Wang Chentong, Lin Guole, Jia Wenzhuo, Wu Aiwen, Han Jiagang, Liu Qian, Yao Hongwei, Li Ganbin, An Yang, Zhou Jiaolin
Department of General Surgery, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100730, China.
Department of General Surgery, Beijing Hospital, National Center of Gerontology, Beijing, China.
Tech Coloproctol. 2024 Dec 10;29(1):13. doi: 10.1007/s10151-024-03052-9.
There is currently limited research on the optimal level of inferior mesenteric artery (IMA) ligation during surgery for patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) undergoing neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT). We carried out a retrospective cohort study to analyze the impact of IMA ligation level on surgical outcomes and long-term patient prognosis.
The data originated from a multicenter randomized controlled trial conducted across six tertiary referral hospitals in Beijing, involving patients with LARC undergoing nCRT followed by radical surgery. Patients were divided into high ligation (HL) and low ligation (LL) groups on the basis of the ligation level of IMA. Evaluation parameters included surgical outcomes, complications, long-term survival, and quality of life questionnaires.
From August 2017 to April 2022, a total of 337 patients were included in the analysis. The number of lymph nodes retrieved was higher in the LL group compared with the HL group. Patients in both groups experienced a significant decrease in quality-of-life scores, but no difference in the extent of this decline was observed between the two groups. There were no significant differences between the two groups in terms of operation time, intraoperative blood loss, and other factors. There was also no significant difference in DFS (p = 0.818) and OS (p = 0.945) between the two groups.
For patients with LARC undergoing nCRT, the level of IMA ligation during radical surgery does not significantly impact complications or long-term prognosis. The selection of ligation pattern should be on the basis of a comprehensive assessment of factors including metastatic risk, vascular anatomy, comorbidity (such as atherosclerosis), and surgical skills of the surgeons.
目前,对于接受新辅助放化疗(nCRT)的局部晚期直肠癌(LARC)患者手术中肠系膜下动脉(IMA)结扎的最佳水平研究有限。我们进行了一项回顾性队列研究,以分析IMA结扎水平对手术结果和患者长期预后的影响。
数据来源于在北京六家三级转诊医院进行的一项多中心随机对照试验,涉及接受nCRT后行根治性手术的LARC患者。根据IMA结扎水平将患者分为高位结扎(HL)组和低位结扎(LL)组。评估参数包括手术结果、并发症、长期生存率和生活质量问卷。
2017年8月至2022年4月,共有337例患者纳入分析。LL组的淋巴结清扫数量高于HL组。两组患者的生活质量评分均显著下降,但两组之间下降程度无差异。两组在手术时间、术中出血量和其他因素方面无显著差异。两组的无病生存期(DFS,p = 0.818)和总生存期(OS,p = 0.945)也无显著差异。
对于接受nCRT的LARC患者,根治性手术中IMA结扎水平对并发症或长期预后无显著影响。结扎方式的选择应基于对转移风险、血管解剖、合并症(如动脉粥样硬化)和外科医生手术技能等因素的综合评估。