Suppr超能文献

直肠癌手术中肠系膜淋巴结转移与动脉结扎水平的关系定位。

Localization of mesenteric lymph node metastases in relation to the level of arterial ligation in rectal cancer surgery.

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Västmanland Hospital Västerås, Västerås, Sweden; Centre for Clinical Research Västerås, Uppsala University, Västmanland Hospital Västerås, Sweden.

Department of Pathology, Västmanland Hospital Västerås, Västerås, Sweden.

出版信息

Eur J Surg Oncol. 2019 Jun;45(6):989-994. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2019.01.183. Epub 2019 Feb 5.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

For oncological reasons, central arterial ligation of the inferior mesenteric artery (IMA) is suggested in rectal cancer surgery although no conclusive evidence support this. We have therefore investigated the localization of lymph node metastases and compared central ligation of the IMA versus peripheral arterial ligation, in rectal cancer specimens.

METHODS

This was a cross-sectional population-based study of consecutive recruited patients who underwent resection for rectal cancer in 2012-2015. Multiple linear regression analysis was used to explore the relationship between lymph node count and age, sex, body mass index, preoperative oncological treatment, type of surgery, tumour stage, and vessel and specimen length.

RESULTS

151 patients (54 women) were included, with median (range) age 70 (45-87) years. The median (range) number of lymph nodes retrieved was 25 (3-70), which was associated with body mass index, type of surgery and vessel length. Vessel length, median (range) 9.6 (5-14) and 9.2 (5-15) cm for reported central and peripheral arterial ligation, respectively, was associated with body mass index. In 39 of 42 samples, metastatic lymph nodes were located in the mesorectum, and 13 of 42 samples also had metastatic lymph nodes in the sigmoid mesentery. None were found around the ligated artery.

CONCLUSION

To recruit all metastatic lymph nodes in rectal cancer surgery, it is important to include the sigmoid mesentery in the specimen, but not to perform a central ligation of the IMA compared with ligation of the SRA close to the left colic artery (LCA).

摘要

介绍

出于肿瘤学原因,在直肠癌手术中建议结扎肠系膜下动脉(IMA)的中央动脉,尽管没有确凿的证据支持这一点。因此,我们研究了淋巴结转移的定位,并比较了直肠癌标本中IMA 的中央结扎与 SRA 结扎的效果。

方法

这是一项连续招募的 2012-2015 年接受直肠癌切除术的患者的横断面基于人群的研究。使用多元线性回归分析来探讨淋巴结计数与年龄、性别、体重指数、术前肿瘤治疗、手术类型、肿瘤分期以及血管和标本长度之间的关系。

结果

纳入 151 例患者(54 例女性),中位(范围)年龄为 70 岁(45-87 岁)。中位(范围)淋巴结检出数为 25 个(3-70 个),与体重指数、手术类型和血管长度有关。血管长度,分别报告的中央和外周动脉结扎的中位(范围)值为 9.6(5-14)和 9.2(5-15)cm,与体重指数有关。在 42 个样本中的 39 个中,转移的淋巴结位于直肠系膜中,在 42 个样本中的 13 个中,也有转移的淋巴结位于乙状结肠系膜中。在结扎动脉周围未发现淋巴结。

结论

为了在直肠癌手术中招募所有转移的淋巴结,重要的是要将乙状结肠系膜包含在标本中,但与结扎靠近左结肠动脉(LCA)的 SRA 相比,不需要进行IMA 的中央结扎。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验