• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

牙源性角化囊肿的扩散加权磁共振成像:表观扩散系数图在正常结构和病变特征表征中的应用初步研究

Diffusion-weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Odontogenic Keratocysts: Preliminary Study on Usefulness of Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Maps for Characterization of Normal Structures and Lesions.

作者信息

Ogura Ichiro, Nakahara Ken, Sasaki Yoshihiko, Sue Mikiko, Oda Takaaki

出版信息

Chin J Dent Res. 2019;22(1):51-56. doi: 10.3290/j.cjdr.a41775.

DOI:10.3290/j.cjdr.a41775
PMID:30746533
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the usefulness of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DWI) in odontogenic keratocysts, especially apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) maps for the characterisation of normal structures and cystic lesions in the jaw.

METHODS

Sixteen patients who underwent magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for the diagnosis of a cystic lesion in the jaw were included in this prospective study. DWI was performed on a 1.5 T unit with b factor of 0 and 800 s/mm2, and ADC maps were generated. ADC values were measured for the normal structures in the upper neck area and for the cystic lesion in the jaw.

RESULTS

The mean ADC value of the cerebrospinal fluid (3.66 ± 0.47 × 10-3 mm2/s) in the upper neck area was higher than that of the nasal mucosa (1.80 ± 0.19 × 10-3 mm2/s), Waldeyer's ring (0.75 ± 0.11 × 10-3 mm2/s) and the spinal cord (0.71 ± 0.20 × 10-3 mm2/s). The mean ADC value of the five odontogenic keratocysts (1.03 ± 0.31 × 10-3 mm2/s) was lower than that of the one simple bone cyst (2.79 × 10-3 mm2/s), three nasopalatine duct cysts (2.28 ± 0.12 × 10-3 mm2/s), three radicular cysts (1.82 ± 0.71 × 10-3 mm2/s) and four dentigerous cysts (1.67 ± 1.06 × 10-3 mm2/s).

CONCLUSION

This study suggested the usefulness of DWI in odontogenic keratocysts, especially ADC maps for the characterization of normal structures and cystic lesions in the jaw.

摘要

目的

探讨磁共振扩散加权成像(DWI)在牙源性角化囊肿中的应用价值,尤其是表观扩散系数(ADC)图在颌骨正常结构及囊性病变特征描述方面的作用。

方法

本前瞻性研究纳入了16例因颌骨囊性病变接受磁共振成像(MRI)检查的患者。在1.5T设备上进行DWI检查,b值分别为0和800s/mm²,并生成ADC图。测量上颈部区域正常结构及颌骨囊性病变的ADC值。

结果

上颈部区域脑脊液的平均ADC值(3.66±0.47×10⁻³mm²/s)高于鼻黏膜(1.80±0.19×10⁻³mm²/s)、咽淋巴环(0.75±0.11×10⁻³mm²/s)和脊髓(0.71±0.20×10⁻³mm²/s)。5个牙源性角化囊肿的平均ADC值(1.03±0.31×10⁻³mm²/s)低于1个单纯性骨囊肿(2.79×10⁻³mm²/s)、3个鼻腭管囊肿(2.28±0.12×10⁻³mm²/s)、3个根尖囊肿(1.82±0.71×10⁻³mm²/s)和4个含牙囊肿(1.67±1.06×10⁻³mm²/s)。

结论

本研究表明DWI在牙源性角化囊肿中具有应用价值,尤其是ADC图在颌骨正常结构及囊性病变特征描述方面。

相似文献

1
Diffusion-weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Odontogenic Keratocysts: Preliminary Study on Usefulness of Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Maps for Characterization of Normal Structures and Lesions.牙源性角化囊肿的扩散加权磁共振成像:表观扩散系数图在正常结构和病变特征表征中的应用初步研究
Chin J Dent Res. 2019;22(1):51-56. doi: 10.3290/j.cjdr.a41775.
2
Diffusion-Weighted Imaging in the Oral and Maxillofacial Region: Usefulness of Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Maps and Maximum Intensity Projection for Characterization of Normal Structures and Lesions.口腔颌面区域的扩散加权成像:表观扩散系数图和最大强度投影在正常结构及病变特征描述中的应用价值
Pol J Radiol. 2017 Oct 20;82:571-577. doi: 10.12659/PJR.902524. eCollection 2017.
3
Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging in oral and maxillofacial lesions: preliminary study on diagnostic ability of apparent diffusion coefficient maps.口腔颌面部病变的磁共振扩散加权成像:表观扩散系数图诊断能力的初步研究
Oral Radiol. 2018 Sep;34(3):224-228. doi: 10.1007/s11282-017-0303-y. Epub 2017 Sep 4.
4
Diffusion-weighted imaging in the head and neck region: usefulness of apparent diffusion coefficient values for characterization of lesions.头颈部区域的扩散加权成像:表观扩散系数值在病变特征描述中的应用价值
Diagn Interv Radiol. 2015 May-Jun;21(3):208-14. doi: 10.5152/dir.2014.14279.
5
Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging in the characterization of odontogenic cysts and tumors.磁共振弥散加权成像在牙源性囊肿和肿瘤中的特征表现。
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2020 Oct;130(4):447-454. doi: 10.1016/j.oooo.2020.04.010. Epub 2020 May 19.
6
Diffusion-Weighted MR Imaging of Unicystic Odontogenic Tumors for Differentiation of Unicystic Ameloblastomas from Keratocystic Odontogenic Tumors.弥散加权磁共振成像在单囊型牙源性肿瘤鉴别诊断中的应用:单囊型成釉细胞瘤与角化囊性瘤。
Korean J Radiol. 2018 Jan-Feb;19(1):79-84. doi: 10.3348/kjr.2018.19.1.79. Epub 2018 Jan 2.
7
Differentiation of cystic lesions in the jaw by conventional magnetic resonance imaging and diffusion-weighted imaging.常规磁共振成像和弥散加权成像鉴别颌骨囊性病变。
Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2022 Jan 1;51(1):20210212. doi: 10.1259/dmfr.20210212. Epub 2021 Jun 16.
8
Diffusion-weighted imaging in the evaluation of odontogenic cysts and tumours.弥散加权成像在牙源性囊肿和肿瘤评估中的应用。
Br J Radiol. 2012 Oct;85(1018):e864-70. doi: 10.1259/bjr/54433314. Epub 2012 May 2.
9
Cystic lesions of the maxillomandibular region: MR imaging distinction of odontogenic keratocysts and ameloblastomas from other cysts.上颌下颌区域的囊性病变:牙源性角化囊肿和成釉细胞瘤与其他囊肿的磁共振成像鉴别
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1996 Apr;166(4):943-9. doi: 10.2214/ajr.166.4.8610578.
10
Application of diffusion kurtosis imaging to odontogenic lesions: Analysis of the cystic component.扩散峰度成像在牙源性病变中的应用:囊性成分分析
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2016 Dec;44(6):1565-1571. doi: 10.1002/jmri.25307. Epub 2016 May 17.

引用本文的文献

1
Apparent diffusion coefficient for distinguishing between benign and malignant lesions in submandibular and sublingual spaces.表观扩散系数用于鉴别颌下间隙和舌下间隙的良恶性病变
Oral Radiol. 2025 Sep 3. doi: 10.1007/s11282-025-00857-8.
2
Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging for differentiation of unicystic ameloblastoma, odontogenic keratocyst, and dentigerous cyst: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.用于鉴别单囊性成釉细胞瘤、牙源性角化囊肿和含牙囊肿的磁共振扩散加权成像:一项系统评价和网状Meta分析
Imaging Sci Dent. 2025 Jun;55(2):105-113. doi: 10.5624/isd.20240227. Epub 2025 Apr 28.
3
Characteristic Mean Kurtosis Values in Simple Diffusion Kurtosis Imaging of Dentigerous Cysts.
含牙囊肿单纯扩散峰度成像中的特征性平均峰度值
Diagnostics (Basel). 2023 Dec 7;13(24):3619. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics13243619.