• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Researching the Appropriateness of Care in the Complementary and Integrative Health Professions: Part I.补充与整合健康职业中医疗适宜性的研究:第一部分。
J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2018 Nov-Dec;41(9):800-806. doi: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2018.11.002. Epub 2019 Feb 10.
2
Measuring the Appropriateness of Spinal Manipulation for Chronic Low Back and Chronic Neck Pain in Chiropractic Patients.测量脊骨按摩对脊医慢性下背痛和慢性颈痛患者的适宜性。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2021 Oct 1;46(19):1344-1353. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000004009.
3
Researching the Appropriateness of Care in the Complementary and Integrative Health Professions Part 5: Using Patient Records: Selection, Protection, and Abstraction.补充与整合健康职业中医疗适宜性的研究 第5部分:使用患者记录:选择、保护与提取
J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2019 Jun;42(5):327-334. doi: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2019.02.008. Epub 2019 Jun 27.
4
Researching the Appropriateness of Care in the Complementary and Integrative Health Professions Part 4: Putting Practice Back Into Evidence-based Practice by Recruiting Clinics and Patients.补充与整合健康职业中医疗适宜性的研究 第4部分:通过招募诊所和患者将实践回归循证实践
J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2019 Jun;42(5):319-326. doi: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2019.02.007. Epub 2019 Jun 18.
5
Development of a Clinical Decision Aid for Chiropractic Management of Common Conditions Causing Low Back Pain in Veterans: Results of a Consensus Process.退伍军人常见下腰痛病因的整脊治疗临床决策辅助工具的开发:共识过程的结果
J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2019 Nov;42(9):677-693. doi: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2019.03.009. Epub 2019 Dec 19.
6
Researching the Appropriateness of Care in the Complementary and Integrative Health Professions Part 3: Designing Instruments With Patient Input.补充与整合健康职业中医疗适宜性的研究 第3部分:在患者参与下设计工具
J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2019 Jun;42(5):307-318. doi: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2019.02.006. Epub 2019 Jun 27.
7
Best Practices for Chiropractic Management of Patients with Chronic Musculoskeletal Pain: A Clinical Practice Guideline.脊椎治疗慢性肌肉骨骼疼痛管理的最佳实践:临床实践指南。
J Altern Complement Med. 2020 Oct;26(10):884-901. doi: 10.1089/acm.2020.0181. Epub 2020 Jul 30.
8
Best Practices for Chiropractic Care for Older Adults: A Systematic Review and Consensus Update.老年人整脊治疗的最佳实践:系统评价与共识更新
J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2017 May;40(4):217-229. doi: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2017.02.001. Epub 2017 Mar 14.
9
The impact of patient preferences and costs on the appropriateness of spinal manipulation and mobilization for chronic low back pain and chronic neck pain.患者偏好和成本对慢性下背痛和慢性颈痛的脊柱推拿和松动治疗适宜性的影响。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2019 Nov 7;20(1):519. doi: 10.1186/s12891-019-2904-6.
10
Chiropractic.整脊疗法
Prim Care. 2002 Jun;29(2):419-37. doi: 10.1016/s0095-4543(01)00005-7.

引用本文的文献

1
Measuring the Appropriateness of Spinal Manipulation for Chronic Low Back and Chronic Neck Pain in Chiropractic Patients.测量脊骨按摩对脊医慢性下背痛和慢性颈痛患者的适宜性。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2021 Oct 1;46(19):1344-1353. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000004009.
2
Visit Frequency and Outcomes for Patients Using Ongoing Chiropractic Care for Chronic Low-Back and Neck Pain: An Observational Longitudinal Study.持续性脊椎按摩疗法治疗慢性下背痛和颈痛患者的就诊频率和结局:一项观察性纵向研究。
Pain Physician. 2021 Jan;24(1):E61-E74.
3
A protocol for chronic pain outcome measurement enhancement by linking PROMIS-29 scale to legacy measures and improving chronic pain stratification.一项通过将患者报告结果测量信息系统-29量表与传统测量方法相联系并改善慢性疼痛分层来增强慢性疼痛结果测量的方案。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2020 Oct 10;21(1):671. doi: 10.1186/s12891-020-03696-2.
4
Predictors of visit frequency for patients using ongoing chiropractic care for chronic low back and chronic neck pain; analysis of observational data.使用持续整脊治疗慢性下腰痛和慢性颈痛的患者就诊频率的预测因素;观察数据分析。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2020 May 13;21(1):298. doi: 10.1186/s12891-020-03330-1.
5
Coping and Management Techniques Used by Chronic Low Back Pain Patients Receiving Treatment From Chiropractors.接受脊椎按摩治疗的慢性腰痛患者所采用的应对和管理技巧。
J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2019 Oct;42(8):582-593. doi: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2019.07.002. Epub 2019 Nov 23.
6
The impact of patient preferences and costs on the appropriateness of spinal manipulation and mobilization for chronic low back pain and chronic neck pain.患者偏好和成本对慢性下背痛和慢性颈痛的脊柱推拿和松动治疗适宜性的影响。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2019 Nov 7;20(1):519. doi: 10.1186/s12891-019-2904-6.
7
Prevalence and Characteristics of Chronic Spinal Pain Patients with Different Hopes (Treatment Goals) for Ongoing Chiropractic Care.不同希望(治疗目标)的慢性脊柱疼痛患者接受持续脊骨神经治疗的流行率和特征。
J Altern Complement Med. 2019 Oct;25(10):1015-1025. doi: 10.1089/acm.2019.0247. Epub 2019 Aug 27.
8
Researching the Appropriateness of Care in the Complementary and Integrative Health Professions Part 3: Designing Instruments With Patient Input.补充与整合健康职业中医疗适宜性的研究 第3部分:在患者参与下设计工具
J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2019 Jun;42(5):307-318. doi: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2019.02.006. Epub 2019 Jun 27.
9
Researching the Appropriateness of Care in the Complementary and Integrative Health Professions Part 4: Putting Practice Back Into Evidence-based Practice by Recruiting Clinics and Patients.补充与整合健康职业中医疗适宜性的研究 第4部分:通过招募诊所和患者将实践回归循证实践
J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2019 Jun;42(5):319-326. doi: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2019.02.007. Epub 2019 Jun 18.
10
Are Nonpharmacologic Interventions for Chronic Low Back Pain More Cost Effective Than Usual Care? Proof of Concept Results From a Markov Model.非药物干预慢性下背痛是否比常规治疗更具成本效益?来自马尔可夫模型的概念验证结果。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2019 Oct 15;44(20):1456-1464. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000003097.

本文引用的文献

1
Characteristics of Chiropractic Patients Being Treated for Chronic Low Back and Neck Pain.接受慢性腰颈疼痛治疗的整脊疗法患者的特征。
J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2018 Jul-Aug;41(6):445-455. doi: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2018.02.001. Epub 2018 Aug 16.
2
Manipulation and mobilization for treating chronic low back pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis.手法治疗和关节松动术治疗慢性下腰痛:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Spine J. 2018 May;18(5):866-879. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2018.01.013. Epub 2018 Jan 31.
3
SEaRCH™ expert panel process: streamlining the link between evidence and practice.SEaRCH™专家小组流程:简化证据与实践之间的联系。
BMC Res Notes. 2016 Jan 7;9:16. doi: 10.1186/s13104-015-1802-8.
4
Eliminating waste in US health care.消除美国医疗保健中的浪费。
JAMA. 2012 Apr 11;307(14):1513-6. doi: 10.1001/jama.2012.362. Epub 2012 Mar 14.
5
Evidence based complementary and alternative medicine: promises and problems.循证补充与替代医学:前景与问题
Forsch Komplementmed. 2007 Apr;14(2):102-8. doi: 10.1159/000101054. Epub 2007 Apr 23.
6
The appropriateness method.适当性方法。
Med Decis Making. 2004 Mar-Apr;24(2):228-31. doi: 10.1177/0272989X04264212.
7
The evidence for evidence-based medicine.循证医学的证据
Complement Ther Med. 2000 Jun;8(2):123-6. doi: 10.1054/ctim.2000.0370.
8
A method for the detailed assessment of the appropriateness of medical technologies.一种用于详细评估医疗技术适宜性的方法。
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 1986;2(1):53-63. doi: 10.1017/s0266462300002774.
9
Consensus conferences in different countries. Aims and perspectives.不同国家的共识会议。目标与观点。
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 1988;4(2):305-8. doi: 10.1017/s0266462300004104.
10
Are therapeutic decisions supported by evidence from health care research?医疗决策是否有医疗保健研究证据的支持?
Arch Intern Med. 1998;158(15):1665-8. doi: 10.1001/archinte.158.15.1665.

补充与整合健康职业中医疗适宜性的研究:第一部分。

Researching the Appropriateness of Care in the Complementary and Integrative Health Professions: Part I.

作者信息

Coulter Ian D, Herman Patricia M, Ryan Gery W, Hays Ronald D, Hilton Lara G, Whitley Margaret D

机构信息

RAND Corporation, University of California Los Angeles, Southern California Health Sciences, Santa Monica, California.

RAND Corporation, University of California Los Angeles, Southern California Health Sciences, Santa Monica, California.

出版信息

J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2018 Nov-Dec;41(9):800-806. doi: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2018.11.002. Epub 2019 Feb 10.

DOI:10.1016/j.jmpt.2018.11.002
PMID:30745006
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6420353/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this article is to report on the Center of Excellence for Research on Complementary and Alternative Medicine at RAND Corporation. The overall project examined the appropriateness of chiropractic spinal manipulation and mobilization for chronic low back pain and chronic cervical pain using the RAND and University of California Los Angeles Appropriateness Method, including patient preferences and costs, to acknowledge the importance of patient-centered care in clinical decision-making.

METHODS

This article is a narrative summary of the overall project and its inter-related components (ie, 4 Research Project Grants and 2 centers), including the Data Collection Core, whose activities and learning will be the subject of a following series of methods articles.

RESULTS

The project team faced many challenges in accomplishing data collection goals. The processes we developed to overcome barriers may be of use to other researchers and for practitioners who may want to participate in such studies in complementary and integrative health, which previously was known as complementary and alternative medicine.

CONCLUSION

For this large, complex, successful project, we gathered online survey data, collected charts, and abstracted chart data from thousands of chiropractic patients. The present article delineates the challenges and lessons that were learned during this project so that others may gain from the authors' experience. This information may be of use to future research that collects data from independent practitioners and their patients because it provides what is needed to be successful in such studies and may encourage participation.

摘要

目的

本文旨在报道兰德公司补充与替代医学卓越研究中心。整个项目采用兰德公司与加利福尼亚大学洛杉矶分校适宜性方法,研究脊椎按摩疗法对慢性下背痛和慢性颈痛的适宜性,包括患者偏好和成本,以认识到以患者为中心的护理在临床决策中的重要性。

方法

本文是对整个项目及其相互关联的组成部分(即4项研究项目资助和2个中心)的叙述性总结,包括数据收集核心,其活动和经验教训将是后续一系列方法文章的主题。

结果

项目团队在实现数据收集目标方面面临诸多挑战。我们为克服障碍而制定的流程可能对其他研究人员以及可能希望参与补充与综合健康领域此类研究(以前称为补充与替代医学)的从业者有用。

结论

对于这个大型、复杂且成功的项目,我们收集了在线调查数据、病历,并从数千名脊椎按摩患者中提取了病历数据。本文阐述了该项目期间所面临的挑战和汲取的经验教训,以便其他人能够从作者的经验中受益。这些信息可能对未来从独立从业者及其患者收集数据的研究有用,因为它提供了此类研究取得成功所需的条件,并可能鼓励参与。