• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

蛋鸡业中马立克氏病的防治。

Managing Marek's disease in the egg industry.

机构信息

Department of Integrative Biology, University of California, Berkeley, Valley Life Sciences Building, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA; Department of Mathematics and Statistics, Queen's University, Jeffery Hall, Kingston, ON, K7L 3N6, Canada.

Department of Mathematics and Statistics, Queen's University, Jeffery Hall, Kingston, ON, K7L 3N6, Canada.

出版信息

Epidemics. 2019 Jun;27:52-58. doi: 10.1016/j.epidem.2019.01.004. Epub 2019 Feb 2.

DOI:10.1016/j.epidem.2019.01.004
PMID:30745241
Abstract

The industrialization of farming has had an enormous impact. To most, this impact is viewed solely in the context of productivity, but the denser living conditions and shorter rearing periods of industrial livestock farms provide pathogens with an ideal opportunity to spread and evolve. For example, the industrialization of poultry farms drove the Marek's disease virus (MDV) to evolve from a mild paralytic syndrome to a highly contagious, globally prevalent, deadly disease. Fortunately, the economic catastrophe that would occur from MDV evolution is prevented through the widespread use of live imperfect vaccines that limit disease symptoms, but fail to prevent transmission. Unfortunately, the continued rollout of such imperfect vaccines is steering MDV evolution towards even greater virulence, and the ability to evade vaccine protection. Thus, there is a need to investigate alternative economically viable control measures for their ability to inhibit MDV spread and evolution. In what follows we examine the economic viability of standard husbandry practices for their ability to inhibit the spread of both virulent MDV and very virulent MDV throughout an industrialized egg farm. To do this, we parameterize a MDV transmission model and calculate the loss in egg production due to MDV. We find that MDV strain and the cohort duration have the greatest influence on both disease burden and egg production. Additionally, our findings show that for long cohort durations, conventional cages result in the least per capita loss in egg production due to MDV infection, while Aviary systems perform best over shorter cohort durations. Finally, we find that the least per capita loss in egg production for flocks infected with the more virulent MDV strains occurs when cohort durations are sufficiently short. These results highlight the important decisions that managers will face when implementing new hen husbandry practices.

摘要

农业工业化产生了巨大的影响。在大多数情况下,这种影响仅从生产力的角度来看待,但工业化养殖场中密集的生活条件和更短的饲养周期为病原体的传播和进化提供了理想的机会。例如,家禽养殖场的工业化使马立克氏病病毒(MDV)从轻度瘫痪综合征演变为高度传染性、普遍存在且致命的疾病。幸运的是,通过广泛使用限制疾病症状但无法阻止传播的活不完美疫苗,防止了 MDV 进化带来的经济灾难。不幸的是,这些不完美疫苗的持续推广正在促使 MDV 朝着更高的毒力和逃避疫苗保护的方向进化。因此,需要研究替代的经济可行的控制措施,以评估它们抑制 MDV 传播和进化的能力。在接下来的内容中,我们研究了标准饲养实践在抑制致命 MDV 和非常致命 MDV 在整个工业化蛋鸡场传播和进化方面的经济可行性。为此,我们对 MDV 传播模型进行了参数化,并计算了 MDV 导致的鸡蛋产量损失。我们发现,MDV 株系和群体持续时间对疾病负担和鸡蛋产量都有最大的影响。此外,我们的研究结果表明,对于较长的群体持续时间,由于 MDV 感染,传统鸡笼导致的人均鸡蛋产量损失最小,而禽类系统在较短的群体持续时间内表现最佳。最后,我们发现,当群体持续时间足够短时,感染更致命 MDV 株系的鸡群的人均鸡蛋产量损失最小。这些结果突出了管理者在实施新的母鸡饲养实践时将面临的重要决策。

相似文献

1
Managing Marek's disease in the egg industry.蛋鸡业中马立克氏病的防治。
Epidemics. 2019 Jun;27:52-58. doi: 10.1016/j.epidem.2019.01.004. Epub 2019 Feb 2.
2
The effectiveness of mass vaccination on Marek's disease virus (MDV) outbreaks and detection within a broiler barn: a modeling study.大规模疫苗接种对马立克氏病病毒(MDV)爆发和肉鸡舍内检测的效果:一项建模研究。
Epidemics. 2013 Dec;5(4):208-17. doi: 10.1016/j.epidem.2013.10.001. Epub 2013 Oct 21.
3
Marek's disease vaccines: a solution for today but a worry for tomorrow?马立克氏病疫苗:解决当下问题的方案,却也是未来的担忧?
Vaccine. 2008 Jul 18;26 Suppl 3:C31-41. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2008.04.009.
4
Recombinant Marek's disease virus type 1 provides full protection against very virulent Marek's and infectious bursal disease viruses in chickens.重组马立克氏病病毒 1 型可对鸡的超强毒马立克氏病病毒和传染性法氏囊病病毒提供完全保护。
Sci Rep. 2016 Dec 16;6:39263. doi: 10.1038/srep39263.
5
Identification of Marek's disease virus genes associated with virulence of US strains.鉴定与美国株毒力相关的马立克氏病病毒基因。
J Gen Virol. 2019 Jul;100(7):1132-1139. doi: 10.1099/jgv.0.001288. Epub 2019 Jun 11.
6
Comparative analysis of Marek's disease virus (MDV) glycoprotein-, lytic antigen pp38- and transformation antigen Meq-encoding genes: association of meq mutations with MDVs of high virulence.马立克氏病病毒(MDV)糖蛋白、裂解抗原pp38和转化抗原Meq编码基因的比较分析:Meq突变与高毒力MDV的关联
Vet Microbiol. 2004 Sep 8;102(3-4):147-67. doi: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2004.06.007.
7
Evaluation of the Protection Efficacy of a Serotype 1 Marek's Disease Virus-Vectored Bivalent Vaccine Against Infectious Laryngotracheitis and Marek's Disease.1型马立克氏病病毒载体二价疫苗对传染性喉气管炎和马立克氏病的免疫保护效果评估
Avian Dis. 2015 Jun;59(2):255-62. doi: 10.1637/10966-103014-Reg.
8
Host genetic resistance to Marek's disease sustains protective efficacy of herpesvirus of turkey in both experimental and commercial lines of chickens.宿主对马立克氏病的遗传抗性维持了火鸡疱疹病毒在实验和商业鸡群中的保护效力。
Vaccine. 2014 Apr 1;32(16):1820-7. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2014.01.092. Epub 2014 Feb 13.
9
Characterization of four very virulent Argentinian strains of Marek's disease virus and the influence of one of those isolates on synergism between Marek's disease vaccine viruses.四株阿根廷超强毒马立克氏病病毒的特性以及其中一株分离株对马立克氏病疫苗病毒间协同作用的影响
Avian Pathol. 2004 Apr;33(2):190-5. doi: 10.1080/03079450310001652103.
10
Effect of diluting Marek's disease vaccines on the outcomes of Marek's disease virus infection when challenged with highly virulent Marek's disease viruses.用高致病性马立克氏病病毒攻毒时,稀释马立克氏病疫苗对马立克氏病病毒感染结果的影响。
Avian Dis. 2011 Jun;55(2):263-72. doi: 10.1637/9579-101510-Reg.1.

引用本文的文献

1
Molecular discernment and histopathological features of oncogenic Marek's disease virus among different farmed avian species in Egypt.埃及不同养殖禽类物种中致癌性马立克氏病病毒的分子识别与组织病理学特征
Sci Rep. 2025 May 2;15(1):15409. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-98196-5.
2
The First Record of an Aggressive Form of Ocular Tumour Enhanced by Marek's Disease Virus Infection in Layer Flock in Al-Najaf, Iraq.伊拉克纳杰夫蛋鸡群中由马立克氏病病毒感染引发的侵袭性眼肿瘤的首例记录。
Vet Med Int. 2024 Sep 30;2024:1793189. doi: 10.1155/2024/1793189. eCollection 2024.
3
Identification of Disalicyloyl Curcumin as a Potential DNA Polymerase Inhibitor for Marek's Disease Herpesvirus: A Computational Study Using Virtual Screening and Molecular Dynamics Simulations.
双水杨酰姜黄素作为马立克氏病疱疹病毒潜在DNA聚合酶抑制剂的鉴定:一项使用虚拟筛选和分子动力学模拟的计算研究
Molecules. 2023 Sep 12;28(18):6576. doi: 10.3390/molecules28186576.
4
Economic and value chain analysis to support an investigation and risk mitigation efforts on Marek's disease in layers in the southern part of Thailand.经济与价值链分析,以支持对泰国南部蛋鸡马立克氏病的调查及风险缓解工作。
Vet World. 2023 Jan;16(1):35-45. doi: 10.14202/vetworld.2023.35-45. Epub 2023 Jan 9.
5
Development of a one-run real-time PCR detection system for pathogens associated with poultry infectious diseases.开发一种用于检测禽类传染病相关病原体的单管实时 PCR 检测系统。
J Vet Med Sci. 2023 Mar 30;85(4):407-411. doi: 10.1292/jvms.22-0482. Epub 2023 Mar 16.
6
Which 'imperfect vaccines' encourage the evolution of higher virulence?哪些“不完善的疫苗”会促使更高毒力的毒株进化?
Evol Med Public Health. 2022 Apr 26;10(1):202-213. doi: 10.1093/emph/eoac015. eCollection 2022.
7
Characterization of a Novel Viral Interleukin 8 (vIL-8) Splice Variant Encoded by Marek's Disease Virus.马立克氏病病毒编码的新型病毒白细胞介素8(vIL-8)剪接变体的特性分析
Microorganisms. 2021 Jul 9;9(7):1475. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms9071475.
8
Genetic evolution of Marek's disease virus in vaccinated poultry farms.接种疫苗的家禽养殖场中马立克氏病病毒的基因进化
Vet World. 2021 May;14(5):1342-1353. doi: 10.14202/vetworld.2021.1342-1353. Epub 2021 May 28.
9
Avian Viruses that Impact Table Egg Production.影响蛋鸡产蛋的禽病毒。
Animals (Basel). 2020 Sep 25;10(10):1747. doi: 10.3390/ani10101747.
10
Latest Insights into Marek's Disease Virus Pathogenesis and Tumorigenesis.马立克氏病病毒发病机制与肿瘤发生的最新见解
Cancers (Basel). 2020 Mar 10;12(3):647. doi: 10.3390/cancers12030647.