[Comparison of high and low osmolar roentgen contrast media in quantitative coronary angiography].

In 48 patients undergoing diagnostic coronary angiography changes of mean diameters of angiographically "normal" coronary segments after intracoronary injections of diatrizoate 76% or iopromide 370 performed in different intervals, were analyzed with a computer-assisted contour detection system (CAAS). Four study protocols were applied, differing in respect to the type of contrast medium administered and/or to the timing of the reference- and control-angiograms in the course of diagnostic coronary angiography. Coronary angiograms in identical projections were performed before (= reference) and directly after (1. control = C1) diagnostic angiography of the left coronary artery by injection of either diatrizoate 76% (group 1, 10 patients) or iopromide 370 (group II, 11 patients). Additional coronary angiograms were performed 1, 3, 6, and 10 min after C1. During diagnostic angiography in either group about eight dye injections were performed in about seven min. With diatrizoate 76% a significant coronary dilation averaging 18.9 +/- 6.7% (p less than 0.001) was observed at C1, depending on the number of diagnostic dye injections performed per min (mean 1.2 +/- 0.3) and on the interval between the last diagnostic injection and C1 (mean 73 +/- 35 s). Coronary dilation persisted up to the sixth minute (6.2 +/- 4.6%, p less than 0.01). With iopromide 370 a small but significant coronary dilation was observed merely at C1 (5.8 +/- 4.3%, p less than 0.05). In two other studies coronary angiograms were performed in identical projections immediately following complete diagnostic coronary angiography (reference) and in addition after 3, 4, 5, 6, 10, and 20 min (group III, 18 patients) and after 10, 20, and 30 min, respectively (group IV, 9 patients) by administration of diatrizoate 76% as the only contrast medium. Short injection intervals (1 min) resulted in a mild coronary dilation (mean up to 2.4 +/- 4.1% compared to reference; p less than 0.05), longer intervals (3-10 min) resulted in a marked diameter reduction (averaging up to -9.7 +/- 9%; p less than 0.05), probably a consequence of the return of coronary vasomotor tone to baseline levels. These results suggest that in quantitative coronary angiographic studies (e.g., testing coronary vasomotility) non-ionic contrast media should preferably be applied, and adequate injection intervals (greater than 2 min) are mandatory. In intervention- and follow-up studies based on repeated coronary angiograms dye-induced changes of coronary vasomotor tone can be avoided by premedication with vasodilating drugs, e.g. nitrates, and/or calcium antagonists.