Báez-Ferrer Néstor, Izquierdo-Gómez María Manuela, Marí-López Belén, Montoto-López Javier, Duque-Gómez Amelia, García-Niebla Javier, Miranda-Bacallado Julio, de la Rosa Hernández Alejandro, Laynez-Cerdeña Ignacio, Lacalzada-Almeida Juan
Department of Cardiology, Hospital Universitario de Canarias, Tenerife, Spain.
Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Hospital Universitario de Canarias, Tenerife, Spain.
J Thorac Dis. 2018 Dec;10(12):6969-6986. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2018.10.64.
Ischemic mitral regurgitation (IMR) is a frequent complication after acute myocardial infarction (AMI) associated with a worse prognosis. The pathophysiological mechanisms of IMR are not fully understood, but it is known to be a complex process in which ventricular remodelling is the main causal factor. The various imaging techniques in cardiology and echocardiography fundamentally have contributed significantly to clarify the mechanisms that cause and progressively aggravate IMR. At present, different therapeutic options, the most important of which are cardio-surgical, address this problem. Nowadays the improvement in cardiac surgery and transcatheter therapies, have shown a therapeutic advance in IMR management. IMR is a predictor of poor prognosis in patients with heart failure and depressed left ventricular (LV) systolic function. However, it remains controversial whether mitral regurgitation (MR) in these patients is a consequence of dilation and dysfunction of the LV, or whether it contributes to worsening the prognosis of the ventricular dysfunction. Given that echocardiography has a fundamental reference role in the identification, graduation of severity and evaluation of the therapeutics used in the treatment of MR, we are going to focus on it over the rest of the imaging techniques. In contrast to primary MR the benefits of mitral surgery in patients with secondary MR are uncertain. Therefore, we will comment fundamentally on the role of mitral surgery in patients with IMR, with an update of the different surgical interventions available, without forgetting to mention the other therapeutic options currently available.
缺血性二尖瓣反流(IMR)是急性心肌梗死(AMI)后常见的并发症,与较差的预后相关。IMR的病理生理机制尚未完全明确,但已知这是一个复杂的过程,其中心室重构是主要的致病因素。心脏病学和超声心动图中的各种成像技术从根本上为阐明导致并逐渐加重IMR的机制做出了重大贡献。目前,针对这一问题有不同的治疗选择,其中最重要的是心脏外科手术。如今,心脏手术和经导管治疗的进步已在IMR的管理方面显示出治疗进展。IMR是心力衰竭和左心室(LV)收缩功能减退患者预后不良的预测指标。然而,这些患者的二尖瓣反流(MR)是LV扩张和功能障碍的结果,还是其导致心室功能障碍预后恶化,仍存在争议。鉴于超声心动图在MR治疗中所采用的识别、严重程度分级及治疗评估方面具有重要的参考作用,我们将重点关注它,而不是其他成像技术。与原发性MR不同,二尖瓣手术对继发性MR患者的益处尚不确定。因此,我们将主要阐述二尖瓣手术在IMR患者中的作用,并更新现有的不同手术干预方法,同时也不会忘记提及目前可用的其他治疗选择。