Suppr超能文献

脂质体布比卡因在胸外科手术中的疗效:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。

The Efficacy of Liposomal Bupivacaine in Thoracic Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

作者信息

Gong Ruisong, Tan Gang, Huang Yuguang

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Beijing, 100730, People's Republic of China.

出版信息

J Pain Res. 2024 Nov 28;17:4039-4051. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S492117. eCollection 2024.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Patients undergoing thoracic surgery suffer from severe postoperative pain, and a series of complications will occur if there is no effective analgesic treatment. Liposomal bupivacaine (LB) is a novel multivesicular formulation with up to 72 hours of analgesia, which can be used in thoracic surgery. This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the efficacy of LB in improving recovery in patients undergoing thoracic surgery compared with non-liposomal local anesthetics.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A literature search was conducted using PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, and Web of science, and to identify all observational or retrospective studies and randomized controlled trials (RCTs) from inception to December 2023. The primary outcome was the in-hospital postsurgical opioid consumption in morphine milligram equivalents (MMEs). Secondary outcomes included 24-hour postoperative MMEs, postoperative pain score in the first 24 and 48 hours, hospital length of stay (LOS), time to first ambulation, readmission, and perioperative complications. RevMan 5.3 was used for the data analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 10 studies were included in the analysis, of which eight were observational or retrospective analyses and two were RCTs. There were no significant differences in the postoperative MMEs, pain score, LOS, time to first ambulation, readmission, and perioperative complications.

CONCLUSION

According to this meta-analysis, LB was found to be not superior to non-liposomal local anesthetics for analgesic and functional outcomes in thoracic surgery.

摘要

目的

接受胸外科手术的患者术后会遭受严重疼痛,若没有有效的镇痛治疗,将会发生一系列并发症。脂质体布比卡因(LB)是一种新型多泡制剂,具有长达72小时的镇痛作用,可用于胸外科手术。本荟萃分析旨在评估与非脂质体局部麻醉剂相比,LB在改善胸外科手术患者恢复情况方面的疗效。

患者与方法

使用PubMed、Cochrane图书馆、Embase和科学网进行文献检索,以识别从开始到2023年12月的所有观察性或回顾性研究以及随机对照试验(RCT)。主要结局是以吗啡毫克当量(MME)表示的术后住院期间阿片类药物消耗量。次要结局包括术后24小时MME、术后第1个24小时和48小时的疼痛评分、住院时间(LOS)、首次下床活动时间、再入院情况以及围手术期并发症。使用RevMan 5.3进行数据分析。

结果

共有10项研究纳入分析,其中8项为观察性或回顾性分析,2项为RCT。术后MME、疼痛评分、LOS、首次下床活动时间、再入院情况和围手术期并发症方面无显著差异。

结论

根据本荟萃分析,发现LB在胸外科手术的镇痛和功能结局方面并不优于非脂质体局部麻醉剂。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d59a/11611704/ccb4401efb06/JPR-17-4039-g0001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验