Du Yu, Yin Jun, Sargent Daniel J, Mandrekar Sumithra J
a Department of Biostatistics , Johns Hopkins University , Baltimore , MD , USA.
b Cancer Center Statistics , Mayo Clinic , Rochester , MN , USA.
J Biopharm Stat. 2019;29(2):271-286. doi: 10.1080/10543406.2018.1535497. Epub 2018 Nov 7.
Phase I designs traditionally use the dose-limiting toxicity (DLT), a binary endpoint from the first treatment cycle, to identify the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) assuming a monotonically increasing relationship between dose and efficacy. In this article, we establish a general framework for a multi-stage adaptive design where we jointly model a continuous efficacy outcome and continuous/quasi-continuous toxicity endpoints from multiple treatment cycles. The normalized Total Toxicity Profile (nTTP) is used as an illustration for quasi-continuous toxicity endpoints, and we replace DLT with nTTP to take into account multiple grades and types of toxicities. In addition, the proposed design accommodates non-monotone dose-efficacy relationships, and longitudinal toxicity data in effort to capture the adverse events from multiple cycles. Stage 1 of our design uses toxicity data to perform dose-escalation and identify a set of initially allowable (safe) doses; stage 2 of our design incorporates an efficacy outcome to update the set of allowable doses for each new cohort and randomizes the new cohort of patients to the allowable doses with emphasis towards those with higher predicted efficacy. Stage 3 uses all data from all treated patients at the end of the trial to make final recommendations. Simulations showed that the design had a high probability of making the correct dose selection and good overdose control across various dose-efficacy and dose-toxicity scenarios. In addition, the proposed design allows for early termination when all doses are too toxic. To our best knowledge, the proposed dual-endpoint dose-finding design is the first such study to incorporate multiple cycles of toxicities and a continuous efficacy outcome.
传统的I期设计使用剂量限制毒性(DLT),这是来自第一个治疗周期的二元终点,假设剂量与疗效之间存在单调递增关系来确定最大耐受剂量(MTD)。在本文中,我们建立了一个多阶段自适应设计的通用框架,其中我们联合对来自多个治疗周期的连续疗效结果和连续/准连续毒性终点进行建模。标准化总毒性概况(nTTP)用作准连续毒性终点的示例,并且我们用nTTP代替DLT以考虑多种毒性等级和类型。此外,所提出的设计适应非单调的剂量-疗效关系以及纵向毒性数据,以努力捕捉多个周期的不良事件。我们设计的第1阶段使用毒性数据进行剂量递增并确定一组初始允许(安全)剂量;我们设计的第2阶段纳入疗效结果以更新每个新队列的允许剂量集,并将新队列的患者随机分配到允许剂量,重点是那些预测疗效较高的剂量。第3阶段在试验结束时使用所有接受治疗患者的所有数据来做出最终建议。模拟表明,该设计在各种剂量-疗效和剂量-毒性情况下具有做出正确剂量选择的高概率和良好的过量控制。此外,所提出的设计允许在所有剂量毒性过大时提前终止。据我们所知,所提出的双终点剂量探索设计是第一项纳入多个毒性周期和连续疗效结果的此类研究。