Suppr超能文献

脂质体布比卡因与标准布比卡因肋间神经阻滞对微创胸外科手术患者住院时间的影响。

Impact of intercostal nerve blocks using liposomal versus standard bupivacaine on length of stay in minimally invasive thoracic surgery patients.

作者信息

Dominguez Dana A, Ely Sora, Bach Cynthia, Lee Tina, Velotta Jeffrey B

机构信息

Department of Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA.

Kaiser Permanente Medical Center, Oakland, CA, USA.

出版信息

J Thorac Dis. 2018 Dec;10(12):6873-6879. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2018.10.124.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Postsurgical pain control can have a significant impact on patient outcomes and hospital-associated costs. We sought to evaluate the effect of intercostal nerve blocks using liposomal bupivacaine on length of stay (LOS) in patients undergoing video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS).

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed outcomes in 80 patients undergoing VATS wedge resection, VATS lobectomy, or minimally-invasive esophagectomy (MIE). Patients received either liposomal bupivacaine (n=40) or standard-release bupivacaine with epinephrine (n=40) via intercostal nerve block. The LOS, 24-hour postoperative pain scores, overall opioid usage, and patient ambulation rates at 24 hours were compared for the two groups.

RESULTS

The median LOS was significantly shorter in patients receiving liposomal bupivacaine, at 1.35 days (IQR, 1.28 to 1.53 days) compared to 2.45 days (IQR, 2.08 to 3.51 days) in patients receiving standard-release bupivacaine (P<0.0001). Average post-operative pain score during the first 24 hours was 3.4±1.8 for the liposomal bupivacaine group and 2.3±1.2 for the control group (P=0.002). This difference, though statistically significant, is likely not clinically significant, as there was no difference in 24-hour postoperative intravenous morphine equivalent usage between the liposomal bupivacaine and control groups (29.8±21.0 31.9±20.9 mg, respectively, P=0.664). Interestingly, however, 93% (37/40) of patients receiving liposomal bupivacaine were able to ambulate within 24-hours after surgery, compared to 65% (26/40) of patients in the control group (P=0.003).

CONCLUSIONS

The use of liposomal bupivacaine is associated with decreased LOS in postoperative thoracic surgery patients and earlier return to ambulation. It does not, however, decrease 24-hour postoperative pain scores or opioid usage.

摘要

背景

术后疼痛控制对患者预后和医院相关成本有重大影响。我们旨在评估使用脂质体布比卡因进行肋间神经阻滞对接受电视辅助胸腔镜手术(VATS)患者住院时间(LOS)的影响。

方法

我们回顾性分析了80例接受VATS楔形切除术、VATS肺叶切除术或微创食管切除术(MIE)患者的预后情况。患者通过肋间神经阻滞分别接受脂质体布比卡因(n = 40)或含肾上腺素的标准释放布比卡因(n = 40)。比较两组患者的住院时间、术后24小时疼痛评分、总体阿片类药物使用量以及术后24小时患者的活动率。

结果

接受脂质体布比卡因的患者中位住院时间显著缩短,为1.35天(四分位间距,1.28至1.53天),而接受标准释放布比卡因的患者为2.45天(四分位间距,2.08至3.51天)(P < 0.0001)。脂质体布比卡因组术后前24小时的平均疼痛评分为3.4±1.8,对照组为2.3±1.2(P = 0.002)。尽管这一差异具有统计学意义,但可能无临床意义,因为脂质体布比卡因组和对照组术后24小时静脉注射吗啡等效剂量的使用量无差异(分别为29.8±21.0和31.9±20.9 mg,P = 0.664)。然而,有趣的是,接受脂质体布比卡因的患者中有93%(37/40)在术后24小时内能够活动,而对照组患者为65%(26/40)(P = 0.003)。

结论

使用脂质体布比卡因可使胸外科术后患者的住院时间缩短,并能更早恢复活动。然而,它并未降低术后24小时疼痛评分或阿片类药物使用量。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

7
Outcomes of inpatient mobilization: a literature review.住院患者活动的结果:一项文献综述。
J Clin Nurs. 2014 Jun;23(11-12):1486-501. doi: 10.1111/jocn.12315. Epub 2013 Sep 13.
8
Fast-track rehabilitation for lung cancer lobectomy: a five-year experience.肺癌肺叶切除的快速康复:五年经验
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2009 Aug;36(2):383-91; discussion 391-2. doi: 10.1016/j.ejcts.2009.02.020. Epub 2009 Mar 26.
9
Preventing and treating pain after thoracic surgery.预防和治疗胸外科手术后的疼痛。
Anesthesiology. 2006 Mar;104(3):594-600. doi: 10.1097/00000542-200603000-00027.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验