Suppr超能文献

用于强迫症的毁损性神经外科手术和深部脑刺激

Ablative neurosurgery and deep brain stimulation for obsessive-compulsive disorder.

作者信息

Balachander Srinivas, Arumugham Shyam Sundar, Srinivas Dwarakanath

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry, OCD Clinic, National Institute of Mental Health and Neurosciences, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.

Department of Neurosurgery, National Institute of Mental Health and Neurosciences, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.

出版信息

Indian J Psychiatry. 2019 Jan;61(Suppl 1):S77-S84. doi: 10.4103/psychiatry.IndianJPsychiatry_523_18.

Abstract

Despite advancements in pharmacotherapeutic and behavioral interventions, a substantial proportion of patients with obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) continue to have disabling and treatment-refractory illness. Neurosurgical interventions, including ablative procedures and deep brain stimulation (DBS), have emerged as potential treatment options in this population. We review the recent literature on contemporary surgical options for OCD, focusing on clinical aspects such as patient selection, presurgical assessment, and safety and effectiveness of these procedures. Given the invasiveness and limited evidence, these procedures have been performed in carefully selected patients with severe, chronic, and treatment-refractory illness. Along with informed consent, an independent review by a multidisciplinary team is mandated in many centers. Both ablative procedures and DBS have been found to be helpful in around half the patients, with improvement observed months after the procedure. Various targets have been proposed for either procedure, based on the dominant corticostriatal model of OCD. There is no strong evidence to recommend one procedure over the other. Hence, the choice of procedure is often based on the factors such as affordability, expertise, and reversibility of adverse effects. Surgery is not recommended as a standalone treatment but should be provided as part of a comprehensive package including medications and psychotherapeutic interventions. Available evidence suggest that the benefits of the procedure outweigh the risks in a treatment-refractory population. Advances in neurosurgical techniques and increasing knowledge of neurobiology are likely to bring about further progress in the efficacy, safety, and acceptability of the procedures.

摘要

尽管在药物治疗和行为干预方面取得了进展,但相当一部分强迫症(OCD)患者仍患有致残性且难治的疾病。神经外科干预措施,包括毁损性手术和深部脑刺激(DBS),已成为这一人群潜在的治疗选择。我们回顾了近期关于OCD当代手术选择的文献,重点关注患者选择、术前评估以及这些手术的安全性和有效性等临床方面。鉴于其侵入性和证据有限,这些手术仅在经过精心挑选的患有严重、慢性且难治性疾病的患者中进行。在许多中心,除了知情同意外,还要求由多学科团队进行独立评估。毁损性手术和DBS在大约一半的患者中都被发现有帮助,术后数月可见病情改善。基于OCD的主要皮质纹状体模型,两种手术都提出了不同的靶点。没有有力证据表明一种手术优于另一种。因此,手术方式的选择通常基于可承受性、专业知识以及不良反应的可逆性等因素。不建议将手术作为单一治疗方法,而应作为包括药物治疗和心理治疗干预在内的综合治疗方案的一部分。现有证据表明,在难治性人群中,手术的益处大于风险。神经外科技术的进步以及对神经生物学认识的不断提高,可能会在手术的疗效、安全性和可接受性方面带来进一步进展。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e21f/6343416/27f08547dfd5/IJPsy-61-77-g002.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验