R-TPI:滚动毒性概率区间设计,用于缩短I期试验的持续时间并维持其安全性。
J Biopharm Stat. 2019;29(3):411-424. doi: 10.1080/10543406.2019.1577683. Epub 2019 Feb 11.
2
An adaptive multi-stage phase I dose-finding design incorporating continuous efficacy and toxicity data from multiple treatment cycles.一种适应性多阶段I期剂量探索设计,纳入了来自多个治疗周期的连续疗效和毒性数据。
J Biopharm Stat. 2019;29(2):271-286. doi: 10.1080/10543406.2018.1535497. Epub 2018 Nov 7.
3
Modified toxicity probability interval design: a safer and more reliable method than the 3 + 3 design for practical phase I trials.改良毒性概率区间设计:比 3+3 设计更安全、更可靠的实用 I 期临床试验方法。
J Clin Oncol. 2013 May 10;31(14):1785-91. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2012.45.7903. Epub 2013 Apr 8.
4
A modified toxicity probability interval method for dose-finding trials.改良毒性概率区间法在探索性剂量试验中的应用。
Clin Trials. 2010 Dec;7(6):653-63. doi: 10.1177/1740774510382799. Epub 2010 Oct 8.
5
A Bayesian interval dose-finding design addressingOckham's razor: mTPI-2.一种解决奥卡姆剃刀问题的贝叶斯区间剂量探索设计:mTPI-2。
Contemp Clin Trials. 2017 Jul;58:23-33. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2017.04.006. Epub 2017 Apr 27.
6
A simulation-based comparison of the traditional method, Rolling-6 design and a frequentist version of the continual reassessment method with special attention to trial duration in pediatric Phase I oncology trials.基于模拟的传统方法、Rolling-6 设计和频繁主义版连续评估方法的比较,特别关注儿科 I 期肿瘤试验中的试验持续时间。
Contemp Clin Trials. 2010 May;31(3):259-70. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2010.03.006. Epub 2010 Mar 15.
7
A comparison of phase I dose-finding designs in clinical trials with monotonicity assumption violation.违反单调假设的临床试验中 I 期剂量发现设计的比较。
Clin Trials. 2020 Oct;17(5):522-534. doi: 10.1177/1740774520932130. Epub 2020 Jul 7.
8
Three-dose-cohort designs in cancer phase I trials.癌症I期试验中的三剂量队列设计。
Stat Med. 2008 May 30;27(12):2070-93. doi: 10.1002/sim.3054.
9
Performance of toxicity probability interval based designs in contrast to the continual reassessment method.基于毒性概率区间的设计与连续重新评估方法的性能对比。
Stat Med. 2017 Jan 30;36(2):291-300. doi: 10.1002/sim.7043. Epub 2016 Jul 19.
10
Small-sample behavior of novel phase I cancer trial designs.新型 I 期癌症试验设计的小样本行为。
Clin Trials. 2013 Feb;10(1):63-80. doi: 10.1177/1740774512469311.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparison Between Simultaneous and Sequential Utilization of Safety and Efficacy for Optimal Dose Determination in Bayesian Model-Assisted Designs.贝叶斯模型辅助设计中为最优剂量确定同时利用安全性和疗效与序贯利用安全性和疗效的比较。
Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2023 Jul;57(4):728-736. doi: 10.1007/s43441-023-00517-1. Epub 2023 Apr 22.
2
Dose finding studies for therapies with late-onset toxicities: A comparison study of designs.晚期毒性治疗的剂量发现研究:设计比较研究。
Stat Med. 2022 Dec 30;41(30):5767-5788. doi: 10.1002/sim.9593. Epub 2022 Oct 17.